3981
Comments (210)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
30
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 30 points ago +30 / -0

The two forensic audits were by that pair of "officially certified" companies that the Left and the RINOs wanted. Not a true 3rd party.

There forensic audit is about as needed as used toilet paper.

12
seektruth2021 12 points ago +13 / -1

Yeah, by what I understand from a Q&A with the county Recorder, he basically admitted that these were the only companies licensed(?) to certify this election equipment. I believe he actually said, "certified." That is NOT the same as a forensic audit, which is the impression the BoS has been trying to give. Well, unless you complain about not allowing observers, and then your lawyers argue that no, in fact, this is definitely not an audit.

That is like passing Obamacare by claiming it is not a tax, and then defending it in the supreme court by saying it IS a tax.

4
cryogen 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Licensed" just means approved by the very bodies under suspicion. It's like the Mafia telling you that Uncle Tony's is definitely the only Accounting firm that can look at the Boss's books. Because he's "licensed"!

1
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. Hence the disdain for it.