Yep, I can confirm that. It’s just what materials and what does the senate do with them. Who audits them. When Fann is trying to say ASOG aren’t reputable because we have a political leaning, data and evidence does not have a political ideology. She’s trying to simultaneously look like a hero and do a nothing audit and say, “well, I tried!”
Yep, I already sent her an email along those lines. I heard Lyle Rapacki said they would be choosing an "audit team" on Monday. I thought ASOG already had a deal with AZ Senate?
We had what I believe is called an offer of intention. $10,000 for 8 people, 8-10 hour days, for 10 days. Basically pays for flights, food, and lodging. Now we’re too far right- according to Karen Fann.
Anyway you think you can change her mind? I've emailed her but I'm not sure if we will have enough time to get her to change her mind. Since you seem to communicate with some of the senators anyway you could tell them something like this: Look people will only accept the results of the audit if they trust who does it. Thats the big issue here is Trust. so far the public who is demanding the audit trust ASOG. Code, data, etc has no political leanings. Our results would be honest and would be scrutinized just the same. If you could get the senate to realize that if ppl don't trust the auditors it will only make them angry and more frustrated, maybe they will listen? The people need to trust who is doing the audit! Also, are there any other companies you trust to do the audit? That you guys could recommend so even if she decides not to go with you. We could have chance of getting it done right.
Why not let ASOG and another company, or even two other independent companies audit them? Also, why does Fann care about a right leaning audit team if she's right leaning? The Dems NEVER care about something like that.
I read a post that said the County is ready to comply and will surrender the necessary materials to the State Senate. Can't confirm though
Yep, I can confirm that. It’s just what materials and what does the senate do with them. Who audits them. When Fann is trying to say ASOG aren’t reputable because we have a political leaning, data and evidence does not have a political ideology. She’s trying to simultaneously look like a hero and do a nothing audit and say, “well, I tried!”
Yep, I already sent her an email along those lines. I heard Lyle Rapacki said they would be choosing an "audit team" on Monday. I thought ASOG already had a deal with AZ Senate?
We had what I believe is called an offer of intention. $10,000 for 8 people, 8-10 hour days, for 10 days. Basically pays for flights, food, and lodging. Now we’re too far right- according to Karen Fann.
Anyway you think you can change her mind? I've emailed her but I'm not sure if we will have enough time to get her to change her mind. Since you seem to communicate with some of the senators anyway you could tell them something like this: Look people will only accept the results of the audit if they trust who does it. Thats the big issue here is Trust. so far the public who is demanding the audit trust ASOG. Code, data, etc has no political leanings. Our results would be honest and would be scrutinized just the same. If you could get the senate to realize that if ppl don't trust the auditors it will only make them angry and more frustrated, maybe they will listen? The people need to trust who is doing the audit! Also, are there any other companies you trust to do the audit? That you guys could recommend so even if she decides not to go with you. We could have chance of getting it done right.
Why not let ASOG and another company, or even two other independent companies audit them? Also, why does Fann care about a right leaning audit team if she's right leaning? The Dems NEVER care about something like that.