158 I guess some folks don't get it. Here, let me make it easy for you... (media.patriots.win) posted 48 days ago by Cyberpunkd 48 days ago by Cyberpunkd +159 / -1 15 comments share 15 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (15) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 0 ▼ – Slice 0 points 48 days ago +1 / -1 Reform voting laws? They flagrantly broke voting laws and no one gave a shit, the SCOTUS said F You and F your law and F your Constitution. You know who has standing? Any Democrat who challenges a rigged election. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – BasedTemplar 1 point 48 days ago +1 / -0 Ignore my other suggestions then. Doomers are useless petulant faggots. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – Slice 0 points 47 days ago +1 / -1 Because I'm willing to address the giant elephant in the room, I'm a doomed, useless, petulant faggot? They broke all the laws we already have and you want to make more laws they won't follow? I'm sure that's going to work out well for you. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – BasedTemplar 1 point 47 days ago +1 / -0 You're strawmanning now. Go back and read the original comment, read my follow up, then repent of your faggotry. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Slice 1 point 47 days ago +1 / -0 A strawman is an argument that doesn't refute the point.. The point is you want to change the law.. My point immediately refutes that in that they don't follow the law and SCOTUS isn't going to uphold any law you pass. permalink parent save report block reply
Reform voting laws? They flagrantly broke voting laws and no one gave a shit, the SCOTUS said F You and F your law and F your Constitution.
You know who has standing? Any Democrat who challenges a rigged election.
Ignore my other suggestions then.
Doomers are useless petulant faggots.
Because I'm willing to address the giant elephant in the room, I'm a doomed, useless, petulant faggot?
They broke all the laws we already have and you want to make more laws they won't follow? I'm sure that's going to work out well for you.
You're strawmanning now.
Go back and read the original comment, read my follow up, then repent of your faggotry.
A strawman is an argument that doesn't refute the point.. The point is you want to change the law.. My point immediately refutes that in that they don't follow the law and SCOTUS isn't going to uphold any law you pass.