A strawman is an argument that doesn't refute the point.. The point is you want to change the law.. My point immediately refutes that in that they don't follow the law and SCOTUS isn't going to uphold any law you pass.
What about my other two points? You can't just take my blueprint for a bike, point out one of it's wheels, then lambaste me for planning to get around with nothing but a single tire.
Ignore my other suggestions then.
Doomers are useless petulant faggots.
Because I'm willing to address the giant elephant in the room, I'm a doomed, useless, petulant faggot?
They broke all the laws we already have and you want to make more laws they won't follow? I'm sure that's going to work out well for you.
You're strawmanning now.
Go back and read the original comment, read my follow up, then repent of your faggotry.
A strawman is an argument that doesn't refute the point.. The point is you want to change the law.. My point immediately refutes that in that they don't follow the law and SCOTUS isn't going to uphold any law you pass.
What about my other two points? You can't just take my blueprint for a bike, point out one of it's wheels, then lambaste me for planning to get around with nothing but a single tire.
Address the other two points.