158
Comments (15)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
BasedTemplar 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're strawmanning now.

Go back and read the original comment, read my follow up, then repent of your faggotry.

1
Slice 1 point ago +1 / -0

A strawman is an argument that doesn't refute the point.. The point is you want to change the law.. My point immediately refutes that in that they don't follow the law and SCOTUS isn't going to uphold any law you pass.

2
BasedTemplar 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about my other two points? You can't just take my blueprint for a bike, point out one of it's wheels, then lambaste me for planning to get around with nothing but a single tire.

Address the other two points.

0
Slice 0 points ago +1 / -1

It should be Valid, if the RINOs are not apart of this whole thing. Most people are thinking them cowardly. But I fear they are just part of the Uniparty.

But to address that point, changing things like ID and mail in are supposed to be done by the legislatures. But judges and election officials changed the rules last minute. And no judge is throwing that out. What difference does it make if you ban mail in voting and the election officials can just mail out ballots and no one cares?

That's what happened.. Voting reform only matters if you enforce it and RINOs will never enforce it. Look at AZ and Mericopa giving the finger to the Legislature. They don't care.

We will know more as that situation develops. If it goes no where. We are screwed.