Comments (8)
sorted by:
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +5 / -2

People need to understand that every demographic is allowed to be criticized in public except for one - and that is just the way it is!

1
RememberKosciuszko [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

Nah, I hate all those fuckers alike and I'm willing to criticize them all, Globohomo Schlomos included

But there is this one shill banned 3 or 4 times already and he talks ONLY about MUH JOOS and nothing else, like he fucking missed his antipsychotics dose or something

All the Jews and only Jews all the time

Basically acts like a shill producing spicy screencaps to wank with fellow commies how the right are all nazis

Some of the people on the top that are the problem are Jews, of course

But is it Judaism and Zionism that is the problem or pathological wealth and general sociopathic tendencies of the wealthiest?

3
sun_wolf 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yes I agree that people who only talk about Jewish People are either shills or unhealthily obsessed. It is also a sensitive, delicate subject so it takes a lot of finesse to even mention it in any way without people mentally shutting down. However, I don’t think it’s accurate that Jewish People are allowed to be criticized in any way and for any reason in public. You are able to do it anonymously on the Internet, but to do it in public, that is not permitted. Muslims we can criticize, The Vatican and The Pope we can criticize, gays we can criticize, blacks, whites, Asians, everybody. But nobody dares say even a whisper of criticism of Jewish People in public because that shuts them down completely. They will not be allowed to work, to bank, to be published - it is a total cancellation of the person from society.

2
RememberKosciuszko [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not where I live

Our current gov openly opposes their unreasonable demands. At least opposed in the recent past; not sure how it turned out because it went silent but I think they're standing their ground)

Jews wanted alleged pre-war Jewish properties that didn't have any clear owner in the registers at the time and Treasury seized it after Second World War

It was quite a loud topic and our government didn't bent the knee openly saying it's outrageous

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +3 / -1

Sounds like Poland. Poles are pretty based these days. Where I am, even just saying the word “Jewish” - not even critically, just as identification - will get weird looks. And if you ever said something like, “Jon Stewart isn’t white. He’s Jewish. His real name is Jon Liebowitz” at a party, people will slowly start backing away from you. The fear is palpable that some terrible line has just been crossed. Forget about trying to discuss the Talmud or central banking or the media.

2
RememberKosciuszko [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You guessed it. To clarify - it was property without anyone to claim inheritance and our gov still didn't bend the knee, claiming they have no standing.

Based Poland and all of that, but there is one other reason for this attitude toward Jews - during communist rule legit true anti semitism was rampant.

At first, after the war, socialist government was fighting antisemitism but in the 60's tables turned and they legit encouraged it. And there was a short period of jewish expulsion from Poland.

Weird times.

1
Stefanos 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its about differentiating between legitimate, proportionate criticism, vs the more genocidal lunacy.

They've got big noses. In fact, they would agree.