2334
Comments (431)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
Hardcouer 9 points ago +11 / -2

Haha, RINOs and cucks masquerading as based Christians will hate Steve King for being honest about immigration and BLM, wannabe fascists masquerading as based Christians will hate Steve King for saying Judeo-Christian.

Based conservatives will enjoy his speech, even if they don't like individual bits.

10
Cacciali_Via 10 points ago +10 / -0

I can dislike fascism and Jewish supremacists equally.

8
thealexpkeaton 8 points ago +8 / -0

Love Steve King

4
iDinduNuffin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Odd narrative framing there

2
Hardcouer 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's odd because it's original content :) 80% of opinions are recycled.

3
iDinduNuffin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe conspicuous would've been better than odd

0
Hardcouer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oddness is conspicuous almost by definition.

Quite enjoying all the speeches. Thought Gosar's was the weakest so far. Fuentes has lifted his game since I last listened to him a year back.

1
Hardcouer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Restarted here due to thread depth limits. None of those comments have me saying the word obvious that way. Provide the quote or concede you made that up, liar.

1
iDinduNuffin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saying it what way?

The infiltrators, however, will immediately go off their nut, call King controlled opposition, etc, etc.

Now you're demanding that I provide a list of infiltrators that make it obvious who they are. Good one.

Aside from the deleted comments, there's one right there alleging Fuentes is a Jewish shill.

Look at the top level comments. Not too hard for you. Someone so insanely antisemitic that they think Fuentes and AF are 'Jewish shills' is obviously a single issue nutter.

1
Hardcouer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. The one use of obvious - you claimed 4 - is in the exact opposite sense to how you claimed I used it.