Aristotle's context was someone whose life is better served (or greater utility) when they are told what to do or think.
At the time it was considered that children fell into this category (inexperienced at life), mentally deficient people (unable to fully reason), and women (it's a little bit dated idea, but it related to passions)
Yep, and in other countries we unilaterally made decisions for them that resulted in consequences that we couldn't control. And then we started or continued bombing them for decades.
The easiest way to create a terrorist is to kill his family member. Trump knew this. Terrorism here was at an all time low because we controlled the borders and reduced the killing.
We had to deal with ISIS directly because it was about to become the next caliphate, but this caliphate would've been built solely to destroy the West.
Wrote a paper about 9/11 for my freshman year college english course. Did a pretty deep dive into the history of what we've been doing in the Middle East. Main part was how we have been funding and arming terrorists since the 60s in order to topple one government or fight some forces or another. It's pretty much never stopped. And the kicker is those weapons and funds always wind up in the hands of anti-american terrorists eventually or the "freedom fighters" turn against their government handlers. That's what happened with Al-Qaeda.
"Rockets hit the U.S. base at Erbil International Airport in Iraq’s Kurdish-run region on Feb. 15, killing a contractor and wounding several U.S. personnel."
"Biden authorized attacks on a facility operated by Iranian-backed militias on Thursday night [in response to] rocket attacks on U.S. targets in Iraq."
Regarding whether to believe the official story – I don't know. Do we have media who report honestly? Do we have a government that communicates truth?
It's important to point out that it's alleged they were Iranian backed militia's. In the same article where they run that headline they admit in the body of the text that there's no actual proof of that claim.
OK thx, so thats the story as far as tick for tack is concerned. Good enough for the dimwitted but I am getting curious if it has anything to do with the oil pipeline that goes through Syria.
"Don't you understand? We are building better people, we are building a better country, a better world! We are the good guys and if you disagree, we'll make you better forcibly."
Just the same once-a-generation world view shift that always ends up with some bullshit utopian ideal that gets corporatized, politicized and ends up creating greater systems of overt and covert controls that end up doing far more damage than good, but influences the nation, the people, for years to come until the next time makes it worse still.
I'm surprised no one has said "white Presidents bombing people of color is white supremacy." Instead they'll probably just say "talking about people of color being bombed is white supremacy."
I’d love to hear how not wanting people to be bombed is pro fascist.
Fact of the matter is, we already know that Trump’s bombs were followed by peace. They were a last resort and we also know he intentionally tried to impose the least amount of casualties. With Biden, the only thing we know is the last administration he was part of started multiple new wars, dropped twice as many bombs as George Bush and bombed more countries than any president since FDR (and still got Nobel Peace Prize lmao).
I think I figured it out. To say other countries shouldn't be bombed respects their national sovereignty, which, as we all know, is an inherently nationalistic viewpoint. Any idea that's in line with nationalism is, per their own definition, fascist. Therefore not bombing other countries is fascist. QED
Maybe I’m old fashioned, but I think we should either just leave them the hell alone, or turn the entire ME into an empty parking lot. Anything in between does more harm than good.
The "humanitarian" approach. In the breath before they preached about their desire to put Trump supporters in "reeducation" camps, and the breath before that they expressed their desire to punish and deny services to those who do not abide by COVID restrictions, and in the breath before that they championed citizen rights violations in the name of keeping everyone safe from COVID.
Does it still work? Claiming a civil rights violation as justification for destruction? Does anyone believe it anymore?
i know, they state the thing, in this case "human rights violations" as a means to convince the american public to support bombings. "they are the bad guys", they say, "look at what they are donig."
its an emotional appeal, and they know it works on the general public. Its pathetically transparent and I am surprised it continues to work.
Well, to be fair, when Trump tried to end multiple decade long "wars", liberals were bitching about it, despite Obama promising them dozens of times "no boots on the grind in Syria!"
When I first started, I could barely keep up. Somersaults were nearly impossible!
But I kept on trying to follow leftist thinking, and LOOK AT ME NOW! I'm now a four time Olympic gold medalist of mental gymnastics and can follow even the MOST RIDICULOUS leftist train of thought!
Communist good! Freedom bad! Look at me, MA! I can practically fly!
The government told her the bombing was OK, and because it's not Trump, she agrees and knows all the information to be truthful and accurate.
Aristotle called these people "natural slaves"
It's the appeal to authority fallacy. Leftists seem obsessed with "experts" and take anything they say as truth.
"I read two overpriced textbooks about this subject one semester at college and forgot most of it the next semester... what's your expertise again!?
Calling them slaves implies that they are useful in some way.
Aristotle's context was someone whose life is better served (or greater utility) when they are told what to do or think.
At the time it was considered that children fell into this category (inexperienced at life), mentally deficient people (unable to fully reason), and women (it's a little bit dated idea, but it related to passions)
Just passing on the thoughts.
Their use is to drive normal people to insanity.
Im gonna keep posting the same too, keep calling them out. The pattern is over the top in our faces wtf
America deciding what is and is not allowed in other countries is what has created most of the terrorists, you twat.
America giving weapons, money, and vehicles to the terrorists is what created them.
That's part of it.
As for ISIS. That’s basically all of it. We CREATED a terrorist group because the war pigs didn’t like Assad. Period.
Gotta get that pipeline for your donors.
Yep, and in other countries we unilaterally made decisions for them that resulted in consequences that we couldn't control. And then we started or continued bombing them for decades.
The easiest way to create a terrorist is to kill his family member. Trump knew this. Terrorism here was at an all time low because we controlled the borders and reduced the killing.
We had to deal with ISIS directly because it was about to become the next caliphate, but this caliphate would've been built solely to destroy the West.
Wrote a paper about 9/11 for my freshman year college english course. Did a pretty deep dive into the history of what we've been doing in the Middle East. Main part was how we have been funding and arming terrorists since the 60s in order to topple one government or fight some forces or another. It's pretty much never stopped. And the kicker is those weapons and funds always wind up in the hands of anti-american terrorists eventually or the "freedom fighters" turn against their government handlers. That's what happened with Al-Qaeda.
They know what they’re doing. It’s sick.
Lol If you think bombing Syria is about terrorism.
Before I go talkin about it in public what was the airstrike for?
“Freedom” of course. ;)
"Fweedom"
🤣 that was a new low. I’m losing it.
Cmon I’m lazy and I don’t feel like reading is their a tldr somewhere?
Official story:
"Rockets hit the U.S. base at Erbil International Airport in Iraq’s Kurdish-run region on Feb. 15, killing a contractor and wounding several U.S. personnel."
"Biden authorized attacks on a facility operated by Iranian-backed militias on Thursday night [in response to] rocket attacks on U.S. targets in Iraq."
Regarding whether to believe the official story – I don't know. Do we have media who report honestly? Do we have a government that communicates truth?
It's important to point out that it's alleged they were Iranian backed militia's. In the same article where they run that headline they admit in the body of the text that there's no actual proof of that claim.
OK thx, so thats the story as far as tick for tack is concerned. Good enough for the dimwitted but I am getting curious if it has anything to do with the oil pipeline that goes through Syria.
This. It's fucking public!
Not to mention I could literally find her just through the text itself.
Comes from Twitter where they care about such things
Comes from Twitter where they care about such things
When you say things like "peace is fascism", people should start backing away slowly and locking up sharp objects.
I can't even compute this shit
"Don't you understand? We are building better people, we are building a better country, a better world! We are the good guys and if you disagree, we'll make you better forcibly."
Just the same once-a-generation world view shift that always ends up with some bullshit utopian ideal that gets corporatized, politicized and ends up creating greater systems of overt and covert controls that end up doing far more damage than good, but influences the nation, the people, for years to come until the next time makes it worse still.
We must teach them of our peaceful ways...BY FORCE.
I love how not being fascist is fascist.
Not being racist has been racist for a while now
Wait... if not being fascist is fascists then that means Antifa is...
pi=\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\frac{4}{2n+1}...
...Mother of God.
Now do you see how these types are the first against the wall. How can anyone respect someone who thinks like this?
Why are blacking out the names of people making public tweets? They don't want to be known as fucking morons they can keep their mouths shut.
Never understood this either. I thought it was a public website?
This came from Twitter where they care about such things
Thank you for the explanation.
Goddammit, I have midterms next week. We need an "IQ-draining" flair, ffs.
I'm surprised no one has said "white Presidents bombing people of color is white supremacy." Instead they'll probably just say "talking about people of color being bombed is white supremacy."
This level of stupidity hurts my brain
It’s supposed so you just obey instead.
George Floyd attempted to kill civilians, what's the problem.
Oh he bombed the right people! That makes it okay right? Same with Suleimani right?
Wrong. Suleimani participated in mostly peaceful terrorism
kek
I’d love to hear how not wanting people to be bombed is pro fascist.
Fact of the matter is, we already know that Trump’s bombs were followed by peace. They were a last resort and we also know he intentionally tried to impose the least amount of casualties. With Biden, the only thing we know is the last administration he was part of started multiple new wars, dropped twice as many bombs as George Bush and bombed more countries than any president since FDR (and still got Nobel Peace Prize lmao).
I think I figured it out. To say other countries shouldn't be bombed respects their national sovereignty, which, as we all know, is an inherently nationalistic viewpoint. Any idea that's in line with nationalism is, per their own definition, fascist. Therefore not bombing other countries is fascist. QED
Maybe I’m old fashioned, but I think we should either just leave them the hell alone, or turn the entire ME into an empty parking lot. Anything in between does more harm than good.
The "humanitarian" approach. In the breath before they preached about their desire to put Trump supporters in "reeducation" camps, and the breath before that they expressed their desire to punish and deny services to those who do not abide by COVID restrictions, and in the breath before that they championed citizen rights violations in the name of keeping everyone safe from COVID.
Does it still work? Claiming a civil rights violation as justification for destruction? Does anyone believe it anymore?
They’re riddled with demons.
i know, they state the thing, in this case "human rights violations" as a means to convince the american public to support bombings. "they are the bad guys", they say, "look at what they are donig."
its an emotional appeal, and they know it works on the general public. Its pathetically transparent and I am surprised it continues to work.
The brainwashing is strong with too many. A massive disclosure might wake them up.
if Trump being president didnt expose how slanted the elites are and how media and tech are in bed with them, what will?
No idea.
Well, to be fair, when Trump tried to end multiple decade long "wars", liberals were bitching about it, despite Obama promising them dozens of times "no boots on the grind in Syria!"
Why are you blocking out a name of someone who chose to make a public comment on social media?
This came from Twitter where they care about such things
Stop blacking out names, faggot!
These people are so fucking brain washed, its unbelievable, it just gets worse everyday.
It was a gender neutral bombing so it's cool
Star of david in twitter handle
Galaxy brain
When I first started, I could barely keep up. Somersaults were nearly impossible!
But I kept on trying to follow leftist thinking, and LOOK AT ME NOW! I'm now a four time Olympic gold medalist of mental gymnastics and can follow even the MOST RIDICULOUS leftist train of thought!
Communist good! Freedom bad! Look at me, MA! I can practically fly!
give me a break, they got mad when we killed their military general.
War is peace!
Imagine the mental gymnastics required for picture above. lol
Wonder what she was shrieking when DJT killed the top Iranian general
Every single Twitter user that has the star of david in their profile.... IS AGAINST US.
Have you people noticed yet??
It’s beyond clear at this point these retards have no idea what fascism is
Obey the media. That's all you have to do plebs. Just do as you're told!
Stop thinking!!
Apple is making NPCs now.
..... what?????
Wait... wtf is she saying? If you're a pacifist you're inherently fascist? Holy fucking shit this is retarded.
theyre hilarous statists. literally emperor wearing no clothes