Not a big Fuentas fan, but respect him and the Groypers for showing up for freedom and in a tasteful publicity stunt as well. If we're forced to accept their rules, then that means we're the ones ruled.
Yeah I’d be careful with Nick and guys like him. Since Trump came along, there have been a bevy of people trying to capitalize off of the energy that he brought to the right. The ones that have fan clubs that follow them around like this always end up being jackasses. It’s like Cenk Uygur but for the right.
Exactly, Fuentes was some libertarian dork who decided to jump ship when he saw that thing was done and decided to grift off of the MAGA movement instead. Hes probably even worse than Cenk because Cenk just scams people out of money while Nick convinces people to go full facefag and self doxx themselves while shilling white nationalist ideas.
Remember Chris Cantwell? The ancap libertarian turned Alt-Righter in a similar fashion to Fuentes? All he ended up doing was convincing a bunch of people to ruin their lives on some useless Beer Hall Putsch LARP sessions and turning himself into a fed informant.
Chris was just one of the many faggots that I am talking about. Chris gives me that same vibe. He is not one of us. But boy does he love the idea that we might give him our money.
When Fuentes was a libertarian he had a gravy train laid out infront of him. He could have been at the daily wire, running some group like TPUSA for insiders. He gave that all up for YouTube channel with a few hundred viewers when he questioned his beliefs. What he did was not the logical path for a grifter. He has money but not million dollar mansion in DC money that he'd have if he went with the RINO establishment.
He was what 17 in 2016? Who's beliefs don't change from 17. I was a ancap at that age, a huge amount of us got here because of Ron Paul. Could be worse before that I was a Pro George Bush neo-con! Pro McCain too. I was just a teen, I hadn't really formed my own opinions yet just followed what I was raised with I guess. Those are formative years.
When was he ever offered a job at Daily Wire or TPUSA? He was some just some corny libertarian dork who saw that wasnt going anywhere so he leaned hard into the Alt-Right stuff back when that was the hot new thing to try and capitalize on it. Thats how he makes money and sells shirts ect.
And you cant use this bullshit "he was just a kid going through a phase!" excuse when hes now 22 and into White Nationalism and Nazi apologist revisionist history. Hes just another Alt Right left over who grifts off of people, only an absolute retard would think this will translate into anything real in the political world. And it would be whatever if it was just that, but he makes calls for real life marches or get togethers that always result in people getting doxxed. Some poor stupid 18 year old gets high on this shit, goes out to some rally and has his life ruined forever, but its okay because Nick made his money anyway and got some publicity out of it so whatever.
I've been giving substantive replies to substantive comments you get what you put in and you put in flippant adhonim and insults.
corny libertarian dork
grifter
absolute retard
These don't warrant substantive replies so you didn't get them. You came off as too butthurt to not drag the level down.
no no you can't go to stop the steal!
He's upfront with his followers about the risks of IRL events, the fact he sells shirts cause he basically black listed from any job, which is what they want for everyone who isn't RINO but whatever.
that dude was so gay he was wearing two masks, homo. cpac really isn't conservative its conservative like lincoln project is, aka matt shlapp is a faggot backstabbing jerkoff.
He will get a few million dollars off of a book deal and then disappear into obscurity. We had a whole bunch of these faggots in 2015-2016. They all went away shortly after Trump entered office and everyone realized that Trump was the only one who knew what he was doing.
Truth .
But then again he was backed / pushed by , an actual organization (Breitbart.com / Steve Bannon ) , which allowed him a lot more reach then Fuentes (for better or for worse) has .
Milo also had a sort of charisma that had many younger conservatives / alt-right go : "yeah , he's a gay guy , but he's our gay guy" -- again for better or for worse , depends of your point of view -- and he , along with say Dave Rubin , or the Peter Thiel (co-inventor of paypal -- whom Trump brought to CPAC as a speaker) have helped ... well how should I put this ... -- drag the Republican party into the 20th century , by publicly showing acceptance for moderate gays .
What the hell are you talking about? Nick just held a successful in-person conference of over 500 people where people discussed ACTUAL conservatism: Restricting immigration, big tech censorship, and getting serious about America First policies.
a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.
AMERICA First!!!!
Nick Fuentes considers himself a "WHITE NATIONALIST."
What does that mean? It means he sees "RACE" outside of being white, as being a potential NATIONAL PROBLEM.
HE strongly identifies with his own RACE and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other RACES. THIS IS WHITE SUPREMICIST IDEOLOGY.
Be very careful with whom you agree with. MOST conservatives distance themselves from him for obvious reasons.
The MAGA movement (and I hope I speak for every Trump supporter) does not want to be associated in ANY WAY to those who have white supremacy ideology, not even to agree with something as simple as mask wearing, because the left will then point a finger at us and say, "SEE, those Trump supporters agree with a white supremacist, therfore THEY are white supremacists!"
I don't wear masks, and I laugh at the fags in this video who ARE wearing them, BUT...............FUCK NICK FUENTES!
He does not that's a lie he's never identified as a white nationalist.
No white nationalist would have a Filipino like Michelle Maulkin as part of thier movement, have a black person speak at thier event. Talk about thier love of all races, appreciate black music, culture and thier part in American history.
Nick Fuentes crusades against anti white BS.
The Founding Fathers policy on citizenship was "Free white men of good character" were eligible. So does that make the Founding Fathers "white nationalists"? Would they be let into CPAC? Would you cancel them?
“The reason I wouldn’t call myself a white nationalist — it’s not because I don’t see the necessity for white people to have a homeland and for white people to have a country,” Fuentes said. “It’s because I think that kind of terminology is used almost exclusively by the left to defame and I think the terminology and the labels that we use — I don’t think that we can look at them outside of the context of their connotations in America.”
So yeah he doesnt call himself that. Were the Founding Fathers white nationalists?
Benjamin Franklin counted most Europeans as too swarthy to immigrate. Almost all other Founding Fathers agreed that only whites should be citizens and imagined citizenship would never be granted to anyone besides whites. Fuentes's position is far more moderate if he is a white nationalist the the Founding Fathers are.
An accurate definition of a white nationalist is someone for whom citizenship is dependent on ethnicity, where other groups would be stripped of citizenship and perhaps even removed.
Nick does not say non whites should be stripped of citizenship, he does not say only whites should be in the US, but it should be recocognised that at its core it's a white nation. Just as Russia is despite the long presence of other groups. Hence he would have Jon Miller and Michelle Maulkin on stage, where as no white nationalist would.
He's never subscribed to white nationalism, which as he said is mostly used as a smear to lable consevatives like Steve Bannon, John Miller all the best people in Trumps cabinet etc.
Nick 'Catboy' Fuentes calling anyone else gay is really something else, especially since his main friends include people like the guy who shoves dildos down his throat while dressed like a school girl while in black face and being Milos catamite.
All joking aside Fuentes sucks and and is retarded, deal with it zoomers.
lmao, Nick calling anyone gay after he liked a post by a literal tranny saying traps aren't gay and waffled on for a minute and a half about how traps aren't gay but... and spent his supporters' money on flying a bisexual catboy in from Australia for a gay date
People say this and yet he gets more popular and runs successful events year after year, even with mass de-platforming. For fucks sake he's banned off YT, Twitch, Dlive, instagram, and managed to get both a current and former state rep to speak at a political conference he organized and streamed on his own platform. You're blind if you don't recognize his success.
I care. How does talking about how kissing your faggot catboy on the lips and showering naked together would totally not be gay help us win the culture war?
Been saying this since the gay marriage movement was gaining steam. As soon as we legalized it, and made the degeneracy normal we opened the doors for the tranny's and other freaks.
Pretty sad that this dude is more concerned about a fantasy gay date than changing the political conversation. Biggest faggot I've ever seen. I wish he finds the dick that he wants to suck already so he'll stop sniveling like a twink boy on this forum refreshing the new page searching for Nick Fuentes posts to comment on. It's pretty sad if you ask me. Unfortunately, I was not able to see his episodes when I posted my AFPAC post. It would be cool if everyone witness how retarded and gay this sad asshole is.
If a fag* voted for President Trump, I have no problem with that fag. If a fag* voted for Resident Biden, I have no problem with that fag.
If EITHER of those fags* calls me a homophobe because I refuse to partake or approve of their sexual debauchery, THEN I have a problem with THAT fag*.
The left are the party of intolerance.
Real conservatism accepts everyone until there is a genuine reason not to.
President Trump may not agree with the gay lifestyle, but he accepts them, because they are FREE to do what they want. If a fag* tried to convince Barron that he's gay, I'm pretty sure THAT FAGGOT'S intentions would NOT be tolerated by Trump.
CONSERVATIVES CALL THE LEFTIES OUT FOR INTOLERANCE. If a liberal or Democrat comes to patriots.win because they see the intolerance in their party and want an alternative, and see fags* like you being intolerant, CONGRATS for black-pilling someone who had the potential to be red-pilled.
If you are a lefty shill, fuck off with you for trying to create chaos. If you're NOT a lefty shill then get your shit together. You make us look like the homophobes that the left calls us.
*this site IS NOT politically correct, FYI for newbies.
Invoking the Bible to justify your comment?
Why didn't you use the Bible reference to begin with?
Instead you say > Fags get the helicopter
That implies YOU are going to judge, then sentence someone to death and then throw them out of a helicopter.
Yet the Bible says:
But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him. For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.”
As Christians, we are commanded to love. That doesn't mean we excuse sinful behavior, but it does mean we listen, understand, and sacrifice our own comfort and preconceived ideas to represent Christ well. I discovered years ago about the importance of listening before condemning, and of offering the same grace that Christ shows me in spite of all my faults and shortcomings. In THIS WAY ONLY, can you lead a sinner to Christ.
How many times are you going to do this? Imagine caring more about a gay date than saving the country. Maybe you're the retarded faggot. Actually, you are.
It's ok, he only spent his supporters' money on flying a catboy who inhales horsecock dildos in from Australia and housing him ironically so they can stare into each others' eyes and talk about how totally not gay they are ironically.
The "I was just pretending to be a faggot" excuse can only go so far until you realize you really are just a faggot.
Nick has nothing interesting to say or any insights into politics. Keep in mind he initially hated Trump because "hes not libertarian enough" but then quickly moved onto just spouting pol/quasi stormfag memes back at his audience. Now his whole "movement" ocolates between hating MAGA people as cuck jew shills while also desperately trying to ride the coatails of it into relevancy.
Hes a grifting bafoon who cons middle class midwit zoomers by repeating naughty memes with a wink and a smile about how the holocaust never happened and they lap it up. Any chance he did have was during the whole groypinging of Charlie Kirk, but of course they fucked that up almost immediately too and everyones already forgotten about it.
This dude makes it his mission to comment on every Nick post on this forum about his gay fantasies. This guy is the gayest faggot I've ever seen on the internet.
He didn't house him that's total bs, nor did he pay for his flight, he dropped him off somewhere and drove off. They didn't share accommodation.
That guy was visiting his now wife.
Nick was trying to convince him to quite the degenerate stuff, he told him it was gross and a undignified way to get laughs. He told him he should embrace Christ and a Christian life style also tried to convince him not to go down the nihilistic alt-right route. That obviously didn't work but it's not a bad thing trying to save someone on the wrong path from themselves. It's just guilt by association. If he condoned that behavior you'd have a point but he condemned it.
I had a look for the videos but YouTube must have deleted them and I'm not gonna trawl through a 10hr irl stream but I know what I saw.
If you don't trust me that's fine, but making the claim that something gay happened is a big claim. I would say find the proof of that before throwing it around. Try and find footage of them co-habitating, you won't, if anything like that happened that would not be deleted. As is the claim he paid for his flight and hotel, Nick is private with his finances there is no way anyone has receipts that's something bread tube leftist made up.
The top cop there wearing two masks is the absolute state of the GoP
They literally can't bend over quick enough.
We all approve!!!
FUCK YEA!!!! AMERICA FIRST. FUCK YOUR MASKS!!!
Not a big Fuentas fan, but respect him and the Groypers for showing up for freedom and in a tasteful publicity stunt as well. If we're forced to accept their rules, then that means we're the ones ruled.
Yeah I’d be careful with Nick and guys like him. Since Trump came along, there have been a bevy of people trying to capitalize off of the energy that he brought to the right. The ones that have fan clubs that follow them around like this always end up being jackasses. It’s like Cenk Uygur but for the right.
Exactly, Fuentes was some libertarian dork who decided to jump ship when he saw that thing was done and decided to grift off of the MAGA movement instead. Hes probably even worse than Cenk because Cenk just scams people out of money while Nick convinces people to go full facefag and self doxx themselves while shilling white nationalist ideas.
Remember Chris Cantwell? The ancap libertarian turned Alt-Righter in a similar fashion to Fuentes? All he ended up doing was convincing a bunch of people to ruin their lives on some useless Beer Hall Putsch LARP sessions and turning himself into a fed informant.
Chris was just one of the many faggots that I am talking about. Chris gives me that same vibe. He is not one of us. But boy does he love the idea that we might give him our money.
When Fuentes was a libertarian he had a gravy train laid out infront of him. He could have been at the daily wire, running some group like TPUSA for insiders. He gave that all up for YouTube channel with a few hundred viewers when he questioned his beliefs. What he did was not the logical path for a grifter. He has money but not million dollar mansion in DC money that he'd have if he went with the RINO establishment.
He was what 17 in 2016? Who's beliefs don't change from 17. I was a ancap at that age, a huge amount of us got here because of Ron Paul. Could be worse before that I was a Pro George Bush neo-con! Pro McCain too. I was just a teen, I hadn't really formed my own opinions yet just followed what I was raised with I guess. Those are formative years.
When was he ever offered a job at Daily Wire or TPUSA? He was some just some corny libertarian dork who saw that wasnt going anywhere so he leaned hard into the Alt-Right stuff back when that was the hot new thing to try and capitalize on it. Thats how he makes money and sells shirts ect.
And you cant use this bullshit "he was just a kid going through a phase!" excuse when hes now 22 and into White Nationalism and Nazi apologist revisionist history. Hes just another Alt Right left over who grifts off of people, only an absolute retard would think this will translate into anything real in the political world. And it would be whatever if it was just that, but he makes calls for real life marches or get togethers that always result in people getting doxxed. Some poor stupid 18 year old gets high on this shit, goes out to some rally and has his life ruined forever, but its okay because Nick made his money anyway and got some publicity out of it so whatever.
He hosted for RSBN.
LMAO you are so butthurt. You're like the people that seethe over Trumps Muslim ban.
I think you guys are butthurt because Im calling out why Nick sucks and all you can manage to do is respond with impotent shitposting.
I've been giving substantive replies to substantive comments you get what you put in and you put in flippant adhonim and insults.
These don't warrant substantive replies so you didn't get them. You came off as too butthurt to not drag the level down.
He's upfront with his followers about the risks of IRL events, the fact he sells shirts cause he basically black listed from any job, which is what they want for everyone who isn't RINO but whatever.
Show us on the doll where big nick touched you, faggot
Notice how nicks zoomer fanboys have nothing to say other than just "s-shut up!"
Stay mad bitch.
Fuentes is a faggot
Fuentes is a homosex catboy loving grifter that senses an opportunity to 'build a brand' and siphon money from well meaning dupes.
Honestly, he smells like a plant more than anything else to me.
that dude was so gay he was wearing two masks, homo. cpac really isn't conservative its conservative like lincoln project is, aka matt shlapp is a faggot backstabbing jerkoff.
I just like that he's spreading the good word of Fake N Gay
MAKE CONSERVATISM FUN AGAIN!
CPAC shills in full force up in this post....
You have to wear masks at CPAC?! That’s fucking gay alright. Fuck them.
What do you expect from Conservative,incorporated-PAC??
Look at all those faggots muzzled up.
GAAAYYYYY lmao
Fuentes is fucking General Based. Put that motherfucker in office somewhere, probably POTUS.
He's the Zoomer Milo. He'll conserve and acheive nothing while being a grifting faggot.
He will get a few million dollars off of a book deal and then disappear into obscurity. We had a whole bunch of these faggots in 2015-2016. They all went away shortly after Trump entered office and everyone realized that Trump was the only one who knew what he was doing.
Nah, Milo actually red-pilled a lot of people. Fuentes is a pure faggot grifter
Truth . But then again he was backed / pushed by , an actual organization (Breitbart.com / Steve Bannon ) , which allowed him a lot more reach then Fuentes (for better or for worse) has .
Milo also had a sort of charisma that had many younger conservatives / alt-right go : "yeah , he's a gay guy , but he's our gay guy" -- again for better or for worse , depends of your point of view -- and he , along with say Dave Rubin , or the Peter Thiel (co-inventor of paypal -- whom Trump brought to CPAC as a speaker) have helped ... well how should I put this ... -- drag the Republican party into the 20th century , by publicly showing acceptance for moderate gays .
What the hell are you talking about? Nick just held a successful in-person conference of over 500 people where people discussed ACTUAL conservatism: Restricting immigration, big tech censorship, and getting serious about America First policies.
who?
No one important. Just some random faggot troll
Alex Jones likes Fuentes, so he’s good in my book.
AF!
yikes Fuentes is a tool. I will never understand his appeal and dont want him the face of any movement im in.
I get it, but what are they supposed to do? You want them to get shut down before Trump speaks?
We Conservatives consider ourselves Nationalists.
na·tion·al·ist
a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.
AMERICA First!!!!
Nick Fuentes considers himself a "WHITE NATIONALIST."
What does that mean? It means he sees "RACE" outside of being white, as being a potential NATIONAL PROBLEM.
HE strongly identifies with his own RACE and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other RACES. THIS IS WHITE SUPREMICIST IDEOLOGY.
Be very careful with whom you agree with. MOST conservatives distance themselves from him for obvious reasons.
The MAGA movement (and I hope I speak for every Trump supporter) does not want to be associated in ANY WAY to those who have white supremacy ideology, not even to agree with something as simple as mask wearing, because the left will then point a finger at us and say, "SEE, those Trump supporters agree with a white supremacist, therfore THEY are white supremacists!"
I don't wear masks, and I laugh at the fags in this video who ARE wearing them, BUT...............FUCK NICK FUENTES!
He does not that's a lie he's never identified as a white nationalist.
No white nationalist would have a Filipino like Michelle Maulkin as part of thier movement, have a black person speak at thier event. Talk about thier love of all races, appreciate black music, culture and thier part in American history.
Nick Fuentes crusades against anti white BS.
The Founding Fathers policy on citizenship was "Free white men of good character" were eligible. So does that make the Founding Fathers "white nationalists"? Would they be let into CPAC? Would you cancel them?
“The reason I wouldn’t call myself a white nationalist — it’s not because I don’t see the necessity for white people to have a homeland and for white people to have a country,” Fuentes said. “It’s because I think that kind of terminology is used almost exclusively by the left to defame and I think the terminology and the labels that we use — I don’t think that we can look at them outside of the context of their connotations in America.”
So yeah he doesnt call himself that. Were the Founding Fathers white nationalists?
Benjamin Franklin counted most Europeans as too swarthy to immigrate. Almost all other Founding Fathers agreed that only whites should be citizens and imagined citizenship would never be granted to anyone besides whites. Fuentes's position is far more moderate if he is a white nationalist the the Founding Fathers are.
An accurate definition of a white nationalist is someone for whom citizenship is dependent on ethnicity, where other groups would be stripped of citizenship and perhaps even removed. Nick does not say non whites should be stripped of citizenship, he does not say only whites should be in the US, but it should be recocognised that at its core it's a white nation. Just as Russia is despite the long presence of other groups. Hence he would have Jon Miller and Michelle Maulkin on stage, where as no white nationalist would.
He's never subscribed to white nationalism, which as he said is mostly used as a smear to lable consevatives like Steve Bannon, John Miller all the best people in Trumps cabinet etc.
Nick 'Catboy' Fuentes calling anyone else gay is really something else, especially since his main friends include people like the guy who shoves dildos down his throat while dressed like a school girl while in black face and being Milos catamite.
All joking aside Fuentes sucks and and is retarded, deal with it zoomers.
Whatever you say faggot shill
lmao, Nick calling anyone gay after he liked a post by a literal tranny saying traps aren't gay and waffled on for a minute and a half about how traps aren't gay but... and spent his supporters' money on flying a bisexual catboy in from Australia for a gay date
Oh my god, who cares? Sounds like dumb high school gossip.
Nick Fuentes is an asshole grifter who is going to go down in flames.
People say this and yet he gets more popular and runs successful events year after year, even with mass de-platforming. For fucks sake he's banned off YT, Twitch, Dlive, instagram, and managed to get both a current and former state rep to speak at a political conference he organized and streamed on his own platform. You're blind if you don't recognize his success.
I care. How does talking about how kissing your faggot catboy on the lips and showering naked together would totally not be gay help us win the culture war?
Well, maybe he’s gay?? 🤷🏼♂️ Seems from the video that he’s doing more than most of us in fighting the culture war.
So how does being a literal faggot help us win the culture war? Very based and tradcath, not at all massively hypocritical.
Ohhh. You’re one of those people. Nah, I’m good. I’m not going down that road lmfao
You'd rather embrace left-wing values but just a few years behind them and ultimately conserve nothing? That's called losing the culture war.
Been saying this since the gay marriage movement was gaining steam. As soon as we legalized it, and made the degeneracy normal we opened the doors for the tranny's and other freaks.
Pretty sad that this dude is more concerned about a fantasy gay date than changing the political conversation. Biggest faggot I've ever seen. I wish he finds the dick that he wants to suck already so he'll stop sniveling like a twink boy on this forum refreshing the new page searching for Nick Fuentes posts to comment on. It's pretty sad if you ask me. Unfortunately, I was not able to see his episodes when I posted my AFPAC post. It would be cool if everyone witness how retarded and gay this sad asshole is.
BINGO! HUGE BINGO.
In other news, Nick Fuentes can do as he pleases. He will not get my money, and I will do my best to convince others not to give him theirs.
Why? Because friends don't let friends waste their motherfucking cash.
If a fag* voted for President Trump, I have no problem with that fag. If a fag* voted for Resident Biden, I have no problem with that fag.
If EITHER of those fags* calls me a homophobe because I refuse to partake or approve of their sexual debauchery, THEN I have a problem with THAT fag*.
The left are the party of intolerance.
Real conservatism accepts everyone until there is a genuine reason not to.
President Trump may not agree with the gay lifestyle, but he accepts them, because they are FREE to do what they want. If a fag* tried to convince Barron that he's gay, I'm pretty sure THAT FAGGOT'S intentions would NOT be tolerated by Trump.
CONSERVATIVES CALL THE LEFTIES OUT FOR INTOLERANCE. If a liberal or Democrat comes to patriots.win because they see the intolerance in their party and want an alternative, and see fags* like you being intolerant, CONGRATS for black-pilling someone who had the potential to be red-pilled.
If you are a lefty shill, fuck off with you for trying to create chaos. If you're NOT a lefty shill then get your shit together. You make us look like the homophobes that the left calls us.
*this site IS NOT politically correct, FYI for newbies.
Invoking the Bible to justify your comment? Why didn't you use the Bible reference to begin with?
Instead you say > Fags get the helicopter
That implies YOU are going to judge, then sentence someone to death and then throw them out of a helicopter.
Yet the Bible says: But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him. For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.”
As Christians, we are commanded to love. That doesn't mean we excuse sinful behavior, but it does mean we listen, understand, and sacrifice our own comfort and preconceived ideas to represent Christ well. I discovered years ago about the importance of listening before condemning, and of offering the same grace that Christ shows me in spite of all my faults and shortcomings. In THIS WAY ONLY, can you lead a sinner to Christ.
He's not a doctor. He is a psychiatrist LMAO
How many times are you going to do this? Imagine caring more about a gay date than saving the country. Maybe you're the retarded faggot. Actually, you are.
Most of the gay conservative community is already aware that Nick Fuentes is gay.
As long as he keeps the other mask off.
If traps aren't gay then a blind man fucking a guy isn't gay either.
It’s not. It’s only gay if you like it. Lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3reKRHcyA0
Now that said...
Don't forget to look at that archive link in the description for proof.
It's ok, he only spent his supporters' money on flying a catboy who inhales horsecock dildos in from Australia and housing him ironically so they can stare into each others' eyes and talk about how totally not gay they are ironically.
The "I was just pretending to be a faggot" excuse can only go so far until you realize you really are just a faggot.
Nick has nothing interesting to say or any insights into politics. Keep in mind he initially hated Trump because "hes not libertarian enough" but then quickly moved onto just spouting pol/quasi stormfag memes back at his audience. Now his whole "movement" ocolates between hating MAGA people as cuck jew shills while also desperately trying to ride the coatails of it into relevancy.
Hes a grifting bafoon who cons middle class midwit zoomers by repeating naughty memes with a wink and a smile about how the holocaust never happened and they lap it up. Any chance he did have was during the whole groypinging of Charlie Kirk, but of course they fucked that up almost immediately too and everyones already forgotten about it.
Charlie Kirk is a corny, milktoast conservative though.
This dude makes it his mission to comment on every Nick post on this forum about his gay fantasies. This guy is the gayest faggot I've ever seen on the internet.
He didn't house him that's total bs, nor did he pay for his flight, he dropped him off somewhere and drove off. They didn't share accommodation.
That guy was visiting his now wife.
Nick was trying to convince him to quite the degenerate stuff, he told him it was gross and a undignified way to get laughs. He told him he should embrace Christ and a Christian life style also tried to convince him not to go down the nihilistic alt-right route. That obviously didn't work but it's not a bad thing trying to save someone on the wrong path from themselves. It's just guilt by association. If he condoned that behavior you'd have a point but he condemned it.
Give me a timestamp or a clip where that came up.
I had a look for the videos but YouTube must have deleted them and I'm not gonna trawl through a 10hr irl stream but I know what I saw.
If you don't trust me that's fine, but making the claim that something gay happened is a big claim. I would say find the proof of that before throwing it around. Try and find footage of them co-habitating, you won't, if anything like that happened that would not be deleted. As is the claim he paid for his flight and hotel, Nick is private with his finances there is no way anyone has receipts that's something bread tube leftist made up.
Why are you so concerned about whether he is gay or not do you want to suck him off?