Johnson and Johnson admits it’s single-use COVID vaccine is only 66% effective.
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
If someone has to get a shot (vulnerable population) I'd still rather them take this single-shot non-mRNA one, even if it is technically less effective. And actually 64% is not far off from the flu vaccine effectiveness rate.
https://pastelink.net/vaccinedeaths
“WHO is a front for these depopulation interests.” July 9 2007, “Jon Rappoport interview of ex vaccine researcher” — https://archive.vn/o7u59
Yeah. And it doesn't kill you.
Hey, if it doesn't kill you, it's better than the others.
Source
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/02/27/fda-approves-jjs-single-shot-covid-vaccine-for-emergency-use.html
I think they are missing a 6 off that percent
And yet they still think you should take it annually.
Feb 9 2020, (efficacy single shot reported 66%) “J&J CEO says people may need annual COVID-19 vaccine shots for next several years” — https://archive.vn/QIqiC
Exactly like the flu shot, people in the vulnerable population are recommended to get it annually. Considering this virus is like the flu (or perhaps is just the flu), then this doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Treating the China Virus like the flu is what we should be doing as a society.
Maybe, if it was an actual “vaccine” and actual vaccines were good for ya, but it’s not and they’re not. Most up to date PDF Compilation of vaccine articles. Feb 25 2021: https://files.catbox.moe/s6m5ds.pdf
Newest Additional Resource:https://pastelink.net/vaccinedeaths