1911
Comments (77)
sorted by:
75
Tw0d 75 points ago +77 / -2

That has been out for a long time.

34
War_Hamster 34 points ago +36 / -2

How long? I'm skeptical about all "bombshells" until concrete evidence is given.

52
GlacialSpeed 52 points ago +53 / -1

They "stopped" counting across 6 states overnight and lied about why they stopped.

Matt Braynard found enough non-electronic fraud to change the election outcome.

On top of that the forensic audit of voting machines found the manually changed vote logs (60% of all votes) were wiped for 2020 only but remained for other years.

This election was a complete fraud

21
War_Hamster 21 points ago +21 / -0

Everything you said is true.

Still waiting to see some actions.

11
Tommyjet 11 points ago +11 / -0

Don't hold your breath. FBI, CIA and AG office have no intention on doing anything about it.

9
BlueKentuckyGirl 9 points ago +9 / -0

Or SCOTUS

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agreed. I'd consider it a miracle if we actually had enough good actors left in DC for any remedies to come from there.

You never know, but I'm proceeding as if we have to do this ourselves.

1
GlacialSpeed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me too.

But I'm on my way to becoming a republican party official in my county.

Time for us all to be the change we need. Nobody's going to do it for us while we're all out fishing and hunting.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good for you. I've answered the call as well. I can't run for office so I'm working on grass roots organizing.

2
GlacialSpeed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the effort, every day I see MAGA hats still and I remember we're the majority.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

And we are growing every day. We took a gut punch, but are coming back stronger than ever. This is the way.

0
bdailey1965USA 0 points ago +2 / -2

you expect the people in control to punish themselves......how sweet...Santa will bring you justice for Christmas

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did I say anything about expectations?

Your cynicism is warranted, but why direct it at my comment? I expressed skepticism.

2
Husky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where's that 60% number inclusive of, a precinct, a state?

46
DodoBird 46 points ago +55 / -9

It's a picture. It doesn't prove anything.

33
Fuck_The_NWO 33 points ago +36 / -3

Doesn't matter even if it did prove something. We have more than enough evidence that fuckery happened, not a damn thing is done about any of it. All more evidence does is rub it in our faces.

9
MagaChief 9 points ago +11 / -2

Silly me. I thought photographs of things proved the thing existed. Along with sworn witness testimony of those things being used in voting places. Would you say photos of dead bodies on the streets or in concentration camps didn’t help prove a crime was committed?

5
CloudIX 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's pretty easy these days to put a dead body in the street via photoshop

2
HocusLocus 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's pretty easy these days to put a dead body in the street via photoshop

Or (to add to your good example) remove a dead body from a wedding photo... if it's the one that turned out the best and the bride's face is radiant.

1
Make_More 1 point ago +2 / -1

That is not a valid argument for why all photos can't be trusted. If you want to state that a photo is not true then you need to prove why it's not true.

1
CloudIX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Believe every photo you see then. I don't need to prove anything to you lol

0
Make_More 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes, I'm right because you need to be able to backup a claim with proof. Else you are just making an arbitrary claim.

1
CloudIX 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not claiming anything except that it's easy to put a dead body in the street via Photoshop lol. If you think every photo you see on the internet is real then you're gonna have issues. If you want proof of what I'm claiming then just fucking look it up. You're on the internet for fucks sake lol

2
HocusLocus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought photographs of things proved the thing existed.

IF it has a silver emulsion and it is a positive (Polaroid) and there are two shots taken moments apart (to prove via parallax of distant objects it isn't a 2 dimensional scene) ... or if it's a print of a negative with silver emulsion and the negative is available that matches perfectly with the print.

Now digital cameras either expensively capture scenes with no compression artifacts -- in which case retouching is trivial because the camera contributes no unique forensic information to the photo ... or compress their CCD output for memory storage with an off-the-shelf JPG algo that even if not off the shelf, can be reverse-engineered from camera firmware, then the firmware emulated on a desktop computer to 'that-camrify' any raw digital photo. Meta info embedded in the photo is a joke because no camera ever cryptographically signed its meta info and even if it did the same reverse firmware trick would give you the keys and the certs to re-sign whenever you wish anyway.

The short of it is a digital camera needs to be from its original design, JUST AS hardened and epoxied and tamper-proofed and 'unflashable' as the crypto card that is holding your million dollars of bitcoin -- no one has ever bothered because no one is willing to pay for features like that. And if someone does claim their product is like that... who are you going to hire to test their claim? It would have to be someone else who has also built a similar device.

(A computer guy who loves computers but doesn't trust them)

3
HocusLocus 3 points ago +3 / -0

IF it has a silver emulsion and it is a positive (Polaroid) and there are two shots taken moments apart (to prove via parallax of distant objects it isn't a 2 dimensional scene) ...

And there's the final rub --- because it is now possible to use digital technology and high resolution Gaussian printing to produce two or more 2-dimentional backdrops with a fake-constructed scene that shows 'distant' objects as they might be seen if the camera moved a couple inches... with greater resolution distance to the 2D backdrop, than silver emulsion ever delivered. All plastic substrate has manufactured resolution grain limits, the only possible exception to this is perhaps a Mathew Brady 19th century glass negative that was the result of precision glass swabbed with a veritable 'deep ocean' of silver emulsion liquid, and long exposure pinhole camera obscura. On those glass negatives you can read the headlines and large type of a newspaper tacked to the wall almost a block away.

8
fegeline 8 points ago +8 / -0

Truckers has witnessed about boxes with pre filled ballots, hundreds of thousands of fake pre filled ballots in their cargo while driving from harbor cities like NY and LA inland to the swing states specifically.

They also say that upon arrival the cargo wasn't received in the normal way, they where not allowed to sign the delivery (because the cheaters didn't want any written evidence) but this also caused them to not get paid.

There's likely printing facilities in the US as well, especially considering all the strange bombings and fires that for no apparent reason just happened to start within printing facilities just after the election. These types of facilities does not just explode or start to burn randomly.

2
Thep1mp 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, but in combination with other evidence it’s pretty clear fraud happened. By this point, if you don’t see that you are either a complicit shill who just likes the result or you are stupid- possibly both.

1
9Norwegian8 1 point ago +1 / -0

A scan of the imagie gives 2 results linking to Alibaba.

30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
19
Bonami 19 points ago +20 / -1

Do you have a link, those sheets on the pallets don't look like ballots

10
minotaurbeach [S] 10 points ago +13 / -3

It is on a reliable channel on telegram, but waiting for clearer photos of ballots.

Someone is claiming that they were paid to print 'Biden' ballots. This may have been a major reason every swing state prevented the physical ballots from being counted, -they were clearly off a printer-fake

16
Bonami 16 points ago +17 / -1

They did find that receipt from a Chinese Printing company in one shredder. So yes, I think your right.

3
QLARP 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rookie move printing a receipt and put it in the box with the ballots lol

2
minotaurbeach [S] 2 points ago +4 / -2

https://archive.is/osK7i moar evidence, fight the communist power!

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +3 / -1

Is that verified?

2
Bonami 2 points ago +2 / -0

There were photos at the time, I recall the source as entirely valid and believable

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've seen the credible video of the Chinese activist talking about this. If you could reproduce a link to those photos, that would be great.

This story intrigues me because International shipping leaves a massive paper trail. Too massive to completely cover up. This could be proven.

2
2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice work.

I recall this now. If Patrick Byrne is convinced this is real, I'm inclined to believe him. I've got reason to believe he's very legit.

0
minotaurbeach [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

I have seen evidence that leads me to here

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

This looks interesting. I'm not convinced yet it's not a hoax, but I'll keep an open mind.

Thanks for the interesting link.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is pure gold. Thanks.

Is it verified?

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean....there's a freakin paper trail.

This could be a death blow if it could be investigated and was real.

7
Dialectic 7 points ago +7 / -0

You can't identify shit in this photo for fuck sake.

What're you doing, some CSI "enhance enhance ENHANCE" shit?

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
fponick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Accurate, objective. I followed her on Twitter. Thanks for being brave enough to post this link! 🇺🇸

6
no_more_commie_lies 6 points ago +7 / -1

Yes, we want this to be true BUT...the whistleblower has to show bank accounts, transactions, invoices, entities, people, timestamps, shipping receipts, tracking numbers.. sure these things existed at one point in time. But just photos or bits and pieces to the puzzle dont help pin the tail on the donkey. Need hard evidence.

4
VickiKAG 4 points ago +5 / -1

Evidence?

9
NoTimeToBleed 9 points ago +9 / -0

What? One grainy photo not doing it for you?

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Who needs context?

4
RampRat43 4 points ago +4 / -0

DON'T YOU ALL OR WE ALL JUST LOVE HOW THE UNPPER ECHELONS OF THE U.S. MILITARY JUST IGNOR THEIR OATH! THE ONE ALL WE VETS TOOK, ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOSMESTIC?

MARK MILLEY ET AL WHAT A WASTE YOU WEAK KNEED PEOPLE ARE

3
RexCollumSilvarum 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you look closely, the Biden circles have already been filled in.

3
mailinvoter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn't all this "evidence" of election fraud all moot? Our SC said so. For real though, how can we have all this evidence of voter fraud and have people tell us "meh, what are you going to do? Xiden is already in office. Just wait until next time." This is the most aggravating part that doesn't make sense to have a mush brain cheater making decisions that are destroying our country.

1
WildRiot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because really truly seriously... orange man bad make all crime againsr him ok

2
pedeypete 2 points ago +2 / -0

All of the Supreme Court Justices toured the plant, didn't see anything out of the ordinary.

1
WildRiot 1 point ago +1 / -0

They had to escorts throughout the “tour”

2
bdailey1965USA 2 points ago +2 / -0

We can not talk about fraud because there IS fraud....Ruby Freeman's black table ballots at the Alliant energy center in Georgia is in "the past"...Clown World....I'm excited to be moving to S.D. in spring....my daughter is moving to Florida in April...Colorado has fake voting....everyone votes for other people...mail in...Republicans will never be allowed to win again

2
lenchodahated 2 points ago +2 / -0

fuck

2
JackAubreyRN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doesn't matter that this is old news to us--it's new news to many. Just show people the pix and share the links.

2
Scankles 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hillary tried to steal the election in 2016. She didn't have enough pallets of Chinese ballots. That is why DC is a war zone. The bastards ran a successful coup.

2
digitalher0 2 points ago +2 / -0

A few months from now everyone in the world will know what happened here, as if most already don't but it will be beyond a shadow of any doubt.

2
DrinkLikeAGilmore 2 points ago +2 / -0

How much more evidence do you think it will take to make any changes to our current situation? I think we need better people that are sitting in positions to actually DO anything with all the evidence rather than ignore it.

1
Spaceforce1999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Geezus!!! READ ALL LINKS PEOPLE HAVE POSTED in the comments!!!ARG this is treason!!!!!

1
Lyinlikebiden1 1 point ago +1 / -0

War. We are too far apart to ever meet in the middle. They need to be deported to chiiinaa. Left vs right= Fantasy vs reality.

1
WildRiot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hear reality hurts

1
Cianevalies 1 point ago +2 / -1

And where are the military commanders who know China interfered with the Presidential election?

1
QLARP 1 point ago +1 / -0

They could be in on it

1
Lonnie62 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m telling you all the Lefty Uppers are China Robots! China still keeps messing them up and haven’t quite perfected them yet. For some reason they keep coming out with the Ass part on Top!!!😂😂😂

0
Trumpdidit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Looks like the Carbonnaro Effect..

-1
Juzeza -1 points ago +2 / -3

You’re like 5 news cycles behind