1181
Comments (20)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
ravioli_king 6 points ago +8 / -2

Well... the 2 forensic audits on the machines turned up clean. https://www.maricopa.gov/5681/Elections-Equipment-Audit

But it's 4+ months after the crime.

9
no_more_commie_lies 9 points ago +9 / -0

Watch the video, Jovan says he doesnt give a F about the machines. He's been saying this since early Nov, paper ballots only!!. His point is that a full paper ballot forensic audit HAS NEVER BEEN DONE IN THE HISTORY OF US ELECTIONS!!. The reason is politicans don't want them done. He says that he wants all the paper ballots (just like the Judge ruled on), not a sample. His video(s) are brilliant, I recommend you watch them.

6
Semmelweis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Actually doing the full audit of the physical ballots will eliminate many of the variables that people from our side are alleging, therefore becoming the most transparent out of the audits.

"We saw people shoving ballots through multiple times!" Then obviously if you have 50 ballots and 400 votes, that's an issue.

"The USB drives got messed up and lost" Then the ballots will be counted

"Ballots were printed across statelines and illegal ballots were preprinted and used" Kinematic analysis will determine that the proper paper, watermarks, offset printing alignments, and all qr codes/etc that were mandated were used to ensure that the ballot was proper.

"Votes switched" if we do 100%, then it doesn't matter if data was incorrectly posted and then corrected multiple times, 1 ballot=1 vote.

"Foreign interference via Electronic Voting Machine tampering" again, take the machine out of the equation and count the ballot, they cannot adjust.

The only answers this wouldn't resolve:

"Dead people voting", "Nursing homes voted on behalf of their clients" "Illegals voted" We will not be able to prove 100% that the ballot was filled out by the original intended voter because of the massive mail outs. We can only determine that the ballot met all the standards of being a ballot. We would need to rely on voter roll and signature match for these.

My main concern is with all the disregard of the election law and vote integrity, I cannot really trust that the gov still hasn't been covering its tracks over the last 3 months. Don't even think they followed the post election integrity stuff of turning over the ballots to the proper state dept and so on.

2
Make_More 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lot of people are making this harder than it needs to be. We already won on this statement:

We will not be able to prove 100% that the ballot was filled out by the original intended voter because of the massive mail outs.

You have been counting papers with claimed to be signatures. This is not real peoplea votes.