The proof is in the state archives... waiting.
Backstory:
In highschool, some classmates were caught cheating, as they had somehow gained access to the exam ahead of time. Instead of memorizing the answers, they swapped them. They were given an exam, but when turning in their exam, they swapped the original with the fake (which was in the front pocket of their backpack). Carrying out the original and leaving the fake to be graded, they fortified their grade.
Why does this matter?
This matters to voters as to how they got caught: The teacher noticed the staple was a raised staple and not the one original to the multi function printer in the office (which is flat stapled), the ink was the wrong color, it looked brownish, and the paper when held up in the bright light had a grain that made curls, while the one from the office was mostly vertical.
Suspect fake ballets, inserted into the process? They should be handled the same way the teacher did: hold it up to the light, look at the colors, etc. No two brands of paper or ink are the same. It's impossible to print fakes to match the original without using the exact same process and tooling.
Many thousands of fake ballots were sent in to Dominion precincts. But they were "adjudicated" because the machines would not accept them and replaced with newly printed ballots after "corrections" were made. The originals were then shredded when it was learned that there was an interest in checking the paper copies. At least this is the likely scenario in Georgia.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/incriminating_facts_emerge_from_a_georgia_hearing_the_media_buried.html
The statements imply the originals should still be archived... the documents sent for shredding were extra papers not related to the actual votes. Someone needs to get a hold of them to verify this.
https://www.11alive.com/mobile/article/news/politics/elections/cobb-county-says-no-ballots-shredded/85-43fa8312-3926-4f78-9d40-7664aee07c0d