53
Comments (6)
sorted by:
4
ThisIsHowItStarts 4 points ago +4 / -0

I will say, of the three that are available now… The Johnson and Johnson one is not mRna-so it’s supposed to be safer.

4
MajorAppleHead 4 points ago +4 / -0

Indeed. Old school inject dead virus and let the body’s immune system do its thing naturally.

3
SteelMongoose 3 points ago +3 / -0

It doesn't quite work like a non-attenuated vaccine, but at least it stims your own immune system instead of acting like a virus.

4
crazyjackel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Of all the vaccines, J&J looks the safest in terms of technology, but I would only take J&J’s after long term studies conclude. Even if the other ones come back that it is long term good, I do not trust the new mRNA.

I personally think we should take a campaign to promote J&J over Pfizer and Moderna as it uses more traditional tech.

2
Sick_of_the_bs [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's good to know, but I still don't trust J&J or their vaccine.

2
ThisIsHowItStarts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Word. I will never take one. But my mom‘s gonna be traveling to Japan and I’m pretty sure they Will have a vaccine requirement to enter the country.