This was a piece of satire - it was mocking some actual local govt rep that had come up with some proposal or something along these lines, but not nearly as out there as this satire piece exaggerated it.
The problem with this satire is that this is the way the UK is now. You're not allowed to resist home invaders and you must cooperate with them by law. Since they did that, guess what crime went dramatically up. Home invasions. We can't really relate to that because we don't have many home invasions here because there's so many gun owners.
Well damn. I just typed a whole ranting comment about how absolutely ludicrous it is, and now I feel like an idiot. What kind of clown world are we living in where I genuinely cannot tell whether something like this is satire or not? I think this is the kind of rhetoric they will actually push on us in a few years at this rate. There are already a number of leftists who unironically believe this. It's just that those ones don't hold office. But they vote for people who do.
You must be Swedish. That is their exact cucked mentality; "sexual emergencies aren't rape." Imagine redefining rape, based entirely on the rapist's ethnicity, just to push an insane narrative. "Sexual emergency," such mental gymnasts lefturds are.
Well, if that is the logic, then women can have an emotional emergency to chop the dick off would be rapists, to aussage the pent up anguish caused by millennia of women being treated as chattel and sex objects. Sexual emergency my fat fanny! Emergencies are life threatening, and men don't die from blue balls!
Except when it comes to Julian Assange of Wikileaks fame. When the United States first started to try to extradite him they got Sweden to pursue bogus rape charges against him.
Fer cryin' in a bucket, don't give them any more idiotic ideas. Next pedophilia will be redefined as getting to understand children better. Oh shit....now I just did it.
I’m a lady pede and I had the same thought. People don’t just break into homes to rob them, sometimes they are psychopaths that want to rape and murder you. If anyone breaks into my house they will be leaving in a body bag, I’m not risking getting killed because they might “just want me to cooperate”. These people are fucking idiots!
They are not idiots at all. This is calculated evil. This person hates you and wants to see you suffer. They enjoy the thought of you being afraid for your life as a home invader does what he wants with you and your things.
You know this was policy in every communist takeover right? Eventually the mass rape stops because military officers wont fight if their wives are being assaulted at home.
home owners only want one thing, to keep their shit and protect their family. that's the only reason they're carrying a weapon, as an incentive for thieves to cooperate and not steal shit and rape the family. when the thief tries to steal is when thieves get hurt. if only one family is in the house with guns, fewer thieves will get killed
That is NOT what the second amendment is designed for. The Second Amendment isn't designed to protect you from other private citizens. It's there to protect you from the GOVERNMENT AND TYRANNY. The second amendment just so happens to be effective against private citizens.
When government sicks private citizens on you as a form of asymmetrical warfare, and the security of a free state is at risk, it's back on the table. Enemies foreign and domestic. Just because they're a citizen (i bet a lot of them aren't) doesn't mean they're not the enemy, and just because it's a break in, doesn't mean it's not war.
She's just trying to achieve efficiency in taxation by eliminating the middleman.
Edit: looked into it, the bill is real was filed late 2020, it does weaken (but not totally eliminate) castle-doctrine, but the quotes are fake and originally sourced from some satire.
It’s not. This is a satirical take done by someone else which is incorrectly attributed to her.
What she wants is still bad enough and essentially amounts to someone being able to break in to your house and steal your shit without the ability to stop them unless your life is at risk.
Even putting this law aside, you're always better off double tapping home invading vermin. For one thing, they might actually still be a threat. Even a bleeding out criminal can pop a lucky shot off from the floor. But, once the police arrive you want your story to be the only story.
Good news everyone. While Meza does want to repeal the castle doctrine (which is retarded enough), those quotes aren't real, someone made them up to satirize how ridiculous revoking the castle doctrine is and how insane the left has gotten.
You shouldn't have to. But even if there is no castle doctrine you still have a right to defend yourself against an armed intruder with lethal force if a reasonable person would believe his life is in danger. And dead men cannot testify against you. But the cops can, don't talk to the cops, let your lawyer talk to the cops.
What if the intruder isn't armed but has broken into your home? What if you don't know if they have a weapon? You gonna ask them if they have one? Or are you going to neutralize the threat?
I'm not going to wait and threat asses for 10 minutes before I determine to open fire. I'm going to determine if that person is authorized to be there or not and if not, I'm going to neutralize them.
I'm not going to play 20 questions with a burglar.
The intruder was obviously there to kill my wife and rape my dog. I had to shoot him to prevent animal abuse! Also to keep my wife alive. How else would I ever get sammiches?
There are a lot of people of Mexican descent who trace their ancestry back to the Texas Revolution against Mexico. Not saying she is one of them, but just looking at someone's last name doesn't tell you shit about them.
Meza explained in a Twitter thread that the bill has been misrepresented and its purpose is to amend the existing law to require a homeowner to exhaust the option to safely retreat before using deadly force in defense of themselves or their home (here).
She added: “I filed this bill because the castle doctrine as it currently exists emboldens people to take justice into their own hands. While theft is obviously wrong, we have laws to address that. I don’t believe that stealing someone’s lawn ornament should be an offense punishable by death.”
Yes, stealing a lawn ornament or anything from someone’s property is a death worthy event. By bullet to the skull!
I don't understand the line of reasoning that you shouldn't value your own property over someone else's life.
Why shouldn't we? I like my property, but I couldn't give a rat's ass whether some lowlife scum who isn't part of my social circle and has no value to society lives or dies.
I mean, clearly the would-be thief values your property more than his own life if he's risking it to steal from you.
Equality of outcome is AIDS. The reasoning in this argument is marxist, for sure, but more to the point: hysterical. Yes, a hysterical woman, call me a bigot. This is the persecution of the kulaks, by inserted operatives.
Somewhere in TX IIRC, but words of pure evil. Maybe she should have a transfer of dating relationship and cooperate with the guy who just wants to get his affection and get away
Fine just shoot them and make sure they are dead so the can't sue you. Fuck it don't even call the police, just chuck the body in a dumpster in the ghetto an tell no one.
This is the VICTIM BLAMING bill. It is an attack on society.
It is also the horror that we have already had in Canada for decades.
The criminals literally have more rights that normal citizens. You aren't allowed to fight back with anything but 'proportional force'. Meaning... that you literally have to be dead already before you are allow to use force that might kill the criminal to stop them from killing you. It is insane clown world shit and it has been this way for a long time.
Fact checkers are pointing out that those are satirical quotes (and they are), but I went and used my white privilege/ supremacy skills, and looked at the amendment (she's not trying to repeal it, just amend it to extend protections to robbers, literally.) Found line 18 on page 1, and found the satire to be pretty damned accurate. https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/87R/billtext/pdf/HB00196I.pdf#navpanes=0
Residents are allowed to protect their Life, Liberty, and PROPERTY. Things in their home, including their home itself, is their PROPERTY.
The use of deadly force is authorized if an assailant is in your home without permission. Castle Doctrine Laws apply inside the home and the home owner may use deadly force to protect their LIFE, LIBERTY, AND PROPERTY.
It's pretty clear. And thieves don't carry weapons for protection. They carry them in the event they need to intimidate someone into compliance, or they need to kill them out of fear of identification.
I don't want a peaceful transfer. That's why I'm willing to shoot home invaders looking to steal my property. Gee, if only there was a document which protect my life, liberty, and... garsh m, what's that other thing?
Cause it is Clown World lately and nothing seems to crazy. We absolutely should point this crap out as soon as possible so it is dead before it can grow. That's called nipping it in the bud.
This is so twisted it boggles my mind! It is Marxism at its core. We either have property rights or we don't, but until we don't, breaking into someone's house is a death penalty offense.
WHAT THE FUCK!?!? This cunt is literally trying to decriminalize armed robbery while criminalizing defending yourself from armed robbery. What the fuck is this madness and how the fuck are they not being laughed out of the room the moment the thought so much as enters their fucking head? This is utter fucking insanity.
Wait until it's her or one of her friends or relatives that become the victims of a home invasion..just some joggers raping you for equality...this is some stupid shit..
"The criminals just want to defend themselves from home owners"
A human being with allegedly a functional brain uttered that sentence. Let it sink into you that immediately after that she says "and to coerce the homeowner into cooperating" thus admitting the weapon is being used for a purpose not involving self defence.
So even if we acknowledge the criminal even has a right to self defence instead of instantly forfeiting their right to exist through their actions even then the homeowners right to self defence kicks in when the criminal brandishes the weapon at the home owner thus validating castle doctrine.
For what it is worth, according to Reuters the quotes attributed to the commie is satire. Though, the wording used to debunk it is chosen carefully. She could have said it, but I can not find the original source.
This was a piece of satire - it was mocking some actual local govt rep that had come up with some proposal or something along these lines, but not nearly as out there as this satire piece exaggerated it.
I honestly cannot tell any more.
Yup, satire is dead because the left is completely through the looking glass.
You misspelled "Up their own ass."
me either.
You got a link. I need to see it
Here you go: https://www.breitbart.com/border/2020/12/10/state-rep-files-bill-to-gut-texas-castle-doctrine-law/
Reference to this paragraph being a parody is down at the bottom. Her bill was stupid and bad - just not quite THIS stupid and bad.
The problem with this satire is that this is the way the UK is now. You're not allowed to resist home invaders and you must cooperate with them by law. Since they did that, guess what crime went dramatically up. Home invasions. We can't really relate to that because we don't have many home invasions here because there's so many gun owners.
Chicago is the same way. A duty to retreat invites more violence not less. Being this stupid is baffling.
Well damn. I just typed a whole ranting comment about how absolutely ludicrous it is, and now I feel like an idiot. What kind of clown world are we living in where I genuinely cannot tell whether something like this is satire or not? I think this is the kind of rhetoric they will actually push on us in a few years at this rate. There are already a number of leftists who unironically believe this. It's just that those ones don't hold office. But they vote for people who do.
Don't feel bad man - it's not satire in some places (e.g. UK) as other comments have noted.
Whats her address we can redistribute her wealth?
Capitol Address:
Room E1.21 P.O. Box 2910 Austin, TX 78768
(512) 463-0641
(512) 463-0044 Fax
District Address: 613 N. O'Connor Rd. Suite # 30 Irving, Texas 75061
Kek, this is genius
What happens when the "loot" they want is her pussy? She going to cooperate then?
Once again, another Democrat doesn't think about the words spilling out of their ass!
Look, we just need to be less bigoted and more equitable with our genitals. You need to be more open minded.
I was just thinking that haha Im sure she has armed guards - paid by the state
Then they better Cooperate...
So this is how we remove Biden from the WH, they are obligated to flee.
Just let the man rape you and all will be well. Besides, who are you to deny that man's sexual urges. He probably needed the sex more than you did.
You must be Swedish. That is their exact cucked mentality; "sexual emergencies aren't rape." Imagine redefining rape, based entirely on the rapist's ethnicity, just to push an insane narrative. "Sexual emergency," such mental gymnasts lefturds are.
I have a sexual emergency every night ‘bout 10.
Well, if that is the logic, then women can have an emotional emergency to chop the dick off would be rapists, to aussage the pent up anguish caused by millennia of women being treated as chattel and sex objects. Sexual emergency my fat fanny! Emergencies are life threatening, and men don't die from blue balls!
Except when it comes to Julian Assange of Wikileaks fame. When the United States first started to try to extradite him they got Sweden to pursue bogus rape charges against him.
He's white, white men should never get sex. Duh.
that excuse only works if your a migrant.
Fer cryin' in a bucket, don't give them any more idiotic ideas. Next pedophilia will be redefined as getting to understand children better. Oh shit....now I just did it.
I’m a lady pede and I had the same thought. People don’t just break into homes to rob them, sometimes they are psychopaths that want to rape and murder you. If anyone breaks into my house they will be leaving in a body bag, I’m not risking getting killed because they might “just want me to cooperate”. These people are fucking idiots!
Maybe their desire to take your life is stronger than your desire to live? EVER THINK OF THAT, MS. SELFISH?!?
I know, I’m being selfish reeeeee🤣
They are not idiots at all. This is calculated evil. This person hates you and wants to see you suffer. They enjoy the thought of you being afraid for your life as a home invader does what he wants with you and your things.
Are you Islamic?
Yes, I know /s
You know this was policy in every communist takeover right? Eventually the mass rape stops because military officers wont fight if their wives are being assaulted at home.
It may lead to a more equitable distribution of his sperm.
Pass this all you want. Fuck around and find out, motherfucker.
3 S's:
Shoot
Shovel
Shut the fuck up
That is all
Shut The Fuck Up Friday
beyond disturbing....it's idiotic
home owners only want one thing, to keep their shit and protect their family. that's the only reason they're carrying a weapon, as an incentive for thieves to cooperate and not steal shit and rape the family. when the thief tries to steal is when thieves get hurt. if only one family is in the house with guns, fewer thieves will get killed
I don't want anyone to break into my home, but if they do, I want them to die for it.
At least want them to limp so they will think twice about going into someone else's house uninvited in the future. Knock or get shot, bitch.
Anyone that breaks into my home risks letting my cat out.
I will kill you for that.
What faggot is downvoting this?
If they don't want to die or get shot, they shouldn't be fucking around in someone's house. They clearly don't have good intentions.
This is wrong.
And you'd be wise to understand that.
That is NOT what the second amendment is designed for. The Second Amendment isn't designed to protect you from other private citizens. It's there to protect you from the GOVERNMENT AND TYRANNY. The second amendment just so happens to be effective against private citizens.
Uh, I’ve read his comment twice, yet fail to see how your point is relevant.
When government sicks private citizens on you as a form of asymmetrical warfare, and the security of a free state is at risk, it's back on the table. Enemies foreign and domestic. Just because they're a citizen (i bet a lot of them aren't) doesn't mean they're not the enemy, and just because it's a break in, doesn't mean it's not war.
second amendment is designed to protect citizens PERIOD
So gun protec?
It's designed for both.
This can't be real...
She's just trying to achieve efficiency in taxation by eliminating the middleman.
Edit: looked into it, the bill is real was filed late 2020, it does weaken (but not totally eliminate) castle-doctrine, but the quotes are fake and originally sourced from some satire.
any pixelated text wall with highlighting and circled words is fake and gay 1352% of the time
I think it’s fake and bi-curious 1352% of the time.
Confirmed is not completely real, you best described it
It’s not. This is a satirical take done by someone else which is incorrectly attributed to her.
What she wants is still bad enough and essentially amounts to someone being able to break in to your house and steal your shit without the ability to stop them unless your life is at risk.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-terry-meza-castle-doctrine-idUSKBN28L1ZB
Fight this with every fiber of your being. Don't become like my cuck ass country where the home invader's well being is considered most important.
Even putting this law aside, you're always better off double tapping home invading vermin. For one thing, they might actually still be a threat. Even a bleeding out criminal can pop a lucky shot off from the floor. But, once the police arrive you want your story to be the only story.
Yep thieves are rarely honest
Good news everyone. While Meza does want to repeal the castle doctrine (which is retarded enough), those quotes aren't real, someone made them up to satirize how ridiculous revoking the castle doctrine is and how insane the left has gotten.
You shouldn't have to. But even if there is no castle doctrine you still have a right to defend yourself against an armed intruder with lethal force if a reasonable person would believe his life is in danger. And dead men cannot testify against you. But the cops can, don't talk to the cops, let your lawyer talk to the cops.
What if the intruder isn't armed but has broken into your home? What if you don't know if they have a weapon? You gonna ask them if they have one? Or are you going to neutralize the threat?
I'm not going to wait and threat asses for 10 minutes before I determine to open fire. I'm going to determine if that person is authorized to be there or not and if not, I'm going to neutralize them.
I'm not going to play 20 questions with a burglar.
The intruder was obviously there to kill my wife and rape my dog. I had to shoot him to prevent animal abuse! Also to keep my wife alive. How else would I ever get sammiches?
Well the jury would be out on that. It would be a risky shot without the castle doctrine.
Clearly you have never lived in a blue shithole. Fear for your life is practically non-existant as a defense in those places.
Thanks.
Reminds me a lot of our immigration policy. Fuck American citizens at every opportunity and give our country to someone who needs it more right?
Look at her last name she us the result of our immigration policy.
Mexico is reclaiming texas. Inflation instead of invasion.
There are a lot of people of Mexican descent who trace their ancestry back to the Texas Revolution against Mexico. Not saying she is one of them, but just looking at someone's last name doesn't tell you shit about them.
This is fake news,, see below article for clarification:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN28L1ZB
This is STILL bullshit! She is warped.
Yes, stealing a lawn ornament or anything from someone’s property is a death worthy event. By bullet to the skull!
Not only should you be allowed to shoot someone stealing a lawn ornament, you should be allowed to do it from two miles away with a .50.
Well if people don't steal they don't need to find out. These crazy people don't realize that the softer on crime the go the harder the criminals get.
She's one of the crime apologists who want people to believe that stealing is an OK thing to do.
Why is that?
She's a woman and a Mexican. Hope no further explanation needed.
I don't understand the line of reasoning that you shouldn't value your own property over someone else's life.
Why shouldn't we? I like my property, but I couldn't give a rat's ass whether some lowlife scum who isn't part of my social circle and has no value to society lives or dies.
I mean, clearly the would-be thief values your property more than his own life if he's risking it to steal from you.
Doesn't say anything about thieves needing money in the Constitution.
Equality of outcome is AIDS. The reasoning in this argument is marxist, for sure, but more to the point: hysterical. Yes, a hysterical woman, call me a bigot. This is the persecution of the kulaks, by inserted operatives.
That's got to be some leftist moron from either Seattle, Portland, or NYC.
Somewhere in TX IIRC, but words of pure evil. Maybe she should have a transfer of dating relationship and cooperate with the guy who just wants to get his affection and get away
That’s fucking insane
Fine just shoot them and make sure they are dead so the can't sue you. Fuck it don't even call the police, just chuck the body in a dumpster in the ghetto an tell no one.
This is the VICTIM BLAMING bill. It is an attack on society.
It is also the horror that we have already had in Canada for decades.
The criminals literally have more rights that normal citizens. You aren't allowed to fight back with anything but 'proportional force'. Meaning... that you literally have to be dead already before you are allow to use force that might kill the criminal to stop them from killing you. It is insane clown world shit and it has been this way for a long time.
STOP THE WOKE SUPREMACIST CRAZYLADY.
That is absolutely disgusting.
Fact checkers are pointing out that those are satirical quotes (and they are), but I went and used my white privilege/ supremacy skills, and looked at the amendment (she's not trying to repeal it, just amend it to extend protections to robbers, literally.) Found line 18 on page 1, and found the satire to be pretty damned accurate. https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/87R/billtext/pdf/HB00196I.pdf#navpanes=0
Residents are allowed to protect their Life, Liberty, and PROPERTY. Things in their home, including their home itself, is their PROPERTY.
The use of deadly force is authorized if an assailant is in your home without permission. Castle Doctrine Laws apply inside the home and the home owner may use deadly force to protect their LIFE, LIBERTY, AND PROPERTY.
It's pretty clear. And thieves don't carry weapons for protection. They carry them in the event they need to intimidate someone into compliance, or they need to kill them out of fear of identification.
It's not hard to understand.
What's her address? I need to do some shopping
I don't want a peaceful transfer. That's why I'm willing to shoot home invaders looking to steal my property. Gee, if only there was a document which protect my life, liberty, and... garsh m, what's that other thing?
This has to be parody
So we should give our daughters birth control pills just in case the intruder decides to rape them ---
If they are 12 gauge double 00 Black Aces they do --- Delivered by my Remington 870
https://www.house.texas.gov/photos/members/3455.jpg
She looks like a cross between Terry Meza and Jabba the Hutt.
Oof! I All the crazy f*cks are just straight ugly.
Please add a shitpost alert next time. Thanks.
Just because she is proposing it does not mean it will become law in Texas. Get a grip.
This is retarded. So we shouldn't discuss any proposed bills? Only the ones that get passed? Good strategy faggot.
Cause it is Clown World lately and nothing seems to crazy. We absolutely should point this crap out as soon as possible so it is dead before it can grow. That's called nipping it in the bud.
I'd like a reference. The top starts off with typical garbage, but the last two sentences seem to be faked.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-terry-meza-castle-doctrine-idUSKBN28L1ZB
This is a person who has not either never been robbed or not robbed enough.
Someone stealing my shit and I don't know who they are = gunshots on my end
How do I know they are just stealing? What if they are here to do more than steal from me?
Answer is shoot now and ask questions later.
source?
Please tell me this isn’t real.
Let's say- it's partly true and partly satire.
Just protect your family as normal and dig a hole. No ones going to be looking for the idiot anyway!
Burn barrel for trash.
This is so twisted it boggles my mind! It is Marxism at its core. We either have property rights or we don't, but until we don't, breaking into someone's house is a death penalty offense.
Wit!?
WHAT THE FUCK!?!? This cunt is literally trying to decriminalize armed robbery while criminalizing defending yourself from armed robbery. What the fuck is this madness and how the fuck are they not being laughed out of the room the moment the thought so much as enters their fucking head? This is utter fucking insanity.
Let me see if I'm reading this right: an intruder can't sue for damages when he's dead, right?
Family of evil.
No, but the state will be happy to send you to prison for killing Dindu.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Meza
Who the fuck said this
"Leads to a more equitable distribution of wealth"
SO ITS COMMUNISM, THEN
Wait until it's her or one of her friends or relatives that become the victims of a home invasion..just some joggers raping you for equality...this is some stupid shit..
If someone breaks into your home with a weapon they've 1000% forfeited their right to life. I'd rather be judged than carried by 6 every time.
THis has got to be a joke, or satire.
It sure does seem like Texas is under attack, doesn't it? The deep state must be very, very scared of the patriots who reside in that great state.
Thia has to be a joke?!?!?!?
"The criminals just want to defend themselves from home owners"
A human being with allegedly a functional brain uttered that sentence. Let it sink into you that immediately after that she says "and to coerce the homeowner into cooperating" thus admitting the weapon is being used for a purpose not involving self defence.
So even if we acknowledge the criminal even has a right to self defence instead of instantly forfeiting their right to exist through their actions even then the homeowners right to self defence kicks in when the criminal brandishes the weapon at the home owner thus validating castle doctrine.
In short fuck this idiot.
That can’t be real... no one is that retarded.
These stupid fucking faggots have done an excellent job getting the normal leftist faggot to confuse equality and equity.
Fake and Gay.
At least credit the satirical source to these made up quotes so pedes don't get the wrong idea.
For what it is worth, according to Reuters the quotes attributed to the commie is satire. Though, the wording used to debunk it is chosen carefully. She could have said it, but I can not find the original source.