home owners only want one thing, to keep their shit and protect their family. that's the only reason they're carrying a weapon, as an incentive for thieves to cooperate and not steal shit and rape the family. when the thief tries to steal is when thieves get hurt. if only one family is in the house with guns, fewer thieves will get killed
That is NOT what the second amendment is designed for. The Second Amendment isn't designed to protect you from other private citizens. It's there to protect you from the GOVERNMENT AND TYRANNY. The second amendment just so happens to be effective against private citizens.
When government sicks private citizens on you as a form of asymmetrical warfare, and the security of a free state is at risk, it's back on the table. Enemies foreign and domestic. Just because they're a citizen (i bet a lot of them aren't) doesn't mean they're not the enemy, and just because it's a break in, doesn't mean it's not war.
home owners only want one thing, to keep their shit and protect their family. that's the only reason they're carrying a weapon, as an incentive for thieves to cooperate and not steal shit and rape the family. when the thief tries to steal is when thieves get hurt. if only one family is in the house with guns, fewer thieves will get killed
I don't want anyone to break into my home, but if they do, I want them to die for it.
At least want them to limp so they will think twice about going into someone else's house uninvited in the future. Knock or get shot, bitch.
Anyone that breaks into my home risks letting my cat out.
I will kill you for that.
What faggot is downvoting this?
If they don't want to die or get shot, they shouldn't be fucking around in someone's house. They clearly don't have good intentions.
This is wrong.
And you'd be wise to understand that.
That is NOT what the second amendment is designed for. The Second Amendment isn't designed to protect you from other private citizens. It's there to protect you from the GOVERNMENT AND TYRANNY. The second amendment just so happens to be effective against private citizens.
Uh, I’ve read his comment twice, yet fail to see how your point is relevant.
When government sicks private citizens on you as a form of asymmetrical warfare, and the security of a free state is at risk, it's back on the table. Enemies foreign and domestic. Just because they're a citizen (i bet a lot of them aren't) doesn't mean they're not the enemy, and just because it's a break in, doesn't mean it's not war.
second amendment is designed to protect citizens PERIOD
So gun protec?
It's designed for both.