2534
I once worked with a lefty who couldn't believe that I felt shooting people for breaking in your house and stealing your stuff was acceptable.
posted ago by Womp_womp ago by Womp_womp +2535 / -1

He then asked if I was willing to shoot someone over my xbox.

I told him, "The xbox was besides the point. We are talking about a person intruding into my house at night with my family present. Hell yes, I'd shoot him. It's the principle of the thing. I'd shoot a hole in my xbox without blinking to do it."

330 comments
330 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (330)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 6 ▼
– TD_Covfefe_Crusader 6 points ago +6 / -0

Dead faggots can't press charges or sue.

Their families can though, and they do.

Further, from a tactical perspective, you NEVER stop firing until you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the threat is fully eliminated.

Yes, ending the threat is the goal.

Pretty much every self defense course teaches that you dump your entire mag into the target. You don't stop until you're out. If you're not out and they're on the ground you fucking shoot them while they're on the ground. You then reload, walk closer, and put a couple rounds through their head.

No self defense course I know of teaches anything like this. The law enforcement academy I graduated from didn't teach anything like this. You shoot to end the threat, period. If you go ham reloading and pumping dozens of rounds into a guy laying on the ground the DA is going to have a field day. I'd love to know the self defense source you are getting this advice from.

permalink save report block reply