Mods are quicker than John Wayne on drawing their Mod Powers and Stickying 3 different post (all about the same thing) by 3 different people, with the same source.
We need a better system of cutting down duplicate posts.
That is one factor that is holding this site back from changing the world. Whether the mods are not paying attention, or whether there exists among them compromised individuals, this site has been used very successfully as a conduit for pushing fake news designed specifically to distract, mislead, and, most importantly, to divide us.
Yes. That is one that is abused to hell and back here by the elite and the alphabet agency traitors. It should be a cold hard rule on this site that images posted in order to propagate information need to have a link to the source and a clearly visible date on the news item.
They way some people here tend to freak out and run with propaganda, I'm honestly surprised the FBI/CIA/Traitors Inc. haven't simply reposted 9/11 pictures and headlines just to see how many would believe it.
Indeed. Perhaps start banning certain domains? Like CNN, MSNBC, etc. Or requiring an Image with Links. And possibly requiring your account to be a few days old in order to post.
Agree. And look at OP's account history. Zero comments, a long series of hit-and-run posts linking to this conservativebrief.com site, and absolutely nothing else. I seriously think OP is a paid shill for conservativebrief. An insider at the website would know what the article content is, and not post a title that claims the opposite of what's in the article.
I don't want to see domains like CNN and MSNBC banned. People can use archive links if they want to, but those are significant media outlets simply due to their audience size, and it's important to know what information they're spreading. And every now and then, even those horrid outlets get something right, and I'm happy to give them traffic when they do. In the end, money has the loudest voice, and if they get more traffic to decent, unbiased material than to their inane Dems-can-do-no-wrong garbage, they'll start shifting their content, and even a minor shift can have a significant impact on what millions of people see and think.
Whistleblowers are only credible if they actually blow the whistle, even anonymously. Read the article. The Sergeant-at-Arms isn't even alleged to have said a peep to anyone about "turning on Pelosi". The article says that anonymous sources say he is covering for her. In other words, the opposite of what the post title says. OP appears to be a shill who's paid to get clicks to the conservativebrief.com site, but doesn't even bother to read the content before inventing a clickbait post title and posting it. Look at OP's account history.
Whistleblowers are only credible if they are anonymous
There was a time --- called the 1970s --- when a news network might receive a phone call or fax from an underground organization claiming responsibility for a bombing or assassination or something after it happened. They'd just file it and consider it un-newsworthy, because anyone could do shit like that.
They keep talking about SOTU. Either they're going to false-flag it or they're going to "uncover a plot" and do the full thing fully virtualized so joe biden has as many takes as his alzheimer's needs.
The article doesn’t really say what the article headline says. Poorly written.
The “storming” of the Capitol was no different from the attack on the WH in May/June, except for the effectiveness of the law enforcement involved and that the attack on the WH was more violent.
The article actually says the opposite of what the post title says. And the original headline of the linked article is unrelated to the claim made in the post title. The article cites anonymous sources as saying he is continuing to cover for her.
According to General McInerny SpecOps got a hold of it. Don't know how true it is but there was a video where it came straight from the man's mouth floating around
They're blaming a girl from PA. White supremacists, ties to russia, bullshit bullshit bullshit. But I haven't seen any claims they recovered it so take it all with a grain of salt.
Any report that uses the term "capitol riot" in describing the events on Jan. 6th I consider suspect. They are part of the problem in perpetuating the narrative. I don't care if they have "Conservative" in their name or not.
"A report from The Daily Caller cites multiple anonymous sources that say the former House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving is “covering for her,” referring to Pelosi."
Where exactly does it say to the Sergeant at Arms turned on her? because all I see is where it says that anonymous sources claim that he's covering for her, but not that he has turned on her.... Unless I missed something.....
Thank you. I just messaged the mods asking them to delete this post. It was stickied long enough to get tons of upvotes from people who don't bother reading before upvoting, and if it's not deleted it will stay on the front page for hours, with lots more people reading the post title and thinking it's true. Many of them will then spread the false claim, giving ammo to people who try to paint Trump supporters as a bunch of idiots who will believe any tale that makes Trump look good.
No, read the article, which says the opposite of what this clickbait post title claims. The Sergeant-at-Arms has no need for extra security if the article content is accurate. Article reports that anonymous sources told the Daily Caller that he is covering for her, not that he has "turned on her". Check OP's account history. Looks like a paid shill for this one website.
you know, this entire thing would have blown over if all they said was "citizens have the right to voice their opinion, they voiced it Jan 6th and we thank them and will work on improving so they don't have the urge to voice their opinion again.
Title is false. Nowhere does it appear to state that Irving has admitted to covering for Pelosi. The article just makes the case that he's covering for Pelosi.
And how many time do I have to say -- Jan 6 was a fucked up FBI false flag op or plan by The Dems to simply let mayhem happen. (I'm leaning FBI because they seemed hell bent on finding Trump supporters who were there while letting their informants and collaborated out of jail immediately whiteout bail.) Nonetheless, the Dems were READY to use it to stop the Electors, to have Biden deliver a prepared speech, to even two talking heads on Newsmax who started saying "guess they'll have to put in Biden now," as if THEY knew who was responsible for the mayhem -- the reason I no longer watch NewsMax.
IT WAS ALL STAGED -- how many more sources are needed to KNOW this?
These type of articles piss me off because it is only citing anonymous sources. No better than the people we complain about.
There's no doubt that Pelosi is a pile of s*** and she probably stood down any possibility of having ample security. Unfortunately when the only sources are completely anonymous the story cited here lacks credibility
No worries - this compilation of "news stories" tells us good ol' Lindsey Graham-cracker is going to "investigate" Pelosi for instigating the Capitol incident.
Except that the article says nothing of the sort. It just cites anonymous sources as saying he is continuing to cover for her. Pretty much the opposite of the claim in the post title.
Here we are once again, reading act's of criminal intent, conducted by elected leaders, of the DNC oparty, and not one investigation into the acts in a criminal probe. Time after time, we see these people in real time optics, commit crimes that others would be hooked, booked and bailed, in a same type environment, yet these people once again go unscathed.
This claim of conspiracy is disputed
Whistleblowers are only credible if they are anonymous
Hijacking top comment to ask y'all fucking retards to read the article.
Fake headline. A hyped mod just spammed the sticky button and here we are.
I assume it only has to be clicked once and not spammed.... but yea, I do agree that a mod should read an article before they sticky it.
Mods are quicker than John Wayne on drawing their Mod Powers and Stickying 3 different post (all about the same thing) by 3 different people, with the same source.
We need a better system of cutting down duplicate posts.
And also a better system of quickly deleting click-bait posts with titles that spread absolutely false information.
That is one factor that is holding this site back from changing the world. Whether the mods are not paying attention, or whether there exists among them compromised individuals, this site has been used very successfully as a conduit for pushing fake news designed specifically to distract, mislead, and, most importantly, to divide us.
And regurgitating old news as new.
I think sometimes People post repeat articles to keep the story upfront.
Yes. That is one that is abused to hell and back here by the elite and the alphabet agency traitors. It should be a cold hard rule on this site that images posted in order to propagate information need to have a link to the source and a clearly visible date on the news item. They way some people here tend to freak out and run with propaganda, I'm honestly surprised the FBI/CIA/Traitors Inc. haven't simply reposted 9/11 pictures and headlines just to see how many would believe it.
Indeed. Perhaps start banning certain domains? Like CNN, MSNBC, etc. Or requiring an Image with Links. And possibly requiring your account to be a few days old in order to post.
Agree. And look at OP's account history. Zero comments, a long series of hit-and-run posts linking to this conservativebrief.com site, and absolutely nothing else. I seriously think OP is a paid shill for conservativebrief. An insider at the website would know what the article content is, and not post a title that claims the opposite of what's in the article.
I don't want to see domains like CNN and MSNBC banned. People can use archive links if they want to, but those are significant media outlets simply due to their audience size, and it's important to know what information they're spreading. And every now and then, even those horrid outlets get something right, and I'm happy to give them traffic when they do. In the end, money has the loudest voice, and if they get more traffic to decent, unbiased material than to their inane Dems-can-do-no-wrong garbage, they'll start shifting their content, and even a minor shift can have a significant impact on what millions of people see and think.
Ik. But we shouldn't be giving them unwarranted traffic.
Crop an Image if you must, but otherwise don't (archive works too)
Our mods kick ass — don’t try to stir up drama.
Our mods discouraged any "doomers" that didn't "trust the plan" that in the end, didn't exist.
We're no better than reddit or cnn if we're just fake news ad revenue. Take the gateway pundit. All click bait, little reality.
If this site said there was no plan, but we all knew Trump won, then we could have made a plan.
Sorry, but that’s completely ridiculous! You’ve got every assertion totally backwards.
Explain
It’s basically an op-ed
Whistleblowers aren’t credible anymore they weren’t during the election cases they won’t be for this
Whistleblowers are only credible if they voted for Hillary and hate Trump
NANCY PELOSI IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BREACH OF THE CAPITOL BUILDING
This is the new narrative, lads. MEME IT!
Whistleblowers are only credible if they actually blow the whistle, even anonymously. Read the article. The Sergeant-at-Arms isn't even alleged to have said a peep to anyone about "turning on Pelosi". The article says that anonymous sources say he is covering for her. In other words, the opposite of what the post title says. OP appears to be a shill who's paid to get clicks to the conservativebrief.com site, but doesn't even bother to read the content before inventing a clickbait post title and posting it. Look at OP's account history.
There was a time --- called the 1970s --- when a news network might receive a phone call or fax from an underground organization claiming responsibility for a bombing or assassination or something after it happened. They'd just file it and consider it un-newsworthy, because anyone could do shit like that.
People are much more stupid now.
"This fits the narrative! Stop the presses!"
O-0 things are getting spicy - how long before we get leaks about what really happened?
Mega false flag in 3..2..1..
They keep talking about SOTU. Either they're going to false-flag it or they're going to "uncover a plot" and do the full thing fully virtualized so joe biden has as many takes as his alzheimer's needs.
1/6 was already a mega false flag.
IMPEACH PELOSI
Execute*
For high treason.
*Both
HANG THEM ALL (not hyperbole)
Also not in Minecraft
I guess we only read headlines here and blogs and opinion pieces...
Truth... reading YOURS right now.
I don’t know what that means.
And THAT'S what happens when you only read the headline.
I hear ya. Nothing says the SGT AA turned on the douche.
Fake news.
The article doesn’t really say what the article headline says. Poorly written.
The “storming” of the Capitol was no different from the attack on the WH in May/June, except for the effectiveness of the law enforcement involved and that the attack on the WH was more violent.
The article actually says the opposite of what the post title says. And the original headline of the linked article is unrelated to the claim made in the post title. The article cites anonymous sources as saying he is continuing to cover for her.
Yea its muh anonymous sources familiar with the situation type thing smh
'Fort Pelosi, the Bronx'.
Pelosi probably wants the National Guard to Patrol around her neighborhood too. Especially after that dude shit on her driveway.
If you don't want people to shit on your land maybe don't live in California
Especially San Franfiasco
Witch
Cow
Treasonous Hag
What happened to Pelosi's laptop?
That's what I would like to know.
According to General McInerny SpecOps got a hold of it. Don't know how true it is but there was a video where it came straight from the man's mouth floating around
He did say they. He had also said a lot of other baseless bullshit. Guy is a larper
So is Flynn. Ironic. Not knocking anything he did professionally but the whole Q thing was a giant larp.
Yeah, that was the saddest of all. Especially after the video where he's with family and friends and did the WWG1WGA
No doubt they're the ones who took it!!!
They're blaming a girl from PA. White supremacists, ties to russia, bullshit bullshit bullshit. But I haven't seen any claims they recovered it so take it all with a grain of salt.
Omg an alt-right racist took it??????
Hahaha
Any report that uses the term "capitol riot" in describing the events on Jan. 6th I consider suspect. They are part of the problem in perpetuating the narrative. I don't care if they have "Conservative" in their name or not.
Sounds legit! Don't worry about what actually happened, anonymous sources close to Pelosi's way of thinking will tell you everything you want to hear.
Yep. This is more Q porn.
We must protect whistle-blowers. Wait! No. Not that!
"A report from The Daily Caller cites multiple anonymous sources that say the former House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving is “covering for her,” referring to Pelosi."
Where exactly does it say to the Sergeant at Arms turned on her? because all I see is where it says that anonymous sources claim that he's covering for her, but not that he has turned on her.... Unless I missed something.....
Thank you. I just messaged the mods asking them to delete this post. It was stickied long enough to get tons of upvotes from people who don't bother reading before upvoting, and if it's not deleted it will stay on the front page for hours, with lots more people reading the post title and thinking it's true. Many of them will then spread the false claim, giving ammo to people who try to paint Trump supporters as a bunch of idiots who will believe any tale that makes Trump look good.
I hope this guy has plenty protection/always carries a firearm with him/a trustworthy lawyer! Won't take long before she sends the mob after him
No, read the article, which says the opposite of what this clickbait post title claims. The Sergeant-at-Arms has no need for extra security if the article content is accurate. Article reports that anonymous sources told the Daily Caller that he is covering for her, not that he has "turned on her". Check OP's account history. Looks like a paid shill for this one website.
Neither one of them is very smart.
you know, this entire thing would have blown over if all they said was "citizens have the right to voice their opinion, they voiced it Jan 6th and we thank them and will work on improving so they don't have the urge to voice their opinion again.
Title is false. Nowhere does it appear to state that Irving has admitted to covering for Pelosi. The article just makes the case that he's covering for Pelosi.
arrest her terrorist ass
Shameless sociopath Nancy...
Hopefully the sergeant can arrest her.
She loathes Trump so much it blinds her.
That and the binge-drinking
This is just rehashed from the daily caller article they cite. Conservative brief? C'mon man
Would someone just lock that evil cunt up already
I'd prefer a short drop and a sudden stop for the miserable old hag. I'll settle for a severe case of rapid onset lead poisoning.
We're up voting fucking opinion blogs now? That story LITERALLY doesn't say this.
We don't need to lie like the left does.
Pelosi has long belonged on the gallows
Hope that he’s lived a great life.
muh opticz
Its just a band of ravenous criminals. That's what the government is. A mafia
And how many time do I have to say -- Jan 6 was a fucked up FBI false flag op or plan by The Dems to simply let mayhem happen. (I'm leaning FBI because they seemed hell bent on finding Trump supporters who were there while letting their informants and collaborated out of jail immediately whiteout bail.) Nonetheless, the Dems were READY to use it to stop the Electors, to have Biden deliver a prepared speech, to even two talking heads on Newsmax who started saying "guess they'll have to put in Biden now," as if THEY knew who was responsible for the mayhem -- the reason I no longer watch NewsMax.
IT WAS ALL STAGED -- how many more sources are needed to KNOW this?
These type of articles piss me off because it is only citing anonymous sources. No better than the people we complain about.
There's no doubt that Pelosi is a pile of s*** and she probably stood down any possibility of having ample security. Unfortunately when the only sources are completely anonymous the story cited here lacks credibility
aaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnddddddddddddddd............................................................................................................................................................................he's dead.
Is it safe to turn on Satan's daughter?
Lindsey Graham suggested he would investigate Pelosi’s handling of security of the Capitol building.....
Miss 😂
But yeah that's kind of the point I was making, if he is doing the investigation, it's going to be a cover-up.
Lindsey Graham is a cock gobbling fucktard.
No worries - this compilation of "news stories" tells us good ol' Lindsey Graham-cracker is going to "investigate" Pelosi for instigating the Capitol incident.
Thank Gawd! Now I know we will surely get to the bottom of this, also I look forward to a wonderful speech!
You can bet your ass this is a Democrat insurgency power move
But ... you know what
Off with her head ... let the dnc kill eachother
SHAMELESS NESS
When the Sergeant at Arms is no longer afraid of the Queen Bee, the power structure is crumbling.
Except that the article says nothing of the sort. It just cites anonymous sources as saying he is continuing to cover for her. Pretty much the opposite of the claim in the post title.
Updoot straight away if anyone turns on Pelosi. Havent even had the pleasure of reading it yet! lol
you'll be disappointed then because the title is click bait
the link doesn't say what title purports
Buyers remorse, like a biden voter :D
fortunately, you'll get over it much faster than the biden voters!
I hope he doesn't have an untimely accident
If nothing happened to Anthony Weiner, Then nothing will happen to Paul... Sergeant At Arms!!!
So? It's not like it will ever be investigated nor will anything ever come from it
This whole conspiracy is unraveling before our eyes. It was a setup to turn a protest into an insurrection.
After the Russian hoax spying scandal, I believe anything is possible.
Smells like an impeachable offense
Tldr?
tl;dr is that the article doesn't say what OP is claiming and cites "multiple anonymous sources" for their story.
Drunk bitch.
This may explain why 2 of the capitol police officers got suicided.
Here we are once again, reading act's of criminal intent, conducted by elected leaders, of the DNC oparty, and not one investigation into the acts in a criminal probe. Time after time, we see these people in real time optics, commit crimes that others would be hooked, booked and bailed, in a same type environment, yet these people once again go unscathed.
Nancy's optics - she wanted to make sure the false flag was successful, and made some kind of justification for the malfeasance to follow.