Mods are quicker than John Wayne on drawing their Mod Powers and Stickying 3 different post (all about the same thing) by 3 different people, with the same source.
We need a better system of cutting down duplicate posts.
Whistleblowers are only credible if they actually blow the whistle, even anonymously. Read the article. The Sergeant-at-Arms isn't even alleged to have said a peep to anyone about "turning on Pelosi". The article says that anonymous sources say he is covering for her. In other words, the opposite of what the post title says. OP appears to be a shill who's paid to get clicks to the conservativebrief.com site, but doesn't even bother to read the content before inventing a clickbait post title and posting it. Look at OP's account history.
Whistleblowers are only credible if they are anonymous
There was a time --- called the 1970s --- when a news network might receive a phone call or fax from an underground organization claiming responsibility for a bombing or assassination or something after it happened. They'd just file it and consider it un-newsworthy, because anyone could do shit like that.
This claim of conspiracy is disputed
Whistleblowers are only credible if they are anonymous
Hijacking top comment to ask y'all fucking retards to read the article.
Fake headline. A hyped mod just spammed the sticky button and here we are.
I assume it only has to be clicked once and not spammed.... but yea, I do agree that a mod should read an article before they sticky it.
Mods are quicker than John Wayne on drawing their Mod Powers and Stickying 3 different post (all about the same thing) by 3 different people, with the same source.
We need a better system of cutting down duplicate posts.
And also a better system of quickly deleting click-bait posts with titles that spread absolutely false information.
Our mods kick ass — don’t try to stir up drama.
It’s basically an op-ed
Whistleblowers aren’t credible anymore they weren’t during the election cases they won’t be for this
Whistleblowers are only credible if they voted for Hillary and hate Trump
NANCY PELOSI IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BREACH OF THE CAPITOL BUILDING
This is the new narrative, lads. MEME IT!
Whistleblowers are only credible if they actually blow the whistle, even anonymously. Read the article. The Sergeant-at-Arms isn't even alleged to have said a peep to anyone about "turning on Pelosi". The article says that anonymous sources say he is covering for her. In other words, the opposite of what the post title says. OP appears to be a shill who's paid to get clicks to the conservativebrief.com site, but doesn't even bother to read the content before inventing a clickbait post title and posting it. Look at OP's account history.
There was a time --- called the 1970s --- when a news network might receive a phone call or fax from an underground organization claiming responsibility for a bombing or assassination or something after it happened. They'd just file it and consider it un-newsworthy, because anyone could do shit like that.
People are much more stupid now.
"This fits the narrative! Stop the presses!"