The article doesn’t really say what the article headline says. Poorly written.
The “storming” of the Capitol was no different from the attack on the WH in May/June, except for the effectiveness of the law enforcement involved and that the attack on the WH was more violent.
The article actually says the opposite of what the post title says. And the original headline of the linked article is unrelated to the claim made in the post title. The article cites anonymous sources as saying he is continuing to cover for her.
I guess we only read headlines here and blogs and opinion pieces...
Truth... reading YOURS right now.
I don’t know what that means.
And THAT'S what happens when you only read the headline.
I hear ya. Nothing says the SGT AA turned on the douche.
Fake news.
The article doesn’t really say what the article headline says. Poorly written.
The “storming” of the Capitol was no different from the attack on the WH in May/June, except for the effectiveness of the law enforcement involved and that the attack on the WH was more violent.
The article actually says the opposite of what the post title says. And the original headline of the linked article is unrelated to the claim made in the post title. The article cites anonymous sources as saying he is continuing to cover for her.
Yea its muh anonymous sources familiar with the situation type thing smh