No, read the article, which says the opposite of what this clickbait post title claims. The Sergeant-at-Arms has no need for extra security if the article content is accurate. Article reports that anonymous sources told the Daily Caller that he is covering for her, not that he has "turned on her". Check OP's account history. Looks like a paid shill for this one website.
I hope this guy has plenty protection/always carries a firearm with him/a trustworthy lawyer! Won't take long before she sends the mob after him
No, read the article, which says the opposite of what this clickbait post title claims. The Sergeant-at-Arms has no need for extra security if the article content is accurate. Article reports that anonymous sources told the Daily Caller that he is covering for her, not that he has "turned on her". Check OP's account history. Looks like a paid shill for this one website.