Indeed. Perhaps start banning certain domains? Like CNN, MSNBC, etc. Or requiring an Image with Links. And possibly requiring your account to be a few days old in order to post.
Agree. And look at OP's account history. Zero comments, a long series of hit-and-run posts linking to this conservativebrief.com site, and absolutely nothing else. I seriously think OP is a paid shill for conservativebrief. An insider at the website would know what the article content is, and not post a title that claims the opposite of what's in the article.
I don't want to see domains like CNN and MSNBC banned. People can use archive links if they want to, but those are significant media outlets simply due to their audience size, and it's important to know what information they're spreading. And every now and then, even those horrid outlets get something right, and I'm happy to give them traffic when they do. In the end, money has the loudest voice, and if they get more traffic to decent, unbiased material than to their inane Dems-can-do-no-wrong garbage, they'll start shifting their content, and even a minor shift can have a significant impact on what millions of people see and think.
Indeed. Perhaps start banning certain domains? Like CNN, MSNBC, etc. Or requiring an Image with Links. And possibly requiring your account to be a few days old in order to post.
Agree. And look at OP's account history. Zero comments, a long series of hit-and-run posts linking to this conservativebrief.com site, and absolutely nothing else. I seriously think OP is a paid shill for conservativebrief. An insider at the website would know what the article content is, and not post a title that claims the opposite of what's in the article.
I don't want to see domains like CNN and MSNBC banned. People can use archive links if they want to, but those are significant media outlets simply due to their audience size, and it's important to know what information they're spreading. And every now and then, even those horrid outlets get something right, and I'm happy to give them traffic when they do. In the end, money has the loudest voice, and if they get more traffic to decent, unbiased material than to their inane Dems-can-do-no-wrong garbage, they'll start shifting their content, and even a minor shift can have a significant impact on what millions of people see and think.
Ik. But we shouldn't be giving them unwarranted traffic.
Crop an Image if you must, but otherwise don't (archive works too)