“Mods discouraged” - Mods take a far less ‘editorially’ impactful role here than on other chat platforms, so “discourage” isn’t a practically useful term. Discourage how? By not stickying posts? By deporting users?
“‘Doomers’ that didn’t ‘trust the plan’” - Their was plenty of dooming and plenty of conjecture about strategy and potential Trump moves, and very little censorship except of ‘glowies’ directly calling for violence, some obvious shilling, and some anti-Trump leftie agitprop. People here don’t even have a common agreement about what “plan” is being referred to, and usually use the phrase “trust the plan” to refer to remaining inactive and waiting for ‘someone else to fix it’, which was definitely NOT the overriding feeling of this board.
“No better than Reddit” - hold it right there with the Redshit comparison...
“...fake news ad revenue” - This site doesn’t even have ads, and doesn’t have ‘preferred sources’ either
“If this site said..” - It’s almost like whoever wrote this didn’t even write it with any understanding of how this site operates
“...then we could have made a plan” - What exactly was making it so they COULDN’T? Besides which, people were putting up all kinds of plans and organizing support for things like vehicle parades, rallies, etc.
The whole comment reads like a common board disruption tactic designed to stir up false drama by insinuating some vague and undefined conspiratorial force connected to the platform is responsible for everything bad somehow. It’s a demoralization tactic to keep us from effectively discussing positive ways to address the topic of:
Our mods kick ass — don’t try to stir up drama.
Our mods discouraged any "doomers" that didn't "trust the plan" that in the end, didn't exist.
We're no better than reddit or cnn if we're just fake news ad revenue. Take the gateway pundit. All click bait, little reality.
If this site said there was no plan, but we all knew Trump won, then we could have made a plan.
Sorry, but that’s completely ridiculous! You’ve got every assertion totally backwards.
Explain
“Mods discouraged” - Mods take a far less ‘editorially’ impactful role here than on other chat platforms, so “discourage” isn’t a practically useful term. Discourage how? By not stickying posts? By deporting users?
“‘Doomers’ that didn’t ‘trust the plan’” - Their was plenty of dooming and plenty of conjecture about strategy and potential Trump moves, and very little censorship except of ‘glowies’ directly calling for violence, some obvious shilling, and some anti-Trump leftie agitprop. People here don’t even have a common agreement about what “plan” is being referred to, and usually use the phrase “trust the plan” to refer to remaining inactive and waiting for ‘someone else to fix it’, which was definitely NOT the overriding feeling of this board.
“No better than Reddit” - hold it right there with the Redshit comparison...
“...fake news ad revenue” - This site doesn’t even have ads, and doesn’t have ‘preferred sources’ either
“If this site said..” - It’s almost like whoever wrote this didn’t even write it with any understanding of how this site operates
“...then we could have made a plan” - What exactly was making it so they COULDN’T? Besides which, people were putting up all kinds of plans and organizing support for things like vehicle parades, rallies, etc.
The whole comment reads like a common board disruption tactic designed to stir up false drama by insinuating some vague and undefined conspiratorial force connected to the platform is responsible for everything bad somehow. It’s a demoralization tactic to keep us from effectively discussing positive ways to address the topic of:
A STOLEN ELECTION