3407
Couldn’t be more true (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by ChinaGTFO ago by ChinaGTFO +3410 / -3
Comments (128)
sorted by:
236
NullifyAndSecede 236 points ago +238 / -2

Conservatism is progressivism driving the speed limit.

― Michael Malice

There is nothing left to conserve, if you value the ideals of our country the time has come to be abolitionists.

66
Hanging_Chad 66 points ago +68 / -2

Speed limit in TX is 85 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

68
NullifyAndSecede 68 points ago +69 / -1

The point Malice is making here is that both progressives and conservatives in our government are driving the same direction (towards more government power) the only good thing to say about the conservatives is that they move in that direction slower.

We need to roll back the State. ― Dave Smith

29
NataliesFeet 29 points ago +32 / -3

Dave Smith thinks Trump was a horrible president and encourages you waste your vote on the fart sniffing libertarian. Blames him for yemen saying he's just as culpable as obummer. If all libertarians voted for trump it would have been harder for them to cheat. Dave Smith can't see the forest for the trees.

19
RedPilledRaven 19 points ago +19 / -0

It’s his contrarian nature to distance himself from Trump. He lists 97 out of 100 things he agrees with Trump on but the 3 things he disagrees with Trump means he could never vote for Trump. It’s pretty frustrating but I don’t mind Dave.

17
Chad_Dudebroski 17 points ago +17 / -0

You about summed up the biggest problem with the libertarian party, they can agree with Trump on 97 out of a hundred things, but throw away their vote on the libertarian candidate nobody knows and let the candidate that goes against 95% of their platfotm win because at least they're not voting Republican or Democrat

12
NullifyAndSecede 12 points ago +12 / -0

I'm happy to vote for Republicans that actually aim to repeal shit.

The Republicans never do that, at best they talk a good game (See: Obamacare) and then cuck out once they get in power.

And when someone comes around who might actually be different (like Ron Paul or Trump) they actively try to fuck them over.

3
Symko 3 points ago +3 / -0

When I read the words, 'libertarian,' my brain reads it as, 'moderate democrat.'

Because that is who they are. No standards except. I don't know anything about what I really believe, give me my weed and leave me alone. Feel free to smash the dislike button but it is true.

3
RedPilledRaven 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup, he probably agrees with Trump on more issues than most of the people who voted for Trump. He’s either a purist or contrarian but is throwing away his vote like every other libertarian. He’s a smart dude, he just doesn’t realize by voting libertarian he’s only helping the democrats.

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

He’s a smart dude

He's a fucking standup comic.

2
DaayTerkErJerbs 2 points ago +2 / -0

I totally did something similar. I voted for Gary Johnson before his 'don't call them illegals they don't like that.. call them undocumented' but it was because Romney sided with Democrats on 97 out of 100 things :P

1
Techrev 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dunno, I'm a Libertarian, but I'm not a stupid one. As soon as I get my citizenship, hopefully within the next year if all goes well, I will be voting Republican - unless it's a known RINO. Then, if there's a Libertarian option, I'll look at it. I'm 100% Trump and I really don't understand the issue.

3
80960KA 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's because these soft cocksuckers don't want to get disinvited from the hip cocktail parties.

1
Bigcity157 1 point ago +4 / -3

Fucking ridiculous that Dave Smith is being quoted and discussed, he’s a fucking D list comedian

3
LibertarianXian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who? I can't even search for that name it's so generic

and for the record I learned my lesson after Gary Johnson sold out, and voted for Trump both times - we have to realize we agree more than we disagree and that one political ideology doesn't fit all at all levels of governance.

8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +8 / -0

As a former Libertarian, I agree. Great people, bad practical thinkers, useless party leadership.

The Founding Fathers showed us the way to un-f*ck this situation, and a big part of this is going back to Federalism. The States need to regain their sovereignty from the Federal Gov't.

DeSantis is showing the way.

7
BigAmericanParty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dave Smith is very adamant that "Donald Trump went out like a bitch."

Exact quote.

So take that as you will.

9
BillDBlasiosBlackSon 9 points ago +11 / -2

Language is harsh, but... he's not wrong.

5
Cyberpunkd 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agree. All he did was bitch and moan and tweet, and when it came down to it, he folded like a cheap suit. He even got owned by Twitter and Facebook. Now they've effectively silenced him. What was the fucking plan that I was supposed to trust? I really want to know.

5
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 5 points ago +6 / -1

I'd regrettably agree with the sentiment although not the language used or harshness.

0
geebeext 0 points ago +1 / -1

And the f Trump had done a fascism as so many wanted Dave would have called him the 2nd Hitler and called out the 666 Gorrilion

3
ObviatingTyranny 3 points ago +3 / -0

So... we shouldn't roll back the state?

0
NataliesFeet 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, of course not.

0
geebeext 0 points ago +1 / -1

He's Jewish isn't he

1
NataliesFeet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus? Yes

1
geebeext 1 point ago +2 / -1

Dave Smith, I'm talking about Dave Smith.

Please don't compare a but pumper like Dave to Jesus. Thanks

1
NataliesFeet 1 point ago +2 / -1

LOL! Sorry, got your comment confused with another one. He totally looks like a homo.

1
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except those aren't real conservatives, not even close. RINOs are closer to classical liberals than conservatives.

Libertarianism is progressivism driving 10 below the speed limit and on an alternate path. Credit me with that quote.

6
Thiswillbeintheexam 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can only assume that any grown man that supports libertarianism these days is a complete degenerate.

Libertarianism is:

  • Vulnerable to the absolute worst excesses of progressivism.

  • Wilfully ignorant of the gross inequity between the races of humanity (who are now all bundled together).

  • Wilfully ignorant of the immense power of ANY collective against the individual.

It'd be nice to have a tiny government, but humanity in its current form can't possibly achieve it. It'd immediately sink under crime and corruption.

2
watamellon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Please elaborate on your first two points.

1
somethinga9230k 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have previously argued for no government ( see https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), without any meaningful or sincere alternatives reg. how to defend the nation and country of the USA from external and foreign enemies and threats without a government (nor any meaningful approach to funding a military that way). It is obvious and blatant that you do not believe your own words and quotations at all. Are you seeking to be a controlled opposition pied piper leading people towards wrong identification of the issues and causes as well as possible solutions and approaches to handling, fixing, etc. things, and thereby weakening and neutralizing the opposition? Instead of correctly identifying the issues and causes?

How is no government a solution in any way? And for the much more realistic and meaningful approach of less government, that approach merely decreases and limits some of the negative consequences of government without cleaning up and handling the issues, and is thus not at all sufficient in an of itself (though, depending on the case, less government (but not no government .........) can indeed be very helpful and necessary).

(and the account NullifyAndSecede as per 2nd of March, 2021, 41 days old, has more than 20K post points and 15K comment points... mass-spamming quotations among other things).

3
NullifyAndSecede 3 points ago +4 / -1

I do believe in no government, but I'm also willing to compromise.

I think government is a bigger problem and danger in itself than any of the dangers it purports to solve, and that it is a fundamentally immoral institution.

I'm seeking to lead people towards the correct identification of the causes of our ills and appropriate solutions (the reduction if not elimination of government)

At the Federal level at least I think there is a lot of support here for totally eliminating or disassociating from it.

There is not a single abolitionist who would not grab a feasible method, or a gradual gain, if it came his way. The difference is that the abolitionist always holds high the banner of his ultimate goal, never hides his basic principles, and wishes to get to his goal as fast as humanly possible. Hence, while the abolitionist will accept a gradual step in the right direction if that is all that he can achieve, he always accepts it grudgingly, as merely a first step toward a goal which he always keeps blazingly clear. The abolitionist is a "button pusher" who would blister his thumb pushing a button that would abolish the State immediately, if such a button existed. But the abolitionist also knows that alas, such a button does not exist, and that he will take a bit of the loaf if necessary — while always preferring the whole loaf if he can achieve it.

― Murray N. Rothbard

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

So you continue having no sincerity at all whatsoever, and you do not believe your own claims and arguments at all whatsoever. You lie, evade, downplay, story tell, distract, manipulate, etc. to the extreme, and you know that well. And you here seek among other aspects to avoid having to defend your argument of no government that you do not believe in yourself at all. You really are a controlled opposition pied piper shill. Are you paid to shill?

(and you even come with a quotation that is meant to direct and instill in people on how and what they should think and how they should act instead of encouraging people to seek to figure things out for themselves......................... which fits incredibly well with you seeking to be a controlled opposition pied piper).

Again, since it is still fully relevant (from https://patriots.win/p/12hkTkUVxU/x/c/4Dx6X7guNu9 ):

You have previously argued for no government ( see https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), without any meaningful or sincere alternatives reg. how to defend the nation and country of the USA from external and foreign enemies and threats without a government (nor any meaningful approach to funding a military that way). It is obvious and blatant that you do not believe your own words and quotations at all.

How is no government a solution in any way? And for the much more realistic and meaningful approach of less government, that approach merely decreases and limits some of the negative consequences of government without cleaning up and handling the issues, and is thus not at all sufficient in an of itself (though, depending on the case, less government (but not no government .........) can indeed be very helpful and necessary).

(and the account NullifyAndSecede as per 2nd of March, 2021, 41 days old, has more than 20K post points and 15K comment points... mass-spamming quotations among other things).

EDIT: Forgot to include this part given that it is incredibly, extremely very much relevant still:

And reg. your shilling, you seem to very much seek to lead people towards wrong identification of the issues and causes as well as possible solutions and approaches to handling, fixing, etc. things, and thereby weakening and neutralizing the opposition. Instead of correctly identifying the issues and causes.

EDIT (again):

And you even succeed in distracting from correct identification of the issues and causes by beginning to write about "government vs. the issues it seeks to solve", when many major, fundamental problems and causes as such have nothing to do with "government pros/cons", which you are fully aware of, shill.

3
NullifyAndSecede 3 points ago +3 / -0

You have previously argued for no government ... without any meaningful or sincere alternatives

There is nothing I can say to prove I'm sincere if you don't believe me so I'm not going to bother.

But I am going to point out that if you view government as fundamentally immoral (as I do) then finding an alternative is not something you see as a priority so much as excising that cancer.

To me your perspective is akin to asking who will pick the cotton if we abolish slavery.

The fact that you may presently benefit from the immoral institution of government is not in itself a justification for continuing such an immoral practice.

You have no right to interfere with my life directly or through the institution you refer to as government, and the opposite is also true. I want to leave you alone and I want you to leave me alone.

You're welcome to keep casting aspersions on my motives, but don't be surprised if I don't bother replying.

If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry

― Satoshi Nakamoto

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are definitely beyond any doubt a shill. But are you also a deep state "pro-government" leftist seeking to have a monopoly on any kind of government and thus have an easier time achieving your goals including against the people of the USA?

You have already proven yourself to be fully insincere beyond any doubt, and you know that well, shill. And here you continue to lie, evade, downplay, story tell, distract, manipulate, attack strawmen, misdirect, etc. to the extreme, and you know that well. You haven't at any point attempted to argue meaningfully for your claim of no government, and you aren't seeking to define "government" meaningfully either. And "cotton picking" is not at all a life-or-death-for-the-nation issue, while having an effective defense and protection against foreign and external threats 100% is. And it is incredibly immoral and irresponsible to not set up an effective defense and protection against foreign and external threats, and you know that fully well.

Are you seeking to weaken and destroy the USA from the inside out? Instead of cleaning up the government, removing the wretched and evil parts that can't be repaired, reforming it in different ways, and so on and so forth, you propose that the US government should instead be abolished and not be replaced by anything effective such that China and others would have a much easier time invading the USA (or softer/more indirect invasions such as many more millions of illegal invaders when the wall is not maintained or even torn down).

Why do you seek to change focus away from the forces corrupting government to the absolute extreme and instead encourage people to not take back their government and fix it? Why not focus on the forces corrupting the government of the USA? Why not seek to shine a light on them? The deep state, the leftists, etc.?

Instead you spend your time distracting people and help misidentifying causes and issues. Despite many major, fundamental problems and causes as such having nothing to do with "government pros/cons", which you are fully aware of, shill.

And again, given that it is fully relevant:

(and you even come with a quotation in https://patriots.win/p/12hkTkUVxU/x/c/4Dx6XCDKyDo that is meant to direct and instill in people on how and what they should think and how they should act instead of encouraging people to seek to figure things out for themselves......................... which fits incredibly well with you seeking to be a controlled opposition pied piper).

(and the account NullifyAndSecede as per 2nd of March, 2021, 41 days old, has more than 20K post points and 15K comment points... mass-spamming quotations among other things).

You have previously argued for no government ( see https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), without any meaningful or sincere alternatives reg. how to defend the nation and country of the USA from external and foreign enemies and threats without a government (nor any meaningful approach to funding a military that way). It is obvious and blatant that you do not believe your own words and quotations at all.

2
Vashts1985 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have to say, that is the best user name on this site.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a lot of competition for that honor.

2
CynicalTwit22 2 points ago +2 / -0

Progressivism is aptly traveling at LUDICROUS SPEED...

2
Stallionstyle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Speed limit in South Dakota is 85 ̿̿’̿’\̵͇̿̿=(•̪●)=/̵͇̿̿/’̿̿ ̿ ̿ ̿

4
Hanging_Chad 4 points ago +4 / -0

̿̿’̿’\̵͇̿̿=(•̪●)=/̵͇̿̿/’̿̿ ̿ ̿ ̿

̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿'̿'\̵͇̿̿\з= ( ▀ ͜͞ʖ▀) =ε/̵͇̿̿/’̿’̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿

1
BigLove 1 point ago +1 / -0

There shouldn't even be a speed limit.

6
DonaldTrumpForever 6 points ago +7 / -1

What are we abolitioning? LOL

16
NullifyAndSecede 16 points ago +16 / -0

The Federal Government. Or if that's too much:

  • The IRS
  • The Federal Reserve
  • The ATF
  • The FBI
  • The EPA
  • The DOE
  • The FCC
  • Probably a lot more i forgot.

But really, if you start with the IRS the rest should sort itself out.

6
RedPilledRaven 6 points ago +6 / -0

Flat tax would eliminate a lot of the IRS bureaucrats and erase loopholes that make it possible for monopolies to evade taxes.

4
Donaldino 4 points ago +4 / -0

Definitely the CIA and NSA are big ones you forgot.

4
NullifyAndSecede 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep, it's easier to just say the whole Federal Government. So much alphabet soup.

1
DonaldTrumpForever 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Federal Reserve? How about all of fucking Wall Street first.

4
NullifyAndSecede 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you take out the Federal Reserve, there is much less pressure for the citizens to invest in the market just to maintain the wealth they have earned. The Federal Reserve also drives the market at this point.

If you get rid of IRS/Taxation then alternative currencies can fairly compete with the Dollar in the US economy and this will have the effect of neutralizing the Federal Reserve (and by extension Wall Street)

1
Blaze_Bless 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fed is the source of all misery in the world, period. It all starts with the Fed Reserve, which isn't actually federal AT ALL, it's private, and it owns everything.

3
KiTA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reactionaries, actually. That's the "lets not just stop going further Progressive, lets UNDO SOME OF THE LEFT'S ACHIEVEMENTS" thing.

And boy howdy, the left? When they're talking amongst themselves? They're more terrified and hateful of the idea of a Reactionary movement occurring in the West than "Fascists" or "Nazis." They know they NEED to keep those radical leftist positions locked in for 1-2 generations so the new kids know nothing better.

2
_spacemanspiff 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was the first thing that came to my mind

2
ThePatriot_2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

I call for the abolition of this union, its holdings, and its laws. There is nothing left to save. We live in the decaying corpse of a nation that is propped up and used as a skinsuit by a cabal of degenerate, satan-worshipping pedophiles.

92
NazisWereSocialist 92 points ago +93 / -1

IT’S NOT STUPIDITY IT’S PURPOSEFUL

Republicans don’t want to root out corruption because they are also corrupt.

22
Treeofliberty24565 22 points ago +22 / -0

THANK YOU! The rinos/GOPe want us the think they support us but they are controlled opposition. Traitors.

2
MaoHadOnly1Testicle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrats are the protagonists

Republicans are the antagonists

2
Dreadnot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, they act stupid to give themselves an out. Their real fault is arrogance.

2
Cyberpunkd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. Uniparty is alive and well.

1
siliconia 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're corrupt because we let them.

1
Highspergamy 1 point ago +1 / -0

This little affair called the Civil War punched our thirst for secession or revolution in the nuts.

58
standonthewall 58 points ago +59 / -1

Yes. Now why would sophisticated lawyers take the knee when everything was open for the GOP to win. That's the question.

21
ghost_of_aswartz 21 points ago +21 / -0

Because Child rape and drug / guns / live organ harvesting revenue

8
RabidZoo 8 points ago +8 / -0

They love that commie cock buried in their asses. Sick fucks. A disgrace to our country and society in general. It's amazing how they worship money so much they'll sell out the people of the country they were born in. I believe that things do work in cycles though and that these traitors will get theirs whether it be this life or the next...but preferrably both.

44
zippy2 44 points ago +44 / -0

lol. what's "power bottoms"

42
RememberKosciuszko 42 points ago +42 / -0

Kek, you might be better off not knowing

30
deleted 30 points ago +30 / -0
27
zippy2 27 points ago +27 / -0

shit.

Power Bottom A homosexual who is a bottom that performs and takes control of a sexual situation.

34
deleted 34 points ago +35 / -1
3
BigLove 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's nothing "powerful" about any of them.

8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +8 / -0

I did not need to learn this term.

1
OPsMom 1 point ago +1 / -0

So it's an Alpha who backs that ass up.

12
InTheArmsOfThePepe 12 points ago +12 / -0

Obama has entered the chat

12
CelesteD 12 points ago +12 / -0

Big Mike has entered Obama

3
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yo it's Biiiig Mike

3
MikesDong 3 points ago +3 / -0

☺️

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Braineack 2 points ago +2 / -0

best explaination.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your answer is a simple google image search away, my friend

1
RememberKosciuszko 1 point ago +1 / -0

With a safe search off

big oof

34
Liberty_Prime 34 points ago +34 / -0

The GOP: Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory for decades.

29
Throwingway22 29 points ago +29 / -0

You missed the part where they hand the ball to the other team while shouting "We'll get 'em next time!"

Good comic though.

21
crazyfingers619 21 points ago +21 / -0

Here's the misconception of government: There are 2 sides vying for power seeking to enrich themselves and to steer the country towards their agenda.

This is no longer the function of government. These people are lapdogs for oligarchs who enact policy that gets out of the way of monopoly or helps to restrict open economy so the big players can take over in their game of globalism.

There are no movers and shakers on the right, no one thirsty for that top spot to enrich their side or to spread their conviction.

When they get a majority or win a seat, they don't know what to do with themselves. They are meant to play the pay for play game of dominion, they are meant to vote in tandem with the big pacs and the big interests of tech and hollywood and seek to brush elbows with those who will invite them to the fanciest parties.

Left vs. Right vying for control is a decades old illusion. America is fast becoming an illusion. It's the smarmy clique of enriched elite and everyone else.

10
CelesteD 10 points ago +10 / -0

Do you know how correct this is, and how hard it is to get the vast majority of people to wake up to this fact?

2
Pandas4Trump 2 points ago +5 / -3

The Republican congress of 1920 to 1922 is a good place to start. A filibuster proof majority and the biggest win in congressional Republican party history, but instead the RINOs codified progressive laws by refusing to repeal.

16
deleted 16 points ago +21 / -5
15
Waffleyumboy 15 points ago +18 / -3

It's funny how Libertarians claim to be anti-authoritarian but you don't hear a peep from them when the boot comes down. They're all larpers who only got into politics because they wanted weed.

2
BigHandsome91 2 points ago +5 / -3

Cringe comment. Libertarians don't get into politics if they want weed, they buy it and smoke it. You dont hear a peep out of them because they dont care what the government says.

6
Waffleyumboy 6 points ago +6 / -0

So you're saying I'm right? They only serve themselves?

2
BigHandsome91 2 points ago +2 / -0

You say that like it's a bad thing.

3
Waffleyumboy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well that's my criticism of them. They think being people are not servants of their country. Mutualism means that people contribute to the government, and the government contributes to the people. Not understanding this basic concept and instead opting to just "be left alone" will actually result in the power balance shifting in favor of the government. Of course, real Libertarians understand this and know how to contribute to meaningful political discussion. The lolbertarians that make up the American Libertarian party do not, they are frauds and jokes.

2
somercet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cringe comment. I smoked weed from 18 to mid-20s, but that just made me a scofflaw, not a political freedom fighter.

I realized I was a classical Liberal when I was 14. But I was a lousy, squishy libertarian until the fall of 2006, * when I was deeply radicalized (and it's only gotten worse since then).

Most people have libertarian leanings, but they, and a lot of self-described Libertarians, are a bunch of damned squishes, almost useless in any fight against the Democrats/Pantifa.

I would love to be wrong about that, but I'm not. Tough. Let's keep red-pilling the normies en masse.

* When the sight of Bush 43 driving the GOP into a bridge abutment nauseated me, and I realized the GOP need to be replaced wholesale, or at least gutted and rebuilt.

0
RiverFenix 0 points ago +1 / -1

Every libertarian I know smoked weed long before it was legal.

Its the 'Liberals', New Democrats and 'Green' parties that wanted to legalize weed.. and not for any of the smart reasons like textiles and medicine, but for recreational/sedation purposes.

Libertarians want to smoke weed and sell it if they want to, and they want everyone to fuck off and mind their own business. They certainly don't need permission to smoke it, or legislation decriminalizing it.

1
Cyberpunkd 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know what I classify myself as, but it's no longer a republican, I can say that much. They make me sick.

12
Americanapplepie 12 points ago +12 / -0

“Power Bottoms” 😂 😭

6
slaphappy2 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's kind of like - IRL, you come home and see that burglars have broke in and stole all your stuff.

So you install steel doors, get some guard dogs, get an alarm system, get some firearms, put bars on the windows, etc. etc. etc.

The Republicans just passively watched the democrats steal the 2020 election.

Maybe they were full accomplices to this crime.

But let's say they were merely unprepared victims. It seems that they are like burglary victims who run right out and buy new furniture with zero investment in security.

Was there ANY talk at CPAC about preventing the crime before it happens again ?

5
phandaal 5 points ago +5 / -0

Funny, but in reality they're actually just part of the other team and half of the fans are wondering why they seem like they're trying to lose.

3
LibertarianXian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Speaking of GOP power bottoms, anyone searched for Lyndsay Graham ladybugs lately? Don't!

Seriously brilliant comic - 100 internets and I only have this one updoot

3
YouNeedVPN 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is stupid. You can't play football with only one team.

It's more like a scrimmage. First string (Democrats) are facing off against the second string (Republicans), and the announcers are yabbering on acting like these teams don't use the same locker room at the end of the match.

3
Shillyourself 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's called controlled opposition.

Ya'll need to read Hegel.

3
ravioli_king 3 points ago +3 / -0

Loss is idiocy, but Rush said the GOP playbook was always "let Democrats have the power, and people will beg GOP to come back."

While I see Biden voters have regret for voting Biden, I don't think that means they're jumping on board with GOP. HOWEVER, they may never vote for another Democrat again for failing to come through with BIG promises over the next 2 years.

Democrats will say WE NEED YOU TO VOTE MORE DEMOCRATS, but voters will be indifferent, demoralized, and heart broken... they will not vote Democrat.

1
NotMyGovernor 1 point ago +1 / -0

The GOP / DEMS are insider baseball and it's fucking insufferable. We only have one party and if we want to have a two party system like it's supposed to be TRUMP NEEDS TO MAKE A THIRD PARTY!

3
aboardthegravyboat 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Running the football the whole way is unsportsmanlike and we should just down it halfway as a compromise in good faith with the other team"

"And the forward pass wasn't originally part of the rules, so it would be against our conservative principles to throw the ball forward"

2
Cyberpunkd 2 points ago +2 / -0

The GOP has lost a voter for life. I can't stomach them anymore. They're worse than the dems because they are backstabbing cowards with no balls. Fuck the GOP.

2
megachessatron 2 points ago +2 / -0

GOP needs to learn that the lesson of the tortoise and the hare isn't slow and steady wins the race, it's when you know you can win, run like hell don't stop and take a fucking nap

2
jshelton5 2 points ago +2 / -0

power bottoms lmao

2
EdwardTeller 2 points ago +2 / -0

This just makes me so mad...

2
d_bokk 2 points ago +2 / -0

A gut-wrenching, painfully funny comic.

2
AndrewCuomosEmmy 2 points ago +2 / -0

It would be much more accurate if there were a scoreboard in one panel that read something to the effect of

DEMS: 999

GOP: 1

1
Taupkek 1 point ago +1 / -0

First I laughed. Then I cried.

1
FrankWisner 1 point ago +2 / -1

DIE, Faggots.

1
2016TrumpMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally on point.

1
Tommyjoe2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol @ power bottoms

1
digitalher0 1 point ago +1 / -0

During the last year or so the GOP, with nuts, could've buried Democrats for decades and taken complete power and returned America to it's Constitutional roots but instead they played their role, offered no resistance, and here we are ready to be destroyed.

1
cbonez416 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ouch that is the truth!!

1
FiresideRant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, if it was the GOP, they'd be running to the wrong end zone.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no "winning" in the swamp, there is just The Grift

1
Snoman 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s the point of this toon ? are we celebrating the GOP ?

1
SneezerAugustus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Power bottoms lol 😆

1
LtPatterson 1 point ago +1 / -0

We lost and will forever lose with this attitude.

1
Robotrock19304 1 point ago +2 / -1

Hey fellow pedes, we should not insult the GOP. They ended racism in 1865, therfore it is rude to insult them. Please do not be racist.

1
jsnforce 1 point ago +3 / -2

Identify the opposition, position yourself as the "only" way to counter them, and repeat for 50+ years.

Neither parties are interested in fixing any real problems, else what crisis would be left to "save" us peasants from?

Biggest difference is that the Left adopts insane positions like critical race theory and transgenderism, enacting policies they'll never have to deal with.

2
Cyberpunkd 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's all a big illusion to keep the people divided, and focused on hating each other, while all these corrupt, swamp creatures line their own pockets and do nothing of use to this country. Dems, repubs...they're all part of the same club.

1
MegoThor 1 point ago +1 / -0

GOP threw the ball into the stands then kicked a cheerleader.