3407
Couldn’t be more true (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by ChinaGTFO ago by ChinaGTFO +3410 / -3
Comments (128)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
236
NullifyAndSecede 236 points ago +238 / -2

Conservatism is progressivism driving the speed limit.

― Michael Malice

There is nothing left to conserve, if you value the ideals of our country the time has come to be abolitionists.

66
Hanging_Chad 66 points ago +68 / -2

Speed limit in TX is 85 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

68
NullifyAndSecede 68 points ago +69 / -1

The point Malice is making here is that both progressives and conservatives in our government are driving the same direction (towards more government power) the only good thing to say about the conservatives is that they move in that direction slower.

We need to roll back the State. ― Dave Smith

29
NataliesFeet 29 points ago +32 / -3

Dave Smith thinks Trump was a horrible president and encourages you waste your vote on the fart sniffing libertarian. Blames him for yemen saying he's just as culpable as obummer. If all libertarians voted for trump it would have been harder for them to cheat. Dave Smith can't see the forest for the trees.

19
RedPilledRaven 19 points ago +19 / -0

It’s his contrarian nature to distance himself from Trump. He lists 97 out of 100 things he agrees with Trump on but the 3 things he disagrees with Trump means he could never vote for Trump. It’s pretty frustrating but I don’t mind Dave.

8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +8 / -0

As a former Libertarian, I agree. Great people, bad practical thinkers, useless party leadership.

The Founding Fathers showed us the way to un-f*ck this situation, and a big part of this is going back to Federalism. The States need to regain their sovereignty from the Federal Gov't.

DeSantis is showing the way.

7
BigAmericanParty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Dave Smith is very adamant that "Donald Trump went out like a bitch."

Exact quote.

So take that as you will.

3
ObviatingTyranny 3 points ago +3 / -0

So... we shouldn't roll back the state?

0
geebeext 0 points ago +1 / -1

He's Jewish isn't he

1
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except those aren't real conservatives, not even close. RINOs are closer to classical liberals than conservatives.

Libertarianism is progressivism driving 10 below the speed limit and on an alternate path. Credit me with that quote.

6
Thiswillbeintheexam 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can only assume that any grown man that supports libertarianism these days is a complete degenerate.

Libertarianism is:

  • Vulnerable to the absolute worst excesses of progressivism.

  • Wilfully ignorant of the gross inequity between the races of humanity (who are now all bundled together).

  • Wilfully ignorant of the immense power of ANY collective against the individual.

It'd be nice to have a tiny government, but humanity in its current form can't possibly achieve it. It'd immediately sink under crime and corruption.

1
somethinga9230k 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have previously argued for no government ( see https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), without any meaningful or sincere alternatives reg. how to defend the nation and country of the USA from external and foreign enemies and threats without a government (nor any meaningful approach to funding a military that way). It is obvious and blatant that you do not believe your own words and quotations at all. Are you seeking to be a controlled opposition pied piper leading people towards wrong identification of the issues and causes as well as possible solutions and approaches to handling, fixing, etc. things, and thereby weakening and neutralizing the opposition? Instead of correctly identifying the issues and causes?

How is no government a solution in any way? And for the much more realistic and meaningful approach of less government, that approach merely decreases and limits some of the negative consequences of government without cleaning up and handling the issues, and is thus not at all sufficient in an of itself (though, depending on the case, less government (but not no government .........) can indeed be very helpful and necessary).

(and the account NullifyAndSecede as per 2nd of March, 2021, 41 days old, has more than 20K post points and 15K comment points... mass-spamming quotations among other things).

3
NullifyAndSecede 3 points ago +4 / -1

I do believe in no government, but I'm also willing to compromise.

I think government is a bigger problem and danger in itself than any of the dangers it purports to solve, and that it is a fundamentally immoral institution.

I'm seeking to lead people towards the correct identification of the causes of our ills and appropriate solutions (the reduction if not elimination of government)

At the Federal level at least I think there is a lot of support here for totally eliminating or disassociating from it.

There is not a single abolitionist who would not grab a feasible method, or a gradual gain, if it came his way. The difference is that the abolitionist always holds high the banner of his ultimate goal, never hides his basic principles, and wishes to get to his goal as fast as humanly possible. Hence, while the abolitionist will accept a gradual step in the right direction if that is all that he can achieve, he always accepts it grudgingly, as merely a first step toward a goal which he always keeps blazingly clear. The abolitionist is a "button pusher" who would blister his thumb pushing a button that would abolish the State immediately, if such a button existed. But the abolitionist also knows that alas, such a button does not exist, and that he will take a bit of the loaf if necessary — while always preferring the whole loaf if he can achieve it.

― Murray N. Rothbard

2
Vashts1985 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have to say, that is the best user name on this site.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a lot of competition for that honor.

2
CynicalTwit22 2 points ago +2 / -0

Progressivism is aptly traveling at LUDICROUS SPEED...

2
Stallionstyle 2 points ago +2 / -0

Speed limit in South Dakota is 85 ̿̿’̿’\̵͇̿̿=(•̪●)=/̵͇̿̿/’̿̿ ̿ ̿ ̿

4
Hanging_Chad 4 points ago +4 / -0

̿̿’̿’\̵͇̿̿=(•̪●)=/̵͇̿̿/’̿̿ ̿ ̿ ̿

̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿'̿'\̵͇̿̿\з= ( ▀ ͜͞ʖ▀) =ε/̵͇̿̿/’̿’̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿

1
BigLove 1 point ago +1 / -0

There shouldn't even be a speed limit.

6
DonaldTrumpForever 6 points ago +7 / -1

What are we abolitioning? LOL

16
NullifyAndSecede 16 points ago +16 / -0

The Federal Government. Or if that's too much:

  • The IRS
  • The Federal Reserve
  • The ATF
  • The FBI
  • The EPA
  • The DOE
  • The FCC
  • Probably a lot more i forgot.

But really, if you start with the IRS the rest should sort itself out.

6
RedPilledRaven 6 points ago +6 / -0

Flat tax would eliminate a lot of the IRS bureaucrats and erase loopholes that make it possible for monopolies to evade taxes.

4
Donaldino 4 points ago +4 / -0

Definitely the CIA and NSA are big ones you forgot.

4
NullifyAndSecede 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep, it's easier to just say the whole Federal Government. So much alphabet soup.

1
DonaldTrumpForever 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Federal Reserve? How about all of fucking Wall Street first.

4
NullifyAndSecede 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you take out the Federal Reserve, there is much less pressure for the citizens to invest in the market just to maintain the wealth they have earned. The Federal Reserve also drives the market at this point.

If you get rid of IRS/Taxation then alternative currencies can fairly compete with the Dollar in the US economy and this will have the effect of neutralizing the Federal Reserve (and by extension Wall Street)

1
Blaze_Bless 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fed is the source of all misery in the world, period. It all starts with the Fed Reserve, which isn't actually federal AT ALL, it's private, and it owns everything.

3
KiTA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Reactionaries, actually. That's the "lets not just stop going further Progressive, lets UNDO SOME OF THE LEFT'S ACHIEVEMENTS" thing.

And boy howdy, the left? When they're talking amongst themselves? They're more terrified and hateful of the idea of a Reactionary movement occurring in the West than "Fascists" or "Nazis." They know they NEED to keep those radical leftist positions locked in for 1-2 generations so the new kids know nothing better.

2
_spacemanspiff 2 points ago +2 / -0

This was the first thing that came to my mind

2
ThePatriot_2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

I call for the abolition of this union, its holdings, and its laws. There is nothing left to save. We live in the decaying corpse of a nation that is propped up and used as a skinsuit by a cabal of degenerate, satan-worshipping pedophiles.