529
Comments (50)
sorted by:
16
TheOne1 16 points ago +17 / -1

900,000 white men died so they could be free. PAID IN FULL MOTHERFUCKERS!

4
Somalia_is_gay 4 points ago +5 / -1

White people don't have any value to these people, they want us all dead.

3
Angerisagift 3 points ago +3 / -0

618,000- maybe 700,000. Next week you will found to 6 million. I kid.

3
BoughtByBloomberg2 3 points ago +3 / -0

OY VEY!

-4
StayhumanMe -4 points ago +1 / -5

*rolls eyes.

Nope.

Does not work that way.

Even though the left has cooped and distorted the issue so is this post.

Reparations was to pay freed slaves for their work and give them land and means to work their land (40 acres and a muke) so they could incorporate into society.

Sorry, dead soldiers, both black and white, do not and were nit reperations. Treating them as such reduces those soldiers to a ineffectual monetary value.

Retarded ASS meme. It is illogical and is full of "feels" damn straight out of a lefty play book.

-2
StayhumanMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yall can down vote me all you want but the reparations were suggested while black and white soldiers were fighting for our nation and the deaths of said soldiers was not intended to be part of the reparations calculation.

This meme is an imotional plea for white just as is reparations [now] is an emotional plea for black folks.

Both arguments are wrong, misguided and retarded.

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Field_Orders_No._15)

9
Proud_American 9 points ago +9 / -0

Weren’t white men slaves, too?

Also, shouldn’t the reparations come from the Africans who hunted, enslaved and sold their fellow negroes?

5
NoFucks2Give 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes Irish were slaves but Irish had enough self pride that when enslaved they were not gonna fucking just submit. Africans were found to be docile and easily manipulated. The rest is history.

1
IncorrecttAtLife 1 point ago +1 / -0

this is true

3
E-dantes 3 points ago +3 / -0

This

-2
StayhumanMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

...do yall really not know what reparations are? Is it just a word to you with no historical grounding.

The civil war didn't even have to do with slaves neither too did their deaths.

The freed slaves ABSOLUTELY deserved reparations. Yall are acting like they didn't. They did. This country and slave owners directly profited off their life and labor.

The argument should be situated on the fact that current blacks are not and were not slaves and thus their is no service rendered to repay.

And no. The Africans that sold blacks should not be responsible for reparations as they were a finite services. Here is cargo....cargo paid.

It truly were the slave holding families/companies really that should have paid as they were the ones that profited bigly.

2
NerBolanski 2 points ago +2 / -0

Slaves don’t deserve any reparations.it doesn’t happen in human history;every slave group when freed, usually leaves the country and goes to a new land or back to their ancestral homes.

Abe Lincoln was a fool for not removing them all from America.a lot of the slaving families were part of the people who pushed for the civil rights act and they also pushed for immigration act of 1965 and they have destroyed the country ever since.

-2
StayhumanMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

Wow. Now that's ignorant. First of all Return them to where? There was, a uniqueness in American slavery that was different than pure colonial slavery. Slaves previously were from conquered lands I.e. Greeks fight Minoans, Minoans lost, Minoans captured into slavery and marched to Greece.

That would have been untenable for American slaves...

  1. there was no record keeping of what nation the slaves came from, only the port of departure.

  2. slaves were stripped of their language and traditions so they would have been unable to find their way to their nation anyway if brought back

  3. the cost to make a transatlantic trip to bring freed humans back would have been unsustainable for millions of the former slaves

Also they were no longer Africans of any nation at that point. There was 50 some years between the cessation of importing slaves and the freeing of them.

Especially considering humans were cross bread to garner different bodies (like dogs) any resemblance to an original culture was purposefully eroded as the slave masters did not want them to have a cultural identity.

Like...you are really simple minded if you think that it is apples to apples slavery.

2
NerBolanski 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn't Lincoln or Madison create Liberia for them? America shouldn't have retained a lot of them or even imported a higher population of blacks so that the descendants of slaves will totally assimilate. Lincoln wanted to send them back but the black leaders refused and claimed that they were part of American heritage. Lincoln went against his better senses. I have nothing against blacks but blacks and black issues have been used as a tool by globalists to destroy the West and America ever since the Civil rights.

I don't think it is apples to apples but Every political or social decision has a long-term effect.

-2
StayhumanMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

Yes black leaders were right to fight that considering that in half the country blacks were free.

WTF were they going to do in Liberia? They did not have a country culture or language that was African any longer. They were generations removed from living in any African nation.

And

You obviously have a racial issue if you think that they contribute to the fall of America. Put responsibility where it belongs, the cabal.

The cabal uses everyone. The only difference is that you can externally tell someone is black.

Teachers are used by cabal. Religious institutions too....should all Catholics be deported to Rome? Business men, politicians, news papers...media. Do far more damage than demoralized blacks.

You focus on the wrong points and blame the wrong things.

America is stronger due to the labor of slaves and poor white laborers. And we are stronger from them continuing to contribute to our country since emancipation.... Just like Irish and Italians....

We literally are a nation of immigrants (legal) (...slaves legally immigrated btw).

You are anti American, short sighted and terribly un-nuanced in thought.

2
NerBolanski 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOl.calling me anti-American because I disagree with your viewpoints is characteristic of cuckservatives and con inc. calling me names won't detract me from saying the truth.

When did I put blame on blacks? I just said they are being used by globalists to destroy the west; I never said blacks are deliberately destroying the west. You are the one who has comprehension problems, hombre. You can't deny that America has become a Judaic Afro-centric country. There are a lot of groups and people who contribute to the American downfall but black issues are used to create social tension and cultural issues. I have no issues with slaves and their descendants but their descendants hate whites so I think there can be an arrangement between America and some African nations to take blacks who don't like America.

America is not a nation of Immigrants.Immigrants just benefit from the founding stock of the Nation.No Nation can be a "Nation of Immigrants"; A Nation has a unique heritage, culture, Philospshy, and people." Nation of Immigrants" and "Nation of Ideas" is bullshit concepts that conservatives adopted and this has made them move left on the immigration issue. I bet You love the huge swarths of mass immigration as far as they don't call you "racist".

-2
StayhumanMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

1.Mmmmmm we literally are a nation of immigrants.

The British immigrated to north America The Spanish, French and Dutch immigrated to north America. The black slaves were "legally" forced to migrate to north America.

Prove me wrong.

  1. I called you anti-american because you can't believe that America is (up till the obummer) the greatest nation while simultaneously saying all ex-slaves should have been "sent back to Africa...liberia" as the nation that is great was great because of what DID happen by the contributions of those slave descendants amongst others. For example... You might be a CEO of a my pillow but maybe you used to be a crackhead. Perhaps you wouldn't be a CEO of my pillow w/o having been a crackhead even though, perhaps one should have never done crack. You are basically unappreciative if our history that is why I called you anti american, not because you disagree with me...also what do you disagree with me about? We both agree that the cabal uses blacks.

3.) Your sentence structure implied that America is bad BECAUSE the cabal used blacks which is why I brought up the other factions that the cabal uses. It doesn't matter what pawn they use the problem is the controller.

Also, you add no content to your arguments so I really don't know what content you are disagreeing with. You seem defensive and butt hurt but you aren't actually addressing my points. You say "ship em all back" I gave points what that woukd have been nearly impossible ...crickets from you as to my actual points.

When you have actual points to counter my historical reasoning im all ears.

Till then...

1
Proud_American 1 point ago +2 / -1

State’s rights is certainly behind the civil war, but so too is what the southern states wanted to keep. Slavery was a main driver of the division, without a doubt.

The bigger issue here is reparations lumps all people together based on race and forces the racism wedge between us. A tiny fraction of people had slaves and the number of slaves was also minuscule, relatively. Forcing all of today’s white people to pay for something they had no hand in is a sure fire way to start another war. Don’t point the finger at me and expect me to roll over.

On the flip side, there have been copious amounts of programs started and money used to lift the black man, but to no avail. They have proven to lack the will and capacity as a race to succeed in a merit based society. Sure, there’s plenty of quality individuals, but they are highly outnumbered by the weak minded, highly violent, criminal mentality that is steeped in their culture. Left to their own devices, they will never rise up. More money won’t make a difference and if we start the precedent of classifying charity as reparations, they will never believe their failures are their own.

-2
StayhumanMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

...tslavery....to lift the black man all you have to do is get rid of the democrat party.

They are the crafters of oppression of all poor people and use minorities as there mascots.

2
Proud_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t care how perfectly the road is paved, the black man will never be able to compete (As a whole) in a merit based society.

-2
StayhumanMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

Why?

And.... Only black men? What about black women? Do you mean African American? Jamaican American? What about socio economic background? Is that irrelevant?

2
Proud_American 2 points ago +2 / -0

Man is indicative of human.

And, yes, socio-economic background is irrelevant. It’s not a pretty picture, but when you're 40 IQ points, on average, below your cohorts you will be subject to the bottom rung in a competitive, merit based society. This presents a permanent, long term problem for those who want equity over equal opportunity. If you can’t put forth the same value you can’t take out the same reward.

Also, look at majority black nations where whites have zero influence on the governments and cultures. They are not lifting themselves up despite the lack of having the white man as an excuse for their violent nature and destructive ways. There is still slavery in all those nations and not a white man to blame.

-3
StayhumanMe -3 points ago +1 / -4

Wow. You are ignorant.

So you are a eugenicists and don't even know it. You literally think blacks are biologically inferior to whites.

Blacks, world wide per relation to their nation and socio economic counterparts are not "40 points below". You, once again, are conflating data and prejudice.

Im sorry you don't know this but, guy you have a racist ( in the true sense of believing in racial inferiority/superiority) lens in which you view the world.

Blacks are not biologically different than other humans. Same blois, tissue, and neural capacity. Sameeee species. Same capability.

Also, you completely ignore the impact of the Dutch and British cabal subjegating Africans and causing wars to profit their operations. No humans are naturally violent when given means to meet maslov hierarchy of needs.

You. Are. A. Racist.

Accept it.

5
Son_of_a_Blue_Hen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Enlisted, Union, 9-button, blue-piping infantry, lost his breast-eagle plate, moved his cartridge box around to be seen on camera, otherwise it would be further back. Bayonet scabbard for .58 cal. Springfield rifle. He's seen the elephant.

2
NADSAQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m sure that I understand what you mean from the context, but what does “seen the elephant” derive from?

4
Son_of_a_Blue_Hen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Some say it derives from soldiers who survived fighting against Alexander the Great's elephant troops. Others say it simple means gaining experience the hard way - under fire or through a great ordeal.

5
Muzzah 5 points ago +5 / -0

Paid in full...and then some!

3
CyclopticErotica 3 points ago +3 / -0

They would call that man a privileged racist these days.

2
E-dantes 2 points ago +2 / -0

In the communist eye, blood doesnt put food on the table, or a phone in their hand

2
TrumpsJuicyDong 2 points ago +2 / -0

It will never be enough for the Left.

You know that woman you may have dated who would berate you until you did what she wanted and then immediately criticized you saying whatever it was isn't enough anymore? That's the left.

2
Thedude2283 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought reparations were paid in the form of 40 acres and a mule?

0
StayhumanMe 0 points ago +2 / -2

The blm folks say that they were never dispersed, essentially.

It's kinda like if, 50 years from now our great great great great grand kids asked for covid checks.

2
KX909 2 points ago +2 / -0

They were. No more money. Fuck that shit. What about reparations for all the victims of black crimes? Ain’t enough money in the entire world to cover that shit.

-2
StayhumanMe -2 points ago +1 / -3

Not the same. And far more crime is committed by whites. Btw.

2
KX909 2 points ago +2 / -0

Far more... you mean in numbers, not percentages, my friend. Please. No fake news. I don’t make the reality I’m just aware of what it is.

-3
StayhumanMe -3 points ago +1 / -4

Mmmmmm. Nope I mean numbers. And i mean globally. Sooo im am talking data and not news.

Whites kill more people. They also kill more people at once than blacks.

The actual fake news us that black violence is over reported to make blacks feared by whites (seems to be working in here) and to make blacks more codependent on govt systems.

And further, if you want to talk cabal ( which supposedly we all know thus stuff is stemming) the use whites all the damn time to do mass killings.

But you are right. The news media does like to focus on black crime ( in order to justify political power moves) but as you said. Nothing in the news is real.

1
KX909 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you say is not at all true. Again, you are conflating raw numbers with percentages. Most on here are familiar with 13/50. Apparently you are not. Provide citations to back up your BS claims. Or fuck off.

-1
StayhumanMe -1 points ago +1 / -2

Ah I see your confusion. 13/50 has to do with American percentages. I was literally talking global as you were making a biological causation rather than a socio-economic. Not all blacks are african American. Second my point was on the victim count (as tge recipient s of violence) rather than the percentage of perpatrators of an ethnicity.

Blacks tend to have communal clashes. One corner hood gang is way less violent then...you know...a Kansas city bomber.

Victim count is the impact of violence.

Fuck off? Ok dad.

1
KX909 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're an idiot. Do you know how many died in the OK City Bombing? Less than 200. Mote than 200 black people were murdered by other black people in every medium to major sized city with a high black population just in the last year. What the fuck are you talking about?

2
StartAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

who is this

2
BidensWetNurse 2 points ago +2 / -0

You should all agree to pay repatriations. It's a good deal.

2
TexasSupreme 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m just going to pretend that OP is Ryan Upchurch (CreekSquad).... Wuddup fuggin?!