No matter what they say anything else is racist. Communists hate this because the "content of character" relies on the individual. Communists rely on collectivism.
My point is that communists want people divided into collectivist groups. Don't play the communists game. If a person wants fiscal conservative policies, individual liberties, a government that stays out of my house and wallet, and a government that will protect my right to say whatever I want and protect my family and property to the best of my ability, I want that person on my team. I don't care what "group" they come from.
Even refuting the points of the leftist by citing group statistics is submitting to playing their game. The Communists know their points aren't factually accurate. No person can look around the world and see how marginalized people are being treated and come to the conclusion that the USA is "the most racist nation". But if the communists can force you onto their battlefield, they have won.
It doesn't matter if you are arguing about:
Proletariat vs. Bourgeoisie
White vs Black
Workers vs Bosses
Tenants vs Land Lords
Oppressed vs Oppressor
The insidiousness of the Marxist is to get you to identify as part of the collective, and think in those terms.
So, your answer to the question "Does that mean that the 13/52 statistic is "racist"? Despite describing reality?" is... "yes" ??? Or is your answer "that's collectivist!" ??
Even refuting the points of the leftist by citing group statistics is submitting to playing their game.
Facts are racist and/or "collectivist" ???
And why would observing differences be the same as having fighting between groups?
The insidiousness of the Marxist is to get you to identify as part of the collective, and think in those terms.
Are you one of the kinds of persons that like to preach that other people should not be "collectivist", and then preach to those you consider your own that they should stick together?
So, your answer to the question "Does that mean that the 13/52 statistic is "racist"? Despite describing reality?" is... "yes" ??? Or is your answer "that's collectivist!" ??
My answer is facts are not racist, they are facts.
When someone calls you a racist, they don't really believe that is true because they expect you to then argue why you are not a racist. They set the battlefield. To engage the enemy when they have set the terrain is a losing position.
Content of Character > Color of Skin.
No matter what they say anything else is racist. Communists hate this because the "content of character" relies on the individual. Communists rely on collectivism.
Does that mean that the 13/52 statistic is "racist"? Despite describing reality?
Are there differences between judging an individual, and then seeing or observing differences between different groups?
It is according to the hate groups ACLU and SPLC and ADL, whose sole purpose is to incite unrest and suppress facts in favor of feelings.
My point is that communists want people divided into collectivist groups. Don't play the communists game. If a person wants fiscal conservative policies, individual liberties, a government that stays out of my house and wallet, and a government that will protect my right to say whatever I want and protect my family and property to the best of my ability, I want that person on my team. I don't care what "group" they come from.
Even refuting the points of the leftist by citing group statistics is submitting to playing their game. The Communists know their points aren't factually accurate. No person can look around the world and see how marginalized people are being treated and come to the conclusion that the USA is "the most racist nation". But if the communists can force you onto their battlefield, they have won.
It doesn't matter if you are arguing about:
The insidiousness of the Marxist is to get you to identify as part of the collective, and think in those terms.
I wish I could sticky this at the top of patriots.win in perpetuity.
So, your answer to the question "Does that mean that the 13/52 statistic is "racist"? Despite describing reality?" is... "yes" ??? Or is your answer "that's collectivist!" ??
Facts are racist and/or "collectivist" ???
And why would observing differences be the same as having fighting between groups?
Are you one of the kinds of persons that like to preach that other people should not be "collectivist", and then preach to those you consider your own that they should stick together?
My answer is facts are not racist, they are facts.
When someone calls you a racist, they don't really believe that is true because they expect you to then argue why you are not a racist. They set the battlefield. To engage the enemy when they have set the terrain is a losing position.