So you aren't sincere at all, and you confuse matters on purpose among other tactics and tricks.
And given the rest of your comment, you aren't even describing or treating the original quotation accurately or meaningfully, or answering the questions meaningfully.
I did. That does not make him a Collectivist. It takes a little more than just a tiny quote to judge that. Being individualist and collectivist is a matter of magnitude anyway, and many - if not most people are right in the middle
Except you 100% didn't, and there is no doubt about that, and you ought to know that well (and you might well be fully aware of that).
Yes. Freedom is achieved by taking responsibility for your own life. And in order to be a functional member of society, you'll have to make valuable contributions to it. If you want to maintain said liberties, you'll also have to contribute to that cause in various ways.
And if a "functional member of society" fails that responsibility, and the society then punishes that member for it, does that mean that this society is "collectivist"? What if the society decides on some rules some way, some members disagrees with it, and yet are punished for it for failing to follow those rules? Is it then "collectivist"? Etc. etc. etc. You don't seem to even attempt to think through things at all, just stringing things together and hope something sticks. Unless of course you are directly lying and pretending among other aspects. Your definitions here are not coherent and meaningful, and I am not at all convinced that you believe yourself that they are coherent, consistent and meaningful. And I was asking the original commenter and according to his definitions...
And again, since it is still fully relevant as I asked the original commenter about and which you intentionally confused and distracted reg., I repeat it here (from https://patriots.win/p/12hkTntQjm/x/c/4Dx6XGv8t3G ):
Does that mean that Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas is a "collectivist" (according to the definitions and arguments used by the original commenter which I asked) ? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
"These guys are sitting there watching the destruction of our race while arguing about Ronald Reagan," Thomas said. "Ronald Reagan isn't the problem. Former president Jimmy Carter was not the problem. The lack of black leadership is the problem."
And what if a "white" person (or person of European descent) said the same? Would that person then be "collectivist"?
OK, so you are the same autistic retard with whom I had the pleasure with once already. I am not doing this again. I thought I blocked you... is that another account? (Hint: Don't bother to respond.)
You are driven by the intent to agitate, and your autistic behavior is just annoying. I had this before and I am not willing to waste time on your bullshit again. Why the hell is the blocking function not working...
Yet you know well that I am not at all seeking to agitate, shill, and there is no doubt about that. And you also know well that you have no sincerity. See also https://patriots.win/p/12hkTntQjm/x/c/4DyLdtlnNrs .
So you aren't sincere at all, and you confuse matters on purpose among other tactics and tricks.
Except you 100% didn't, and there is no doubt about that, and you ought to know that well (and you might well be fully aware of that).
And if a "functional member of society" fails that responsibility, and the society then punishes that member for it, does that mean that this society is "collectivist"? What if the society decides on some rules some way, some members disagrees with it, and yet are punished for it for failing to follow those rules? Is it then "collectivist"? Etc. etc. etc. You don't seem to even attempt to think through things at all, just stringing things together and hope something sticks. Unless of course you are directly lying and pretending among other aspects. Your definitions here are not coherent and meaningful, and I am not at all convinced that you believe yourself that they are coherent, consistent and meaningful. And I was asking the original commenter and according to his definitions...
And again, since it is still fully relevant as I asked the original commenter about and which you intentionally confused and distracted reg., I repeat it here (from https://patriots.win/p/12hkTntQjm/x/c/4Dx6XGv8t3G ):
Does that mean that Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas is a "collectivist" (according to the definitions and arguments used by the original commenter which I asked) ? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
And what if a "white" person (or person of European descent) said the same? Would that person then be "collectivist"?
OK, so you are the same autistic retard with whom I had the pleasure with once already. I am not doing this again. I thought I blocked you... is that another account? (Hint: Don't bother to respond.)
So you seem to be triggered by me fully rightly calling you out in the past as well, shill, and you know that well. See also https://patriots.win/p/12hkTntQjm/x/c/4DyLdtlnNrs .
You are driven by the intent to agitate, and your autistic behavior is just annoying. I had this before and I am not willing to waste time on your bullshit again. Why the hell is the blocking function not working...
Yet you know well that I am not at all seeking to agitate, shill, and there is no doubt about that. And you also know well that you have no sincerity. See also https://patriots.win/p/12hkTntQjm/x/c/4DyLdtlnNrs .