1429
posted ago by phibetared ago by phibetared +1430 / -1
  1. The collapsing chinese people due to the Chinese Virus was pure propaganda.

  2. The Capitol Riot was staged - the video clearly shows a group of provocateurs working WITH the (supposed) "capitol police" to fake (?) a girl getting shot. THIS has never been in the news

NASTY forces at work. Why doesn't Trump call this out?

Comments (66)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
4
idkfa 4 points ago +5 / -1

Holy shit.

  1. Nobody ducks, nobody runs away. They just crouch a little.
    Call me crazy, but I'd fuck right off if I heard a gunshot nearby.
  2. The gunman was right there in front of Babbitt for full 15 seconds.
  3. There's almost no blood.
  4. Everyone at the scene is doing fuck all to help an allegedly shot Babbitt.
    They fumble around and yell.
  5. At 6:06 the gun is definitively not pointing at Babbit's chest or neck areas.
0
independentbystander 0 points ago +4 / -4

That poorly-researched video is rife with misinformation.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
4
independentbystander 4 points ago +4 / -0

On Day 3 of debunking it, I wrote:

>Warning: the footage you are about to see is extremely "educational."

>He's right about one thing there, anyway. I had no idea it was possible to fit that much inaccurate bullshit into a 21:25 video. I'm sort of impressed, uninformed know-it-all YouTube clickbaiters rarely have that level of incentive.

>I apologize for my oversight. Had I caught that blurb at the beginning, I would have lit that video-editor up with every bit of the ridicule he deserves, and then some. (My other posts in this thread address the multiple areas of inaccuracy, easily rebutted with medical facts/common knowledge/personally-obtained information from experts.)

>The small number of speculations on my part are made obvious, while making effort to explain my reasoning. The editor of this video makes no such effort, choosing instead to rely fully on unsubstantiated guesses followed by jazz-hands.

So if you want to see me rip on everything that guy didn't bother to research, here is the Official Thread Of That, my posts are obviously the big textwalls of facts/research (to balance the near-complete lack thereof in the video in question.)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
idkfa 0 points ago +2 / -2

Oh, and plastic windows.
FFS. It's not plexiglass, it's just acrylic plastic.
I've never seen plastic windows used anywhere in construction.

Also, why would there be this lone barricade in that specific spot all the while the "protestors" were allowed to roam the Capitol freely?

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many institutional buildings have "Georgian wired glass" with a wire mesh embedded in the glass, which keeps it mostly in one piece when it breaks (as it were.) The Capitol building would certainly have the budget for that sort of thing, and it is very common to see in a facility of that stature (as well as schools or local-government buildings.)

About the barricade, the sign above the door says "Speaker's Lobby." I'm no expert on the Capitol building layout, so I'm curious about what that area is currently used for. (Moar info on that here.) Is that a waiting-room, is it adjacent to Pelosi's office and private email server? So far I haven't found a lot of info on that. It's not a "waiting room" anymore, they took the chairs away. (Also, that link appears to show an earlier picture of the doorway where the Babbitt shooting happened.)

2
idkfa 2 points ago +2 / -0

I appreciate the insight, and I am familiar with laminated glass.
The wiki link has the picture of what that laminated glass looks like when broken - and this is nothing like what is happening to the windows in the video.