1098
Comments (67)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
Fat_Moco 7 points ago +13 / -6

It is sad and tragic. I don't know why people are insisting this was fake. Think about it - the media would have been talking about it for weeks or months if it were false. The fact that they immediately stopped talking about Ashli CONFIRMS that it was real and if anybody pulls that thread, they will find that her murderer did not act alone. He was given an order to shoot. Who gave that order?

Ashli has multiple murderers being hidden and protected by the traitors/ media. That's how you know this really happened.

3
vote_for_MAGA_2020 3 points ago +6 / -3

The only reason I might think it was fake was just the sheer unbelievability of the idea that a cop would shoot a peaceful (albeit rowdy) protester in cold blood.

But then I see how politicians and media overreacted and outright lie about what all happened at the Capitol. I realize politicians never suffer the consequences of their actions, the first time they DO start to see some consequences, they crack down o n us like literal dictators and wall-off and being in the military to protect themselves.

5
Fat_Moco 5 points ago +6 / -1

I wish it weren't true but the State has a long record of leveraging innocent death for some hidden objective.

0
_spacemanspiff 0 points ago +1 / -1

That video on top comment is convincing. It’s weird

2
Fat_Moco 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure the video is convincing. That's because there was a staged insurrection happening. So yes, you can find lots of odd behaviors and coordination going on.

When I first watched that video, I was excited by the intro. I thought it would focus on the truth of who was really carrying out a planned attack.

But then the video turns focus to claiming that Ashli was the star in some kind of attempt fraud to help the state with the False story of Trump supporters attacking the capitol. It makes no sense.

So the clever editing and voice over is just a well produced lie.

When I saw the video, I had already watched several full length videos including the "JaydenX" video and one posted by InfoWars.
These two are the main sources for the FF video.

Keep in mind one trick of presenting something that is false, what is being left out? I have seen nothing to support the ide that InfoWars and JaydenX were in kahoots. We have seen prrof that JaydenX was working with CNN though. But when these two camera guys interact in their videos after the shooting, you can tell they don't know each other.

I think it is much harder to believe that CNN and InfoWars cooperated with each other and the State to convince all of us of something that none of them want to talk about. They would LOVE for us to forget that the State murdered a Trump supporter. Let's never forget that.

2
thedonaldsomething 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's only convincing when you listen to the narrator make assumptions about everything. There's no proof of any of it and most of what he says is assumptions.

1
_spacemanspiff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems like the most convincing part is everyone in the room behaving like a Skyrim NPC the entire time after she was shot.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
0
Fat_Moco 0 points ago +3 / -3

ok - if you're already doing that thing where you barely understand the reasoning of someone else's point so you simply strawman it and move on... well you're not going to get it. I'm talking to people who don't mind thinking critically about it.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
0
Fat_Moco 0 points ago +3 / -3

I just made a new post. I don't think this post is the best place to debate this.

-1
drmrboy -1 points ago +1 / -2

No.