It's okay to make a first attempt of contact which includes facts and logic but the second they start spazzing out and activate NPC mode you just have to call them buzzwords and you win.
I wish I learned this sooner.
In a discussion with retarded commies or any typical NPC the best course of action is to repeat their accusations back at them and maybe sprinkle in some logic too.
E.g.
NPC: "You think muslim rape gangs are bad, you're racist"
Patriot: "Wow you assume all muslims are brown, that's so racist, typical white supremacist"
They freak out and backtrack and sometimes genuinely consider their behaviour. It sucks but it works.
Back when I still had Facebook, I did this to a lefty who called me a "pussy". I asked him if that aligned with his feminist sensibilities and when he said it did not, I told him he should apologize to all the women who had read that statement.
He apologized. I "won" the discussion.
I almost, ALMOST called him a pussy for apologizing. Looking back, I should have.
It's so lame that it works but it does. It's like arguing with a woman. Using logic and reasoning doesn't work, just play with her emotions and change her mood and immediately you win.
I wish we did too. We let the other side define the battlefield, and then we wonder why we're on defense.
It's like when someone calls you a racist. They don't believe that is true, because they are expecting to have you refute the claim. It ends up being like someone accusing you of being drunk. The more you try to deny the claim the worse you sound.
The number one thing I have done to almost guarantee a triggering is to call them conspiracy theorists. They absolutely hate that shit. To quote the commies: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."
A lesschess with pigeonsvariation of this tactic, that still remains tethered to facts and reason, is toaccuse their feelings of being disingenuous:
Muh Drumpth was in Epsteins’ little black book.
I don’t think you ACTUALLY care about girls getting raped, or even kids. If you did, you’d want to investigate other cases related to Epstein for which there’s much better evidence.
So you think it’s okay for Drumpth to be friends with Epstein!
I think YOU’RE fine with Epstein and his whole rape Island. I think you’d send your own kids there to get sniffed by Biden’s crack-smoking family, because you only PRETEND to care about rape victims when the TV tells you to, and you close your eyes and look the other way when it doesn’t
Oh, and I should probably just trust Fox News and Q-anonymous, right?
I don’t think you can trust anyone anymore, even yourself, because you gave up your own REAL feelings so that you don’t have to think too much, because if you started thinking you’d realize that you’ve been taking the word of rapists and abusers as truth for years now, and that would be too painful for your real genuine psyche to handle, so you let them turn you into a phony.
Well you believe everything your god emperor says!
Do I? Or can I tell what the differences are between the two accusations, and which one has objective facts to support it, and which one just has more anonymous accusations stacked up in a line? Do you know the difference? Do you even CARE?
I think this is more going on the attack rather than letting them put us on the defense.
Their accusations are not in good faith. They only do it because it makes us put all our energy on defending ourselves. IE they only do it BECAUSE we're innocent and we'll try to set the record straight every time they do it.
So just ignore their accusations and attack them directly. They're the ones who are wrong, false, and guilty. Treat them like it.
I think we all are coming to this conclusion. Only if we believe they are honest can they abuse us. I no longer believe their BS. So when I visit a Biden voter this weekend, and they say how happy they are, I am just going to ask “do you know who is actually running our government”? When they say Biden I am just going to laugh outloud and say “ you can’t be serious “?
With liberals, its best to not treat them the way you want to be treated because they'll never return the courtesy. Instead, I treat them the same way they treat me... unsurprisingly, they really don't like it.
I've found that always being on offense when debating liberals works the best. Never attempt to defend your position, just repeat it or attack on a new point. All they do is attack, they never defend. When you do the same it works.
this whole site needs to come around to that fact sooner rather than later. we're not dealing with real people, consideration is no longer required.
my concern is this site
not the npcs
and how this site can learn to lead and help other humans
It's okay to make a first attempt of contact which includes facts and logic but the second they start spazzing out and activate NPC mode you just have to call them buzzwords and you win.
I wish I learned this sooner.
In a discussion with retarded commies or any typical NPC the best course of action is to repeat their accusations back at them and maybe sprinkle in some logic too.
E.g.
NPC: "You think muslim rape gangs are bad, you're racist"
Patriot: "Wow you assume all muslims are brown, that's so racist, typical white supremacist"
They freak out and backtrack and sometimes genuinely consider their behaviour. It sucks but it works.
Back when I still had Facebook, I did this to a lefty who called me a "pussy". I asked him if that aligned with his feminist sensibilities and when he said it did not, I told him he should apologize to all the women who had read that statement.
He apologized. I "won" the discussion.
I almost, ALMOST called him a pussy for apologizing. Looking back, I should have.
You definitely should have but what's done is done 🤣
It's so lame that it works but it does. It's like arguing with a woman. Using logic and reasoning doesn't work, just play with her emotions and change her mood and immediately you win.
I wish we did too. We let the other side define the battlefield, and then we wonder why we're on defense.
It's like when someone calls you a racist. They don't believe that is true, because they are expecting to have you refute the claim. It ends up being like someone accusing you of being drunk. The more you try to deny the claim the worse you sound.
News flash, 70million people at least give a shit, you fuckin' left wing moron.
My dad can beat up both your dads!
The number one thing I have done to almost guarantee a triggering is to call them conspiracy theorists. They absolutely hate that shit. To quote the commies: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."
And when you have mankind’s 2nd most potent weapon close at hand, you can ridicule more freely!
Emphasis on 2nd
Awoman!
Winners never quit, quitters never win. You defeatist asshole.
Who?
A less chess with pigeons variation of this tactic, that still remains tethered to facts and reason, is to accuse their feelings of being disingenuous:
Muh Drumpth was in Epsteins’ little black book.
I don’t think you ACTUALLY care about girls getting raped, or even kids. If you did, you’d want to investigate other cases related to Epstein for which there’s much better evidence.
So you think it’s okay for Drumpth to be friends with Epstein!
I think YOU’RE fine with Epstein and his whole rape Island. I think you’d send your own kids there to get sniffed by Biden’s crack-smoking family, because you only PRETEND to care about rape victims when the TV tells you to, and you close your eyes and look the other way when it doesn’t
Oh, and I should probably just trust Fox News and Q-anonymous, right?
I don’t think you can trust anyone anymore, even yourself, because you gave up your own REAL feelings so that you don’t have to think too much, because if you started thinking you’d realize that you’ve been taking the word of rapists and abusers as truth for years now, and that would be too painful for your real genuine psyche to handle, so you let them turn you into a phony.
Well you believe everything your god emperor says!
Do I? Or can I tell what the differences are between the two accusations, and which one has objective facts to support it, and which one just has more anonymous accusations stacked up in a line? Do you know the difference? Do you even CARE?
<stand back and brace for angry npc attack>
That's brilliant, doing this next time :)
when in doubt, "no u"
Exactly. Facts do not work on land whales and soy boy beta cucks. Only mockery and name calling.
so true. make it a game you play with the subhumans at the zoo.
I think this is more going on the attack rather than letting them put us on the defense.
Their accusations are not in good faith. They only do it because it makes us put all our energy on defending ourselves. IE they only do it BECAUSE we're innocent and we'll try to set the record straight every time they do it.
So just ignore their accusations and attack them directly. They're the ones who are wrong, false, and guilty. Treat them like it.
Exactly. They are NEVER discussing in good faith.
I've gone to this point as well. No sense in trying to reason with people using logic, instead I mock them and attack their beliefs with absurdity.
I like telling my double-masked coworkers "Where's your third mask?" as I walk around mask-free.
"YOUR MOM!"
They don't run on logic, they run on feeeeeeelings.
The capital riots were just as bad as 9/11…
Well they were both inside jobs to kill Americans...
I think we all are coming to this conclusion. Only if we believe they are honest can they abuse us. I no longer believe their BS. So when I visit a Biden voter this weekend, and they say how happy they are, I am just going to ask “do you know who is actually running our government”? When they say Biden I am just going to laugh outloud and say “ you can’t be serious “?
precisely. just play with them. make it fun for yourself and you will always win.
I don't understand, you're factualy correct on both sides!
With liberals, its best to not treat them the way you want to be treated because they'll never return the courtesy. Instead, I treat them the same way they treat me... unsurprisingly, they really don't like it.
It's true. No point in even listening to them anymore.
I opt to use the simpler "YOU'RE A POO-POO HEAD" comeback.
I've found that always being on offense when debating liberals works the best. Never attempt to defend your position, just repeat it or attack on a new point. All they do is attack, they never defend. When you do the same it works.
We say facts don't care about your feelings. They demonstrate that their feelings don't care about facts.
Fight stupidity with a lethal injection.
We The Initiated
Hit em with them kindergarten comebacks works every single time <3 MAGA2021