A less chess with pigeons variation of this tactic, that still remains tethered to facts and reason, is to accuse their feelings of being disingenuous:

Muh Drumpth was in Epsteins’ little black book.

I don’t think you ACTUALLY care about girls getting raped, or even kids. If you did, you’d want to investigate other cases related to Epstein for which there’s much better evidence.

So you think it’s okay for Drumpth to be friends with Epstein!

I think YOU’RE fine with Epstein and his whole rape Island. I think you’d send your own kids there to get sniffed by Biden’s crack-smoking family, because you only PRETEND to care about rape victims when the TV tells you to, and you close your eyes and look the other way when it doesn’t

Oh, and I should probably just trust Fox News and Q-anonymous, right?

I don’t think you can trust anyone anymore, even yourself, because you gave up your own REAL feelings so that you don’t have to think too much, because if you started thinking you’d realize that you’ve been taking the word of rapists and abusers as truth for years now, and that would be too painful for your real genuine psyche to handle, so you let them turn you into a phony.

Well you believe everything your god emperor says!

Do I? Or can I tell what the differences are between the two accusations, and which one has objective facts to support it, and which one just has more anonymous accusations stacked up in a line? Do you know the difference? Do you even CARE?

<stand back and brace for angry npc attack>