4736
Comments (461)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
970
ChuckedBeef 970 points ago +970 / -0

Now that they have had sufficient time to doctor the evidence.

461
GenericInsult 461 points ago +461 / -0

^ This. It is just astonishing it took this long.

293
SuddenlyClintoned 293 points ago +293 / -0

I could assemble a team that could doctor everything in 7-10 days... Not 4 months.

239
Nameless_Mofo 239 points ago +239 / -0

That's because the private sector is more efficient out of necessity.

92
SuddenlyClintoned 92 points ago +93 / -1

Truth. I'd be a bit more nasty about hiding my multiple felonies and coup. But then again, they've never been held accountable.

11
canigetawutwut 11 points ago +11 / -0

gov is not ' for profit ' they dont have any incentive to be efficient

80
Pumpitrealgood 80 points ago +80 / -0

neah, fraud was conducted on multiple fronts. including faked addresses, and made up people. It was a monumental task to create the illusion that Biden had the votes, and it would be a monumental task to undo the fraud, and actually create real voters with real addresses. I know you are skeptical, but keep the faith! It will be revealed. Just keep pressing.

33
SuddenlyClintoned 33 points ago +34 / -1

I actually do have faith. The only thing propping up any semblance of legitimacy in anybodies eyes is the media. The common man knows the truth.

The problem is that A) there's no process to remove a sitting president other than impeachment, even if this is proven true. And B) Is it proven in any reasonable time? Evidence being proven in 2027 doesn't help anyone.

22
DonJr2024 22 points ago +22 / -0

You may be right. Hard to say. The ballots at this point are more tainted than Hunter Biden and Lady Gaga's crack pipes.

11
ShyRipley 11 points ago +11 / -0

Keep the faith. That's what I need to hear. :)

It's NEVER too late for the truth to be revealed. And even if we get all these states uncovered and nothing else happens but that, I will be happy to know that forever more, the Biden Regime will be known OFFICIALLY as illegitimate, installed by corrupt means and not voted in by the Will Of The People. A small victory but it will cement the fact that the other side Did. Not. Win.

SUCK MY #!$& MARICOPA COUNTY. I watched the hearings like it was my job. Now show it ALL.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Barrysstash 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hope you’re right

31
kt524 31 points ago +31 / -0

They could do it even quicker, if they weren't complicit on letting them tamper with the evidence.

32
Susurro 32 points ago +33 / -1

🚨Jovan Hutton Pulitzer update on the situation: https://youtu.be/nAZiBpf-xtM

We need to keep the pressure up on these fools. They're all trying to squirm out of this at every stage of the process.

20
BoughtByBloomberg2 20 points ago +20 / -0

They are still government employees. Between the mandated 2 months holiday and clocking out at noon everyday this is all they could manage.

15
Taliesin 15 points ago +15 / -0

Tampering with the evidence is the nearest thing to work these government employees have ever done. With any luck, it is as slipshod and lazy as their usual half hearted attempts at pretending not to be idle.

8
OPsMom 8 points ago +9 / -1

I could assemble a team that could poke holes in your doctoring in 7-10 days.

8
bigrex64 8 points ago +8 / -0

well, it took that long to threaten these ass holes with real jail time.

2
Junionthepipeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lotta evidence to get rid of.

130
PartTimeLoser 130 points ago +130 / -0

Exactly. Nobody fights and fights and fights the courts for months and then one day goes “ok fine have it all lol we were just playing”

38
NotAPuma 38 points ago +38 / -0

Which is why we should punish people for dragging shit through court.

11
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 11 points ago +11 / -0

This isn't a court like us plevs are used to, this is a bureaucratic system set up of bureaucrats, by the bureaucrats, and for the bureaucrats.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
DiscoverAFire 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hope so, and it looks that way, but I've had my hopium dreams crushed too many times to let my guard down.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
in_the_end_08 2 points ago +2 / -0

The walls aren't closing in on them. The walls are opening up. 2018 was a limited trial run in safe states of the process, 2020 was just an extension to see how far they could take it.

2022 and 2024 will set the gold standard for this process.

This needs to be fixed but the repubs were too interested in being liked by the media to stop it.

1
Auroraalpha 1 point ago +1 / -0

HR1....

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
53
deleteDems 53 points ago +53 / -0

Yes, I'm going to guess a large majority of these will be fake ballots to confirm "there was no fraud".

19
Pumpitrealgood 19 points ago +21 / -2

you still need real addresses, to real registered people. You can do a polling of 1000 voters to see how they voted, or what went on, and I bet the error rate will be 25% or more

8
becky21k1 8 points ago +8 / -0

What if the ballots can no longer be connected to an address?

8
SurfingUSA 8 points ago +9 / -1

... in.val.id. ....

5
TDCRedpill 5 points ago +5 / -0

NONE of the ballots should be connected to an address in any way. Blind ballot means no connecting a vote to a voter.

Addresses and voter verification isn't done from the ballots because niether are on the ballot.

1
Deplora 1 point ago +2 / -1

Of course the ballots can't be connected to addresses or people's names. If they could be, a whole lot of election officials would be looking at prison time.

1
in_the_end_08 1 point ago +1 / -0

No standing...

1
Pumpitrealgood 1 point ago +1 / -0

in that case they are invalidated, and tossed out.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
26
MAGAlikeLINCOLN 26 points ago +26 / -0

Anyone really know if they can be faked? Surely there are anti counterfeiting measures. Wouldn't they have to use the same printers, have distinct handwriting. Basically it might be that it would be much harder to cover this up then anything we saw thus far and we all know they didn't do a good job on that.

Edit: would be nicr to hear from someone who professionally knows this stuff but my assumption is that there is a real chance shit will be discovered.

28
goldkeyboardwarrior 28 points ago +28 / -0

If they had an easy way to counterfeit the evidence, they probably wouldn't have resisted for so long. For example, if it only took them a week to fake everything, they could have said "check us" in early December so they can claim that there was no fraud and make us look dumb.

But nearly three months after the election, it's not hard to believe they eventually figured out the best way to fake the evidence. Otherwise, they may have blamed some random arsonist that committed suicide with a few gunshot wounds to the back of the head for destroying everything. Then the press reveals that the arsonist had social media pages created a week ago with nothing but pro-Trump stuff on them.

7
day221 7 points ago +8 / -1

It's easy to fake. The only hard part is making sure that no one involved spills the beans. The more people you bring in to help, the faster it goes, but the greater the risk you get exposed by a slip up or whistleblower. This way, with months to work with instead of days, they can prepare for the audit it with just a small number of people, get their stories straight, etc. The "tamper proof" seals for example can just be sealed after the fact as long as all parties that signed off are in on it, and so on.

10
BahamaDon 10 points ago +10 / -0

Compare the ballots in the boxes to the images of those ballots electronically. Easy to prove they are or are not the same physical ballots, or if they were scanned unfolded and folded after the fact. They cannot have folded the ballots, and then rescanned them in preparation for the audit, then somehow replaced all the scanned ballot images with the new images.

17
partly_asian-_- 17 points ago +17 / -0

From what I have heard is the 'scanned ballot' isn't a photocopy like would think it is. I've heard its a computer generated print out of what the ballot should be (or what they adjudicate it to be). I could be wrong but I have seen this in a ton of sources.

7
Loiuzein 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah it's not an actual copy of any kind, and chain-of-custody is completely broken. Those digital ballots are not evidence.

5
Ivleeeg 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is correct

8
Susurro 8 points ago +10 / -2

What we're looking for IS fakes. We actually hope there are fakes because we can prove the fraud. Jovan Pulitzer is updating on the situation: https://youtu.be/nAZiBpf-xtM

5
gunteh 5 points ago +5 / -0

They folded way to quickly when they still had additional stall options. Either they're totally f*cked or they covered things to the point that they dont care who knows.

3
MAGAlikeLINCOLN 3 points ago +3 / -0

You sure they had options?

3
Ivleeeg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure, appeal to SCOTUS. That gives them at least 8 more months.

2
gunteh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, one thing Bureaucracy does well is theres always a way to drag ones feet. Have you seen the Supreme Court non-rulings recently? Even they know how to avoid doing the proper thing until its way to late.

2
Manofmanytrades 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wonder who got picked to audit...either they found a complicit team, or they doctored the evidence.

2
DelveDeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

At a minimum there should be finger prints all over the ballots, either by the voters in which case there should be hundreds of thousands, or by the fraudsters in which case there should be very very few, or none, both of which would be an indication of fraud.

6
jdog 6 points ago +6 / -0

Be interesting if a team like Matt Braynard's got involved to help confirm the validity of each ballot with the voter. That may be the only way to tell.