I feel like him and Powell take a lot of heat from people who should REALLY be mad at sctus and our cucked out tranny military. Nothing lin said about voter fraud or the pedos was false.
I think what I'm saying is that we've passed the point where outlandish theories, which those are, are not worth our time. If they turn out to be true, happy frog dance. Until then, we have to proceed as if we have to do this ourselves.
They're openly admitting that reading the Dominion lawsuits (which I don't believe they really did) is what turned them against Sidney Powell.
Their problem is Stockholm Syndrome (if I'm being extremely charitable). They're not going to join any grassroots efforts to resist their new masters or defy them.
Making a habit of tiptoeing around the truth will not win these people back, and I'm beginning to understand that they are not worth winning back.
Give me a newly-awakened normie over every single one of these jerkoffs every time.
I like Sydney Powell but I don't trust this guy. Anyone who surrounds himself with a mystical cloak invoking God to dodge questions is not trustworthy.
You realize lawyers (at least the good ones) don't generally publicize all the evidence they have just to soothe the anxieties of people who don't know what the fuck they're talking about, don't you?
Anyway, he put a LOT out there. The fact that you didn't know about it or that it wasn't good enough for you is hardly his fault and it's hardly relevant to anything.
He owes us to stop Q fagging and giving smooth brains false hope. Leading to their continual inaction and cognitive dissonance which will cost us the country, our civilization, and our people.
How about all the false promises of salvation that were complete bullshit?
Secret good guys saving us, the military, you ask for an example go look at his tweet history leading up to Jan 20 and even beyond.
WHere's pences firing squad and trump installed as president?
Dealt with "my type" meaning people who live in the real world and don't believe in delusions? Delusions they need because they're too weak and afraid to face the truth of the situation?
How about all the false promises of salvation that were complete bullshit
He promised to save you? I'm not going to ask you again for a specific example.
Secret good guys saving us, the military, you ask for an example go look at his tweet history leading up to Jan 20 and even beyond.
He "predicted" the military would do this or he said they should?
WHere's pences firing squad and trump installed as president?
I remember him saying Pence *should * face a firing squad. If you have a specific example of him "predicting" that such a thing was going to happen, right fucking now would be the time to produce it. I don't think I need to explain to you what another failure on your part to do that will prove.
Dealt with "my type" meaning people who live in the real world and don't believe in delusions? Delusions they need because they're too weak and afraid to face the truth of the situation?
I don't know about all that. I was thinking more of people who want to swing their dicks around on the Internet, and then start whining and crying when they get challenged to back their faggotry up with facts.
I didn't ask for "sources." Cocksucking faggot. I asked you to provide a single example of Lin Wood or Sidney Powell (and you probably try to smear Mike Flynn as well) being untruthful or acting in bad faith, and you couldn't do it.
You whined, you cried, you lied. You used every contemptible lefty faggot tactic you could to try and worm your way out of backing up a single one of your bullshit claims about these people with facts.
Because you knew you were lying when you came in here talking shit.
What do you get paid to come in here and shit all over this community?
I am an attorney, so I come at this with my own bias, but if Lin was going to “put it out there” then he needed to really put it out there.
And he didn’t. He spouted off a lot and he referred to a lot of different things, but Mike Lindell provided more proof than Wood. (And yes, I 100% believe the election was stolen, but Lin did not prove it).
Thank you for the info. I’ve been skeptical of Powell as well. And I hate that President Trump had such terrible advisors during his term, but someone was right about distancing himself from Wood and Powell...
So you've seen everything Lin Wood had (for court, not for your personal consumption)?
True or false?
Lin Wood needed the money, and he needed to get his law practice established, even if he had to take a few risks or even play really loose with the truth, true or false?
Lin Wood is a snake oil salesman, how do you guys not see this yet? Literally nothing of his will come to fruition. And before you tell me "wELL hE PrEDicTeD peNCeS BetRaYAL" - that is literally the most softball 'prediction' he's made.
Bring on the downvotes and suck down that hopium, retards.
wELL hE PrEDicTeD peNCeS BetRaYAL" - that is literally the most softball 'prediction' he's made.
That's exactly the opposite of the way I remember it. I thought he was crazy then, because there wasn't a single fucking reason that anybody knew of to doubt Mike Pence at that point.
So what specifically was it that made that a "softball prediction?"
I feel like him and Powell take a lot of heat from people who should REALLY be mad at sctus and our cucked out tranny military. Nothing lin said about voter fraud or the pedos was false.
Or even Trump or the lawyers he had Rudy and Jenna atleast my guy is laying it all out no fucks to give and I respect it
According to Bryne Rudy and Mediocrity are either incompetent or way past their prime in Rudy's case.
What surprised me the most was that Trump was not involved in anything related to fraud, so what the hell was he doing?
Trump was busy being walled off by Meadows.
Not true. A couple of the rumored happenings appear to have been misinformation.
I don't think we can still say that the German servers story still seems plausible.
Hammer and Scorecard seem to be discredited as well.
Dang, we don't know sh*t.
When were they discredited?
Fair question.
I think what I'm saying is that we've passed the point where outlandish theories, which those are, are not worth our time. If they turn out to be true, happy frog dance. Until then, we have to proceed as if we have to do this ourselves.
Grass roots.
I mean, I think what you're saying is always true.
But when you say "they seem to be discredited," what are you talking about?
Discredited when? Discredited by whom? Discredited how?
It's not because such servers with international connectivity don't exist. They do.
It's not because Dominion machines weren't hooked up to the Internet. They were.
What, then?
I 100% agree with what you are saying.
None of that has been proven or disproven.
I'm trying to parse my language to appeal to those who are disaffected by hopium. Because I'm trying to push the grass roots efforts.
Grass roots efforts are going to be needed no matter how this plays out. Assuming there's any grass left.
So I apologize for my imprecise language. Those theories have not been discredited, they have been ignored and largely dismissed.....for now.
I don't think they're disaffected by hopium.
They're openly admitting that reading the Dominion lawsuits (which I don't believe they really did) is what turned them against Sidney Powell.
Their problem is Stockholm Syndrome (if I'm being extremely charitable). They're not going to join any grassroots efforts to resist their new masters or defy them.
Making a habit of tiptoeing around the truth will not win these people back, and I'm beginning to understand that they are not worth winning back.
Give me a newly-awakened normie over every single one of these jerkoffs every time.
I like it.
I'm not going to argue with a single thing you said.
The point I didn't explain well earlier is that those cases are currently bad PR because the consensus opinion is suggesting those were false.
I hope we one day know the truth about all of this, but I do hope your worldview ends up being the right one.
Good.
I like Sydney Powell but I don't trust this guy. Anyone who surrounds himself with a mystical cloak invoking God to dodge questions is not trustworthy.
Hes reading someone from 4chan trolling morons and telling them what they want to hear and believing them.
Lunatic Lynn
Where's Mike Pences firing squad and all the whitehats coming from the shadows to save us all???
Remember that?
Stop listening to con men taking advantage of our movement.
Every time Lin wood speaks he sounds more and more unhinged.
I totally swallowed the Wood...(and Sydney), but I’m sorry, I’m done with this shit.
I know our media refuses to uncuck themselves, but Wood has produced NOTHING so far and even OAN won’t show his shit.
So is it him not providing evidence or the media refusing to report on the evidence?
What exactly did Lin Wood owe you?
You realize lawyers (at least the good ones) don't generally publicize all the evidence they have just to soothe the anxieties of people who don't know what the fuck they're talking about, don't you?
Anyway, he put a LOT out there. The fact that you didn't know about it or that it wasn't good enough for you is hardly his fault and it's hardly relevant to anything.
He owes us to stop Q fagging and giving smooth brains false hope. Leading to their continual inaction and cognitive dissonance which will cost us the country, our civilization, and our people.
Isn't that enough?
Maybe you could explain how Lin Wood is "Q fagging" or provide a specific example.
But I've dealt with your type too many times to hold my breath.
How about all the false promises of salvation that were complete bullshit?
Secret good guys saving us, the military, you ask for an example go look at his tweet history leading up to Jan 20 and even beyond.
WHere's pences firing squad and trump installed as president?
Dealt with "my type" meaning people who live in the real world and don't believe in delusions? Delusions they need because they're too weak and afraid to face the truth of the situation?
He promised to save you? I'm not going to ask you again for a specific example.
He "predicted" the military would do this or he said they should?
I remember him saying Pence *should * face a firing squad. If you have a specific example of him "predicting" that such a thing was going to happen, right fucking now would be the time to produce it. I don't think I need to explain to you what another failure on your part to do that will prove.
I don't know about all that. I was thinking more of people who want to swing their dicks around on the Internet, and then start whining and crying when they get challenged to back their faggotry up with facts.
You sound like a delusional reddit bitch asking for sources but not accepting them. Let's not play pretend here.
Go back to reddit, you sad, brainwashed, delusional Q-faggot
I didn't ask for "sources." Cocksucking faggot. I asked you to provide a single example of Lin Wood or Sidney Powell (and you probably try to smear Mike Flynn as well) being untruthful or acting in bad faith, and you couldn't do it.
You whined, you cried, you lied. You used every contemptible lefty faggot tactic you could to try and worm your way out of backing up a single one of your bullshit claims about these people with facts.
Because you knew you were lying when you came in here talking shit.
What do you get paid to come in here and shit all over this community?
Get the fuck out of here. Lying bitch.
I am an attorney, so I come at this with my own bias, but if Lin was going to “put it out there” then he needed to really put it out there.
And he didn’t. He spouted off a lot and he referred to a lot of different things, but Mike Lindell provided more proof than Wood. (And yes, I 100% believe the election was stolen, but Lin did not prove it).
And what did you read?
Thank you for the info. I’ve been skeptical of Powell as well. And I hate that President Trump had such terrible advisors during his term, but someone was right about distancing himself from Wood and Powell...
Yeah, I bet those Dominion lawsuits make for some moving reading.
If you wanted to justify taking a shit on Sidney Powell, you might've at least found a somewhat less biased excuse for doing so.
So you've seen everything Lin Wood had (for court, not for your personal consumption)?
True or false?
Lin Wood needed the money, and he needed to get his law practice established, even if he had to take a few risks or even play really loose with the truth, true or false?
sun tzu would indicate that lin wood is in a weak position.
I believe in Lin and he will fight to the very end.
Why?
Lin Wood is a snake oil salesman, how do you guys not see this yet? Literally nothing of his will come to fruition. And before you tell me "wELL hE PrEDicTeD peNCeS BetRaYAL" - that is literally the most softball 'prediction' he's made.
Bring on the downvotes and suck down that hopium, retards.
This.
That's exactly the opposite of the way I remember it. I thought he was crazy then, because there wasn't a single fucking reason that anybody knew of to doubt Mike Pence at that point.
So what specifically was it that made that a "softball prediction?"
It was quite obvious what he was going to do to anyone with a brain. Just based on white house behavior at the time you knew.
Behavior such as?
Five times I have asked you for specific examples of the behavior you allege.
Five times, you've cried and moved the goalposts instead.
1 small example is the itinerary and meetings pence and trump had, come on man.
"iT wAs thE iTiNEraRy!" "it waS tHe MeeTINgs!"
Oddly enough, it was "the itinerary" and "the meetings" that clued me in to the fact that you're a sperging faggot.
Get a dictionary, and look up the definition of the word "specific."
Shut the fuck up until then.
You're a triggered mess. An embarrasment.
Shrug
I had no problem embarrassing your bitch ass.
I feel like Lin Wood would have even less problem with you than I did. What do you think?
Yeaaah! You agree. He'd fuck you up, bitch.
None of you faggots, that's for sure.