181
Comments (60)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
WU_HAN_FRU 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, Dominion told you that half her claims are outright lies. We established that much.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
WU_HAN_FRU 2 points ago +2 / -0

And, by thinking for myself, I'm guessing you haven't read it either.

By thinking for myself, I know that nothing you're describing about their lawsuits even makes sense, let alone sheds light on anything compelling, let alone constitutes proof.

That isn't necessarily the fault of the lawsuits themselves. That could just be your difficulty with describing it properly.

But Dominion has zero credibility.

It is an established matter of FACT that Dominion, with the collusion of local election officials in ALL of the states that were contested post-election, had its machines connected to the Internet, in violation of the law in all of those states.

It is an established matter of FACT that Dominion closed its offices in multiple countries (yes, that is a thing) and hid its employees post-election. That doesn't establish beyond reasonable doubt that they went to all this trouble to avoid the otherwise inevitable subpoenas, but it does establish probable cause, and they haven't offered an alternative explanation.

So when you say Dominion "proves" bad faith on SP's part, I'm straight laughing** at your weak shit, bro. And I don't believe you when you say you read it anyway. Those are the conclusions me thinking for myself has led me to.

If I'm wrong, proving me wrong should be easy. Do it.