You sound like a virtue signaling leftist, accusing your own people of "supremacy." I haven't seen a single post calling for the domination and subjugation of other races by whites.
I have never heard anyone say that. What I will say is that blacks are disproportianately homicidal. If that makes me a "white supremacist" in your mind, then there is no helping you.
legit - it's irrelevant to me if the hero of a show is yellow if he's a badass i identify with
i get what you're saying though, and that's part of the "representation/marginalization" aspect
The left has taken representation of blacks/browns to mean removing white and I don't agree with it, but at the same time, folks get fucken TRIGGERED if they see a mixed race couple
and here i just had a nasty thread about it cause i'm brown with a white wife
Aside from me disagreeing with the white supremacy shit you say is here (it’s not), what do you expect white people to do once they wake up? If you suddenly realized that you entire race and existence is under MASSIVE attack through discrimination and encouraging mixed breeding would you not rally against it? Ffs I’m not even white and I totally get where they’re coming from
They should understand they are being used and join us. They do not have to agree on everything, but stop the Democrat party from using the most vulnerable and the most elite.
What are your thoughts on this quotation by Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
"These guys are sitting there watching the destruction of our race while arguing about Ronald Reagan," Thomas said. "Ronald Reagan isn't the problem. Former president Jimmy Carter was not the problem. The lack of black leadership is the problem."
And what if a "white" person (or person of European descent) said something similar?
There is an issue nationwide because of the massive disinformation campaign by the mainstream media, politicians, and Big tech social media. It effects people in ways that are hard to measure and see. It has created hate and fear.
Also the paid trolls coming here lately have been non stop instigating such crap.
The real enemy wants to divide us so they can conquer us. We can only MAGA if we all band together as Americans.
We can only MAGA if we all band together as Americans.
Does that include voting for Donald Trump with considerably more than 20% of their group? Especially after all the things that Donald Trump did for them? 500 billion dollars, higher employment rate, getting people with light drug sentences out of prison, etc. etc. etc.
And are they not responsible for their own decisions, choices and the like? Are they not fully and solely responsible at this point in time for 13/52? They are not children without responsibility of their own, they are adults like everyone else!
What about large proportions of people that prefer tearing the USA down instead of even attempting to participate, even when helped to the extreme again and again and again?
It takes two to tango and to make things work. One is not sufficient.
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
"These guys are sitting there watching the destruction of our race while arguing about Ronald Reagan," Thomas said. "Ronald Reagan isn't the problem. Former president Jimmy Carter was not the problem. The lack of black leadership is the problem."
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
For some fucken reason, this site has lost sight of that
Could you give concrete examples of that?
A black person saying "only reproduce with blacks" is not
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
"These guys are sitting there watching the destruction of our race while arguing about Ronald Reagan," Thomas said. "Ronald Reagan isn't the problem. Former president Jimmy Carter was not the problem. The lack of black leadership is the problem."
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
For some fucken reason, this site has lost sight of that
Could you give concrete examples of that?
A black person saying "only reproduce with blacks" is not
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
I think I understand what you're trying to say - maybe it's the formatting
no - demanding representation of your race isn't supremacy per say
this site is losing site of the preaching of MLK in which folks are lumping in groups based on skin color, more now than seemingly ever
not all black people are african american so...
i describe through skin color cause it's exactly that, a descriptor. The arbitrary skin color seems to be what people are so fixated on, white supremes or otherwise.
idk what is confusing about anything i said, it was pretty cut and dry and I do not sense any type of genuine conversation being attempted here
Fighting against supposed racism is just another way to manipulate and control people through what is essentially religion.
Imagine an ancient ruler who tells his people that half of them are possessed by an evil demon and must be rooted out, suppressed and, maybe someday cured. Half the people are filled with self doubt and the other half become a zero cost police force.
"The upper class keeps all of the money, pay none of the taxes. The middle class pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there... just to scare the shit out of the middle class. Keep 'em showing up at those jobs."
First step, the government creates a problem or the perception of a problem. In this case it's "white supremacy".
Most, if not all, of the so-called "white supremacist" groups and "Boogaloo militias" are created by FBI/CIA agents and/or lawyers from various NGOs like the ADL and SPLC pretending to be white supremacists.
The only purpose is to bird dog so that they can smear white people as "becoming radicalized" which will be used as justification for targeting white people.
This is what's playing out with Wray and Sullivan. Sullivan is a known black activist and agitator, is on video saying he was going to pose as a Trump-supporter to storm the Capitol was arrested by the FBI. Wray knows this and yet he purjured himself before Congress. Why? Because Sullivan is an FBI asset and it allows Wray to continue with the false narrative that "white supremacy is on the rise" as a pretense to crack down on us uppity Americans.
Bonus points if you have the ability to change metrics or testing so you can fix the fictitious problem and take credit. Alternatively, convince people that eternal truths are a problem to be fixed and can only be fixed with impossible solutions. Since the solution will never come and the problem will continue, you will always be able to blame the made up problem. Totally not talking about Covid or climate change though.
They're also creating (or hallucinating into existence) pandemics, in this case Covid, so they can step in, fix it and then pat themselves on the back for being our saviors. They aren't called the managerial class for nothing.
Like as in create the virus and the vaccine at the same time (Gain of Function research) and then release the disease, funnel billions to Big Pharma knowing all along the vaccine has been produced, pocket millions, and slowly release it to the public. Create the problem and protect us from the problem but always let the problem linger until it is needed again (like every 4 years).
It’s actually worse than that. They begin with the assumption that ANY racial disparity in ANY area of society is “proof” of “systematic racism” and then refocus all resources to solve this problem often at the cost of neglecting the majority. How is this worse? There is scientific evidence of racial differences in many traits(IQ, work ethic, impulsivity, delayed gratification, etc); if we assume this theory is even partially accurate there is no “solving” the “problem” because there is no problem to solve. Social justice is caught in a paradox that will inevitably destroy everything it touches.
Called the Rothschild Paradigm: First, create the problem then,
provide the solution. The Dystopics (aka, Democrats, Deep State,
etc.) have been employing this paradigm to deceive and manipulate
the unsuspecting public for nearly 120 years.
Called the Rothschild Paradigm: First, create the problem
then, provide the solution. These dystopic bastards have
been employing this paradigm on the unsuspecting public
for nearly 120 years. Sometimes referred to as a 'false
flag'.
If you solved the problems you preach about for political clout, you lose your funding. That's why you never actually do anything and just keep telling people to give you money and you'll eventually (code for NEVER) figure it out.
No, racism is designed to divide Americans. In other countries they were able to divide people on economic classes, workers vs owners, but that didn't gain much traction here because we all want to be rich, we don't hate rich people we want to be them, so they had to pivot to race abs that's going pretty well.
It's what happens when you finally make it to the top of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. You find out that having a need is a need. So you create one - that can never be solved.
They create the crisis they already have a solution for and sell the solution. I’m still trying to figure out their reasoning of profiting from destroying the race majority of the populace, doesn’t make sense to me. But then again, I’m not a faggot like they are. 😐
Yup, that's how they operate. Cause, Conflate and Create problems in order to sell their pre concocted solution in order to enrich themselves and their friends.
Democrat's motto--never let a crisis go to waste.
Their behavior says if there is not crisis to exploit, create one.
yup - i've been seeing WAY too much white supreme bullshit on our site and it's fucken aids
Shitty part is, even if they are legit people, i don't blame them to a certain extent
They are being pushed and marginalized by the establishment and to expect them to lay down and take it is foolish
The left is creating a monster no one wants
You sound like a virtue signaling leftist, accusing your own people of "supremacy." I haven't seen a single post calling for the domination and subjugation of other races by whites.
domination and subjugation aren't the only tenants of supremacy
not to mention - white supremes aren't going to outright say they're white supremes here if they are trying to recruit
it's the equivalent of a communist saying they're not a communist but a socialist
same subversion/recruitment, different reason
It is literally the definition of the word, you fuckwit. Are you proposing that it has an alternate definition?
I'm suggesting there's more than those two tenants (ie my race is better than every other race by the very nature that we are x color)
To suggest you MUST claim you want dominion and subjection for it to be supremacy is ridiculous
I have never heard anyone say that. What I will say is that blacks are disproportianately homicidal. If that makes me a "white supremacist" in your mind, then there is no helping you.
Not at all - it's a fact
folks condemning "race mixing" has a hint of supremacy in it
I don't care about race mixing sometimes people love people from another race. It's organic, for whatever reason they're into it.
However when every commercial or show all of a sudden shows every couple as mixed when the reality is its not as common...that is indoctrination.
It just shouldn't matter
legit - it's irrelevant to me if the hero of a show is yellow if he's a badass i identify with
i get what you're saying though, and that's part of the "representation/marginalization" aspect
The left has taken representation of blacks/browns to mean removing white and I don't agree with it, but at the same time, folks get fucken TRIGGERED if they see a mixed race couple
and here i just had a nasty thread about it cause i'm brown with a white wife
no one gets triggered about that though we get pissed at the blatant propaganda being pushed down our throats.
im not referring to the blatant propaganda, I already addressed that (I think).
some folks will screech about a normal American couple who's mixed race in the background in a movie
Aside from me disagreeing with the white supremacy shit you say is here (it’s not), what do you expect white people to do once they wake up? If you suddenly realized that you entire race and existence is under MASSIVE attack through discrimination and encouraging mixed breeding would you not rally against it? Ffs I’m not even white and I totally get where they’re coming from
They should understand they are being used and join us. They do not have to agree on everything, but stop the Democrat party from using the most vulnerable and the most elite.
What are your thoughts on this quotation by Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
And what if a "white" person (or person of European descent) said something similar?
I do not agree with racial oppression
white, black, yellow, brown - it doesn't matter
White people are actively being oppressed
Blacks/Brown people were actively oppressed f
Thomas is correct - black/brown culture is shit and is the result of white oppression (LBJ, war on drugs, welfare state etc)
A white person saying "we need representation" is completely and totally correct and fine
A black person saying "Kill the crackers" is not A black person saying "only reproduce with blacks" is not
A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not
it's not complicated
It's not the color - it's the content.
That's what MAGA is
For some fucken reason, this site
has lostseems to be losing sight of thatThere is an issue nationwide because of the massive disinformation campaign by the mainstream media, politicians, and Big tech social media. It effects people in ways that are hard to measure and see. It has created hate and fear.
Also the paid trolls coming here lately have been non stop instigating such crap.
The real enemy wants to divide us so they can conquer us. We can only MAGA if we all band together as Americans.
Does that include voting for Donald Trump with considerably more than 20% of their group? Especially after all the things that Donald Trump did for them? 500 billion dollars, higher employment rate, getting people with light drug sentences out of prison, etc. etc. etc.
And are they not responsible for their own decisions, choices and the like? Are they not fully and solely responsible at this point in time for 13/52? They are not children without responsibility of their own, they are adults like everyone else!
What about large proportions of people that prefer tearing the USA down instead of even attempting to participate, even when helped to the extreme again and again and again?
It takes two to tango and to make things work. One is not sufficient.
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
Could you give concrete examples of that?
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
nothing you said was coherent - hence the lack of a reply
But you know fully well that what I wrote was fully coherent, and there is no doubt about that.
Again (from https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLe7vVIB9 ):
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
Could you give concrete examples of that?
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
I think I understand what you're trying to say - maybe it's the formatting
no - demanding representation of your race isn't supremacy per say
this site is losing site of the preaching of MLK in which folks are lumping in groups based on skin color, more now than seemingly ever
not all black people are african american so...
i describe through skin color cause it's exactly that, a descriptor. The arbitrary skin color seems to be what people are so fixated on, white supremes or otherwise.
idk what is confusing about anything i said, it was pretty cut and dry and I do not sense any type of genuine conversation being attempted here
Fighting against supposed racism is just another way to manipulate and control people through what is essentially religion.
Imagine an ancient ruler who tells his people that half of them are possessed by an evil demon and must be rooted out, suppressed and, maybe someday cured. Half the people are filled with self doubt and the other half become a zero cost police force.
I like your metaphoric illustration.
Perfect analogy to the technique they’re using. Has been done repeatedly over history
Pass the glue, my friend, this is some good shit big nostril inhale
Hegelian Dialectic
Lol, I should read the comments before making my own
Nothing wrong with duplicating info, especially when it's showcasing the Left's playbook.
It's never been about racism, only classism.
"The upper class keeps all of the money, pay none of the taxes. The middle class pays all of the taxes, does all of the work. The poor are there... just to scare the shit out of the middle class. Keep 'em showing up at those jobs."
George Carlin was an idiot.
Broken clock is right twice a day, dude.
Hegelian Dialectic.
Problem. Reaction. Solution.
First step, the government creates a problem or the perception of a problem. In this case it's "white supremacy".
Most, if not all, of the so-called "white supremacist" groups and "Boogaloo militias" are created by FBI/CIA agents and/or lawyers from various NGOs like the ADL and SPLC pretending to be white supremacists.
The only purpose is to bird dog so that they can smear white people as "becoming radicalized" which will be used as justification for targeting white people.
This is what's playing out with Wray and Sullivan. Sullivan is a known black activist and agitator, is on video saying he was going to pose as a Trump-supporter to storm the Capitol was arrested by the FBI. Wray knows this and yet he purjured himself before Congress. Why? Because Sullivan is an FBI asset and it allows Wray to continue with the false narrative that "white supremacy is on the rise" as a pretense to crack down on us uppity Americans.
"Bird dog." Is that anything like (the fictitious) dog whistle?
It's so hard to keep up with the constant changes imposed by the Ministry of Truth. Who have we always been at war with again?
It's when activists go to rallies to start violence.
Anyone up for some Hegelian dialect?
It ends by talking about tragedy.
The book Tragedy and Hope is the main achievement of the Clinton's most influential Prof, Carroll Quigley. Their "hope" is OWG, One World Government.
One of the structural problems with our nation - The leaders don’t want us to feel safe so that they have power.
"This is pure evil."
Yup, it's a communist tactic
Bonus points if you have the ability to change metrics or testing so you can fix the fictitious problem and take credit. Alternatively, convince people that eternal truths are a problem to be fixed and can only be fixed with impossible solutions. Since the solution will never come and the problem will continue, you will always be able to blame the made up problem. Totally not talking about Covid or climate change though.
The FBI does the same thing with terror 'plots'
Reeducation camps get expensive!
They're also creating (or hallucinating into existence) pandemics, in this case Covid, so they can step in, fix it and then pat themselves on the back for being our saviors. They aren't called the managerial class for nothing.
Good term - managerial class.
Its so they can spend billions eradicating YOU
No. They are creating racism to divide and conquer us.
Problem, Reaction, Solution
Democrats: inventing problems that only they know how to solve, so you vote for them.
NO NO NO
They don't create problems so they can funnel money into fixing them, they create problems so they have an excuse to funnel money TO MAKE IT WORSE!
Like as in create the virus and the vaccine at the same time (Gain of Function research) and then release the disease, funnel billions to Big Pharma knowing all along the vaccine has been produced, pocket millions, and slowly release it to the public. Create the problem and protect us from the problem but always let the problem linger until it is needed again (like every 4 years).
It's the age old Hegelian dialectic of problem- reaction- solution
Those who think there's another option than secession, please post it here:
It’s actually worse than that. They begin with the assumption that ANY racial disparity in ANY area of society is “proof” of “systematic racism” and then refocus all resources to solve this problem often at the cost of neglecting the majority. How is this worse? There is scientific evidence of racial differences in many traits(IQ, work ethic, impulsivity, delayed gratification, etc); if we assume this theory is even partially accurate there is no “solving” the “problem” because there is no problem to solve. Social justice is caught in a paradox that will inevitably destroy everything it touches.
Called the Rothschild Paradigm: First, create the problem then, provide the solution. The Dystopics (aka, Democrats, Deep State, etc.) have been employing this paradigm to deceive and manipulate the unsuspecting public for nearly 120 years.
Don't forget the fund raising!
War on Drugs War on Terror
War on Covid War on Racism
Nothing to see here.
Called the Rothschild Paradigm: First, create the problem then, provide the solution. These dystopic bastards have been employing this paradigm on the unsuspecting public for nearly 120 years. Sometimes referred to as a 'false flag'.
Racism is the perfect grift. Climate change doesn't motivate anyone anymore and they don't get to call you a racist if they don't agree with you.
Ding ding ding!! What do we have for him, Johnny ?
Progressives seek Dependence. They will create it if necessary ie false flags, bail reform, immigration etc...
If you solved the problems you preach about for political clout, you lose your funding. That's why you never actually do anything and just keep telling people to give you money and you'll eventually (code for NEVER) figure it out.
They learned they don't even have to create a problem. All they do is tell you there's a problem and the NPCs believe it.
Believe nothing they say, observe the results of what they do, and You'll see that NO COMPROMISE with anti-white commies
No, racism is designed to divide Americans. In other countries they were able to divide people on economic classes, workers vs owners, but that didn't gain much traction here because we all want to be rich, we don't hate rich people we want to be them, so they had to pivot to race abs that's going pretty well.
It's what happens when you finally make it to the top of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. You find out that having a need is a need. So you create one - that can never be solved.
they only "fund" the fix because they need to hole 99.99% of the funds somehow for them to pocket.
It's more devious than that. They're crashing the entire economic system. It was supposed to fail long ago. They're impatient with our resilience.
They create the crisis they already have a solution for and sell the solution. I’m still trying to figure out their reasoning of profiting from destroying the race majority of the populace, doesn’t make sense to me. But then again, I’m not a faggot like they are. 😐
Create the problem, THEN, ride in on your democratic horse to fix it with all OUR tax dollars that somehow end up in their pockets. #organizedcrime
Hegelian dialectic
the FBI told everyone their secret now everyone is copying their work without changing the answers
You're missing a key point there. They create problems and then fund the fix, and within the fix they always take some for themselves.
Yup, that's how they operate. Cause, Conflate and Create problems in order to sell their pre concocted solution in order to enrich themselves and their friends.
And by fix you mean funnel funds through family and friends right back into their pockets.
Dead accurate. Xiden is already granting millions and millions to fight “equality and racism”. It’s a scam soo blatant
They're not even fixing the issue they created though, they're just using it as an excuse to get more taxpayer dollars
The correct name for this is called Hegalien Dialect. Problem, reaction, solution.
Perhaps it is what they wanted all along?
Yes. This is common practice for leftists since forever. Took you long to notice this pattern.
No. WE fund the fix
They don't fix the problems they create, though. They just line their pockets and throw money at things and it only makes things worse.