There is an issue nationwide because of the massive disinformation campaign by the mainstream media, politicians, and Big tech social media. It effects people in ways that are hard to measure and see. It has created hate and fear.
Also the paid trolls coming here lately have been non stop instigating such crap.
The real enemy wants to divide us so they can conquer us. We can only MAGA if we all band together as Americans.
We can only MAGA if we all band together as Americans.
Does that include voting for Donald Trump with considerably more than 20% of their group? Especially after all the things that Donald Trump did for them? 500 billion dollars, higher employment rate, getting people with light drug sentences out of prison, etc. etc. etc.
And are they not responsible for their own decisions, choices and the like? Are they not fully and solely responsible at this point in time for 13/52? They are not children without responsibility of their own, they are adults like everyone else!
What about large proportions of people that prefer tearing the USA down instead of even attempting to participate, even when helped to the extreme again and again and again?
It takes two to tango and to make things work. One is not sufficient.
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
"These guys are sitting there watching the destruction of our race while arguing about Ronald Reagan," Thomas said. "Ronald Reagan isn't the problem. Former president Jimmy Carter was not the problem. The lack of black leadership is the problem."
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
For some fucken reason, this site has lost sight of that
Could you give concrete examples of that?
A black person saying "only reproduce with blacks" is not
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
"These guys are sitting there watching the destruction of our race while arguing about Ronald Reagan," Thomas said. "Ronald Reagan isn't the problem. Former president Jimmy Carter was not the problem. The lack of black leadership is the problem."
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
For some fucken reason, this site has lost sight of that
Could you give concrete examples of that?
A black person saying "only reproduce with blacks" is not
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
There is an issue nationwide because of the massive disinformation campaign by the mainstream media, politicians, and Big tech social media. It effects people in ways that are hard to measure and see. It has created hate and fear.
Also the paid trolls coming here lately have been non stop instigating such crap.
The real enemy wants to divide us so they can conquer us. We can only MAGA if we all band together as Americans.
Does that include voting for Donald Trump with considerably more than 20% of their group? Especially after all the things that Donald Trump did for them? 500 billion dollars, higher employment rate, getting people with light drug sentences out of prison, etc. etc. etc.
And are they not responsible for their own decisions, choices and the like? Are they not fully and solely responsible at this point in time for 13/52? They are not children without responsibility of their own, they are adults like everyone else!
What about large proportions of people that prefer tearing the USA down instead of even attempting to participate, even when helped to the extreme again and again and again?
It takes two to tango and to make things work. One is not sufficient.
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
Could you give concrete examples of that?
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
But you know fully well that what I wrote was fully coherent, and there is no doubt about that.
Again (from https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLe7vVIB9 ):
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
Could you give concrete examples of that?
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.