So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
"These guys are sitting there watching the destruction of our race while arguing about Ronald Reagan," Thomas said. "Ronald Reagan isn't the problem. Former president Jimmy Carter was not the problem. The lack of black leadership is the problem."
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
For some fucken reason, this site has lost sight of that
Could you give concrete examples of that?
A black person saying "only reproduce with blacks" is not
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
no - demanding representation of your race isn't supremacy per say
But is that all that Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? He also wrote about "the destruction of our race". Is it wrong or "supremes" to "worry about about the destruction of one's race"? I don't personally share that view (I have a somewhat different view). And I don't have something against people that have that view.
And what do you mean by "per say"?
not all black people are african american so...
i describe through skin color cause it's exactly that, a descriptor. The arbitrary skin color seems to be what people are so fixated on, white supremes or otherwise.
Yet you are the one to continue to insist on describe and group people by the color of their skin, not me, and you know that fully well. And as I wrote, it is extremely superficial to describe it as such, and it is definitely not all people that do that.
For some fucken reason, this site has lost sight of that
Could you give concrete examples of that?
A black person saying "only reproduce with blacks" is not
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
idk what is confusing about anything i said, it was pretty cut and dry and I do not sense any type of genuine conversation being attempted here
So first you write in https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLeCWTBSd that my comment is not coherent, which is blatantly false and you know that well and also distracts from the debate, and now you again seem to distract on purpose.
You seem very focused on "white supremes", yet would Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas fit into that category or similar category, and would that be an issue if so? Are your definition consistents? You seem to care much, much, much more about "white supremes" than caring about BLM or Antifa or the left or the communists generally in any meaningful way, though I would hope I am mistaken about that.
But you know fully well that what I wrote was fully coherent, and there is no doubt about that.
Again (from https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLe7vVIB9 ):
So, in your opinion, it would be fine if a person of European descent said something similar to what Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? (from https://archive.li/pS4ck ):
For those people writing about "white supremacists", would they consider the above examples of "supremacism"?
Could you give concrete examples of that?
Are African-Americans not entitled to their own opinions?
And why do you keep describing people through skin color? Why not describe African-Americans as African-Americans? As one example, lumping them in with for instance South Indians is not right or fair, for while South Indians tend to have very dark skin color, South Indians are extremely different from Sub-Saharan Africans. Why write about "brown people"? Why do you go for something so incredibly superficial?
As a side-note, reg. "A yellow person saying "Whites are inherently inferior" is not" , I would wonder or ask about which aspects the given group were considered "inferior" regarding.
(first comment: https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLe7vTMhe ).
But is that all that Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas said? He also wrote about "the destruction of our race". Is it wrong or "supremes" to "worry about about the destruction of one's race"? I don't personally share that view (I have a somewhat different view). And I don't have something against people that have that view.
And what do you mean by "per say"?
Yet you are the one to continue to insist on describe and group people by the color of their skin, not me, and you know that fully well. And as I wrote, it is extremely superficial to describe it as such, and it is definitely not all people that do that.
So first you write in https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLeCWTBSd that my comment is not coherent, which is blatantly false and you know that well and also distracts from the debate, and now you again seem to distract on purpose.
You seem very focused on "white supremes", yet would Associate Justice of the SCOTUS Clarence Thomas fit into that category or similar category, and would that be an issue if so? Are your definition consistents? You seem to care much, much, much more about "white supremes" than caring about BLM or Antifa or the left or the communists generally in any meaningful way, though I would hope I am mistaken about that.