So you again lie intentionally (and seek to distract and derail among other tactics and tricks) about my formatting being hard to follow or that it is incoherent.
I'm focused on white supremes trying to recruit/infiltrate this site yes - because they are desperate for sympathy
No, Thomas is not a supremacist, no person concerned with the destruction of their race/peoples is - i'm pretty sure i made that clear in my long list of examples of what is supremacy and what isnt'
of course I'm concerned about black supremacists - i don't like this race bullshit whatsoever
Yet you seem extremely much more focused on "white supremes" than other topics, including leftists, Antifa, deep state, etc., despite those topics being incredibly much more important and relevant and present. Are you BLM despite what you claim?
And previously, you qualified it with "per say" reg. what Clarence Thomas said and whether someone is a "white supremes".
i grew up late 90's/early 2000's and want to go back to shit being normal
Normal like with O. J. Simpson? And what about 13/52? Continuing mass immigration (and extremely far from the best of those countries they came from, despite the peoples of many of those countries generally not achieving much at all and instead destroying things in their own countries) from people extremely hostile to the USA and its core and fundamental ways and the like? Etc. etc. etc. And this kind of stuff was very much also present back in the 90s. And communism has been a growing and extreme danger long before that.
You seem fully aware that your definitions are not at all consistent, and you distract and use various other tactics and tricks. You seem more than fine with communism, BLM, Antifa, etc., despite what you spend tiny amounts of time paying lip service to. It wouldn't surprise me if you are Antifa or BLM and a communist, using the specter of "white supremes" in various ways.
What are your thoughts on 13/52? Is it an issue, and if so, how great an issue is it? Is it acceptable in any way whatsoever? And who's responsible for that, and what should those responsible do differently?
(first comment: https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLe7vTMhe ).
So you again lie intentionally (and seek to distract and derail among other tactics and tricks) about my formatting being hard to follow or that it is incoherent.
Yet you seem extremely much more focused on "white supremes" than other topics, including leftists, Antifa, deep state, etc., despite those topics being incredibly much more important and relevant and present. Are you BLM despite what you claim?
And previously, you qualified it with "per say" reg. what Clarence Thomas said and whether someone is a "white supremes".
Normal like with O. J. Simpson? And what about 13/52? Continuing mass immigration (and extremely far from the best of those countries they came from, despite the peoples of many of those countries generally not achieving much at all and instead destroying things in their own countries) from people extremely hostile to the USA and its core and fundamental ways and the like? Etc. etc. etc. And this kind of stuff was very much also present back in the 90s. And communism has been a growing and extreme danger long before that.
You seem fully aware that your definitions are not at all consistent, and you distract and use various other tactics and tricks. You seem more than fine with communism, BLM, Antifa, etc., despite what you spend tiny amounts of time paying lip service to. It wouldn't surprise me if you are Antifa or BLM and a communist, using the specter of "white supremes" in various ways.
What are your thoughts on 13/52? Is it an issue, and if so, how great an issue is it? Is it acceptable in any way whatsoever? And who's responsible for that, and what should those responsible do differently?
See also https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLe7vVIB9 , https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLeCXb1kW and https://patriots.win/p/12hkYNlwu4/x/c/4DyLeCXdETY .