1085
Comments (34)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
GiveMe1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven’t been able to find any official source saying that they have or have not isolated the virus. Does anyone have one going either way? All I see is “journalists” saying they did, but no announcement or proof from any “health” orgs

2
borscht-nazi 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://gab.com/robinmonotti/posts/105734791834850133

https://www.bitchute.com/video/iqPoUQXHwD6K/

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

Page 42, 2ⁿᵈ sentence of the 2ⁿᵈ paragraph:

"Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA"

"... no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use ..."

no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988269/

https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/cdc-929-dead-and-15923-injured-following-experimental-mrna-covid-injections-february-12-update.html

https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/

1
GiveMe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you

Unfortunately, from the ncbi link:

“The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV.”

1
borscht-nazi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Per PCR testing methodology employed by the study which has been proven outright fraudulent. So, what's your point?

1
GiveMe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh shit dawg

1
2
borscht-nazi 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://gab.com/robinmonotti/posts/105734791834850133

https://www.bitchute.com/video/iqPoUQXHwD6K/

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

Page 42, 2ⁿᵈ sentence of the 2ⁿᵈ paragraph:

"Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA"

"... no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use ..."

no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988269/

https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/cdc-929-dead-and-15923-injured-following-experimental-mrna-covid-injections-february-12-update.html

https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/

0
14DaysToFlatten 0 points ago +1 / -1

"at the time the test was developed and this study conducted"

(Repeat, with bold letters)

1
borscht-nazi 1 point ago +1 / -0

And? Refute with new findings then.

1
GiveMe1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately I don’t know enough to dispute the CDC isolation claim as I’m just not a virologist. Seems legit to me though.

The PCR test stuff she talks about is dead on though. There is also bonus video of the inventor saying Fauci is a bureaucrat and doesn’t know a damn thing lol: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cTWN_PJ8t2o

2
14DaysToFlatten 2 points ago +2 / -0

It doesn't take a chef to determine that a shit sandwich stinks. Hang in there. Dr Seuss > Dr Fauci.