So instead of staying, where she can actually help viewers understand the problems and truth, she abandons her role and quits, leaving it to be filled by some new sheep that will parrot whatever they are told?
I call that a quitter, someone not willing to face the backlash of showing her opinion on the matter in front of her viewers. She could be much more impactful if she had stayed and devoted herself to highlighting the "truth" and doing all the things she mentioned are lacking.
where she can actually help viewers understand the problems and truth
By reading off a teleprompter? You do understand what an Anchor does, right? That's why she quit, she has no control over the words she is required to read out. If she had just gone off script they would have cut the feed, fired her without benefits, and then sued her for breach of contract.
Going off your response, we need people with our shared values and beliefs to get into those positions of actual control. It may be difficult, especially with the filth as you go closer to the top, but there really needs to be an attempt to not just completely cede ground to the enemy.
It takes courage to make a sacrifice like that. How many people like the money or status of their position enough that they'll suffer through critical race theory HR presentations they don't believe in? Most.
Her leaving with those comments is the biggest red pill she will ever have the opportunity to present. News isn't 100% live, and if she spoke the truth on a subject, they'd simply cut her out of the broadcast and fire her.
So instead of staying, where she can actually help viewers understand the problems and truth, she abandons her role and quits, leaving it to be filled by some new sheep that will parrot whatever they are told?
I call that a quitter, someone not willing to face the backlash of showing her opinion on the matter in front of her viewers. She could be much more impactful if she had stayed and devoted herself to highlighting the "truth" and doing all the things she mentioned are lacking.
Brave isn't what I'd call it.
She’d be fired if she stayed on and spoke the truth.
At least this way she got to go out on her own.
By reading off a teleprompter? You do understand what an Anchor does, right? That's why she quit, she has no control over the words she is required to read out. If she had just gone off script they would have cut the feed, fired her without benefits, and then sued her for breach of contract.
Going off your response, we need people with our shared values and beliefs to get into those positions of actual control. It may be difficult, especially with the filth as you go closer to the top, but there really needs to be an attempt to not just completely cede ground to the enemy.
I wanted to be a political journalist. I really wanted to. It’s just such a toxic environment, idk if anyone would willingly try it
You can't get in those positions smart guy. If the best of us couldn't do it, it's because the communist infiltrated system is designed that way.
That's part of it. They also laugh, comment, and provide unscripted opinion.
It takes courage to make a sacrifice like that. How many people like the money or status of their position enough that they'll suffer through critical race theory HR presentations they don't believe in? Most.
Lmao, quitting lying is not being a quitter.
She had an opportunity to make a real difference, but she bailed on it, because bailing was easier
You are clearly oblivious to how the industry works. The anchors don't get to decide what they say. They read what was written by others.
Does she work and control the entire station by herself? Didn't know that, she should run the entire government by herself as well then
Her leaving with those comments is the biggest red pill she will ever have the opportunity to present. News isn't 100% live, and if she spoke the truth on a subject, they'd simply cut her out of the broadcast and fire her.
He's too stupid to understand this