232
Comments (3)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
becky21k1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Said it before, will say it again. This is the wrong way to go at this. It means endless litigation from some group with at this point a potential loss at the Supreme Court level.

You have to short circuit their potential attack and the only way I see to do it is turn their own "fairness" argument back on them and make the rule be they compete with whichever team their strength level compares favorably with, so there's no competitive advantage.