So accurate. They worship infanticide, preach degeneracy, wage war on every good tradition and value, normalize political violence, weaponize government institutions, and abolish freedom wherever good men refuse to do something about it
Marxism replaces worship of God with worship of the state. You cannot, however, build one on top of the other. It is first necessary to eliminate worship of God.
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.
They are a minority though. They're only brazen because they have all the social and political power. The real mob that's dangerous is the silent majority because they're silent and allow the left to run America into the ground and degenerate the youth.
The left/right dichotomy is like 2 actors playing their respective roles perfectly and then being surprised the movie ends like it was written.
Which is the only reason this nonsense goes on. If people would stand up for basic principles (not even one party, just stand up for things like the law, fairness, following the Constitution) they would never get away with this.
Of all the numerous forms that governments have taken over the centuries, of all the concepts and institutions that have been tried, none has succeeded in keeping the State in check.
If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind?
Are you suggesting that we voted for this? Election fraud has been happening. We know it’s been happening for some time. WE elected better leaders than this, but that’s not who won.
That's not a response to my claim. Of course the "organizers" are just as bad as anybody else. Shoot, they're probably worse on average.
But anarchy doesn't solve the problem. People will always seek power and to force their will on others. Lack of government won't change that, it just changes the avenues through which it's obtained.
Now, if you want to argue for Anarchy or Libertarianism based on principle that's fine. But if your argument is based on some expected outcome then you're as foolish as the communists. Especially if you fail to acknowledge human nature as the source of most of mankind's problems.
Lack of government won't change that, it just changes the avenues through which it's obtained.
It changes the scope and scale of that aggression if people do not widely view it as legitimate.
I do argue mostly from principle, even if government does lead to better outcomes it does not make it morally acceptable in the same way that slavery is detestable even if it leads to cheaper cotton.
Especially if you fail to acknowledge human nature as the source of most of mankind's problems.
It absolutely is, and Libertarianism is not a utopian vision that claims to end all the ills of humanity, only to reduce or eliminate the most dangerous result of those flaws.
All belief in "government" rests on the idea that the "common good" justifies the "legal" initiation of violence against innocents to one degree or another. And once that premise has been accepted, there is no objective moral standard to limit "government" behavior.
Subjective opinions about moral authority have nothing to do with the objective fact that nothing restrains anyone or anything's authority, be it an individual or a business or a government, besides force; a fact that's been explained to you more than once, yet you continue spamming quotes about the "failures to limit government" as if it's a valid argument for anarchism.
A mugger may be able to compel you to give up your wallet by threatening you with a level of violence you can't meet, but this is separate from the idea of authority.
Authority is the idea that such an action is morally acceptable, and so long as people believe the coercion of government to be morally acceptable they will be accomplices in the violence of the State.
Again, subjective moral opinions have nothing to do with force being the only thing that restrains all of those actions.
It's interesting how flexible your line between "people" and "the State" is. Why wouldn't the people be responsible for their own government? Ideally they'd be the active participants in the violence against their enemies, rather than shunting the entire affair to bureaucracies where it's easier to corrupt.
A mugger may be able to compel you to give up your wallet by threatening you with a level of violence you can't meet, but this is separate from the idea of authority.
I like some of the quotes you toss about but damn, you're so-close/so-far on this. All authority derives from violence. There's literally no alternative. (In my case, username very much related). You can't hand-wave away the fact that the implementation of governmental authority requires, and indeed fully and completely depends upon, violence. By archaic law and careful script you might be the "rightful" ruler of a state, and thus hold full moral authority to rule relative to, say, some brigands that have taken over. But without the violence, you have precisely fuck-all.
I agree. I found his past opinions on the Patriot Act to be concerning. I was hoping the hate he recieved would forge another Thomas. So far I would say I have been very, very wrong.
His participation in cleaning up the Bush / Gore mess was taken as a sign that "ZOMG -- HE'S OUR GUY!!!" The confirmation clown show Kavanaugh "endured" was the public humiliation required for lifetime employment.
According to Robert Barnes, Kennedy made a demand to have Kavanaugh as his replacement as a condition to retiring at that time., and that Barrett is Mitch's choice.
When it was revealed during confirmation that he only has women law clerks as a rule - due to his belief that women don’t get equal access to careers in law - that was a flashing red siren that he is a soft leftist cuck. Even RBG praised him on that policy once he joined the SC. He cried and pleaded like a bitch in front of the Senate who repeatedly attacked and humiliated him, including Kamala Harris who straight out called him a serial rapist in front of his wife and two young girls. What kind of man sits there and silently takes that and then breaks down and cries? Clarence Thomas had none of that shit when Pedo Joe tried to take him down by insulting his character. The signs that Kavenaugh is weak and easily broken were all there.
The entire weight of the western authoritarian oligarchy putting the screws to less than 9 people, two with young children and families. Is it really so hard to believe these people were heavily coerced? They were likely also told that whatever they did with the case it wouldn't matter in the end anyway, so just don't take it. Could also be that they are "traitors," but with how much was on the line, and how much had already been accomplished (dominion/the steal), blackmail/coercion was a cakewalk finale.
Schumer gave a speech giving (no so) veiled threats to them. "You won't know what hit you." What is that suppose to mean? How can he get away with that? This is the same Schumer that says things like [paraphrased] "The intelligence community with get back at you 9 ways if you cross them." When he threatens them they take it very seriously. It is a shame that Trump relied on people to have wisdom and courage. Because the most of the Justices are lacking.
I'm legitimately curious on Kav's response to "If the right started the harass and threaten you and your family would you reconsider your position on voter fraud being legal?"
Send him a plastic skull and a quote: to be or not to be. Sincerely every Shakespeare fans and maybe everyone who knows the election was fucking rigged
I've been trying to find the scary/creepy clip where there is one "Organizer" issuing orders to a mob and the mob is repeating everything the "organizer" is saying. One person in the mob questions the orders and the mob's energy just turns on her. It exposes the cult like mentality of the left so badly that I think it has been scrubbed clean.
Surely someone put it on Bitchute. Finding it on there would be difficult though. It might be in the middle of an amalgamation of clips someone has already compiled?
Kavanaugh is a Bush man and DC fixture. He was already a traitor on that account.
Trump had a very large country filled with conservative judges to pick from.
When did “I need to defer to the counsel of McConnell and other DC establishment for a list of my choices” become his strategy and override the old Trump that always did things HIS way?
The Conservative Treehouse writer has been covering Senate corruption for years. He has a catchphrase that sums it all up - "There are Trillions at Stake." And he's right.
The media really loved this narrative, opposite day, their job is to sew division, keep the focus on feelings so as to divert attention from the crazy changes Biden is now making in the Whitehouse, a few journos are leaving this rat race, hope they start their own news outlet.
I know it's an unpopular opinion right now, but Kavanaugh isn't a "traitor" even though I disagree with some of his decisions. The left is the mob, though - they have their "foot soldiers" like in the video and their back room "dons" in DC. Unlike the mob, however, the left also has a massive propaganda machine working overtime to convince everyone they're legit.
He's a traitor, maybe not in what he believes but because he is a coward that does not want to fight against the mob when he already has what he wants, his nice job. He doesn't want his family harassed (or worse). He doesn't want whatever Schuemer meant by "You'll have called down the whirlwind... You won't know what hit you."
You don't have to be a traitor by openly betraying those who you vowed to serve (the American people) but simply refusing to act when you needed to.
I really don't wish ill on anyone, but I would certainly smirk if people like him and ACB, who are in a position of power, had some of their decisions or non decisions come back to affect them the way it's affected so many others.
Not everyone I disagree with is a "traitor". I don't ask for (or expect) 100% agreement. I don't agree with 100% of Trump's positions, either, but I don't think he betrayed me or that he is a traitor.
ETA: For clarity's sake, I will say I believe the "secret cabal" of oligarchs are traitors.
They should be put down like animals. Let God judge them and me. I am but a man. When another human is in inveterate liar, an open hypocrite using morality as a weapon of deception continually, what are we supposed to make of it? This isn't about the difference of ideologies. This is something else. I think we have to think outside of the box on this one. I really do.
They all just want to lock themselves in their cabins and enjoy the rest of their time alive in 1st class cabins while the ship sinks, failing to realize the hole in small and can be plugged, and the pumps can be turned on to pump out the water...they got wet and didn't like the cold water, so they gave up.
I think Kavanaugh only sees the absolute mess he got himself into and therefore does not speak out at the people who would have his family crucified. Weak? perhaps. But one does not sacrifice their own child. This is what our God commands us. Perhaps he is not willing to sacrifice his family directly to this current mob. But is he protecting them at the end of this process?
The fact of the matter is, the right doesn't have enough political agents like the left does. I've been advocating adopting the Left's methods when dealing with these traitors. I wish we wouldn't have to, but cowards are controlled by fear, and the left has proven "Terrorism works." I hate that we will have to stoop to this level, but what we are doing now and relying on the courage of those in power to do what is right is not working.
Democratic government is fundamentally a mob, reglardless of how you attempt to civilize it.
https://youtu.be/rUKsE1KIeH4?t=40
The Left is the biggest most dangerous cult there has ever been.
So accurate. They worship infanticide, preach degeneracy, wage war on every good tradition and value, normalize political violence, weaponize government institutions, and abolish freedom wherever good men refuse to do something about it
Sounds like satanism to me.
Marx said the core of communism is atheism, it checks out.
Marxism replaces worship of God with worship of the state. You cannot, however, build one on top of the other. It is first necessary to eliminate worship of God.
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.
They are a minority though. They're only brazen because they have all the social and political power. The real mob that's dangerous is the silent majority because they're silent and allow the left to run America into the ground and degenerate the youth.
The left/right dichotomy is like 2 actors playing their respective roles perfectly and then being surprised the movie ends like it was written.
I think you're right. Most people just want to live their lives and will go with the flow.
Which is the only reason this nonsense goes on. If people would stand up for basic principles (not even one party, just stand up for things like the law, fairness, following the Constitution) they would never get away with this.
Left-wing politics is literally a secular religion for atheists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYOtSyrdzvQ
I think Islam might want a word with that statement
https://hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM
That's why the United States is a Constitutional Republic, and NOT a democracy.
Because the problem isn't government. The problem is people. Anarchy would have the same issues, they would just be called by different names.
Are you suggesting that we voted for this? Election fraud has been happening. We know it’s been happening for some time. WE elected better leaders than this, but that’s not who won.
Even if a majority voted in favor of what the government does to us on a regular basis it wouldn't make it legitimate or moral.
Okay.
That's not a response to my claim. Of course the "organizers" are just as bad as anybody else. Shoot, they're probably worse on average.
But anarchy doesn't solve the problem. People will always seek power and to force their will on others. Lack of government won't change that, it just changes the avenues through which it's obtained.
Now, if you want to argue for Anarchy or Libertarianism based on principle that's fine. But if your argument is based on some expected outcome then you're as foolish as the communists. Especially if you fail to acknowledge human nature as the source of most of mankind's problems.
It changes the scope and scale of that aggression if people do not widely view it as legitimate.
I do argue mostly from principle, even if government does lead to better outcomes it does not make it morally acceptable in the same way that slavery is detestable even if it leads to cheaper cotton.
It absolutely is, and Libertarianism is not a utopian vision that claims to end all the ills of humanity, only to reduce or eliminate the most dangerous result of those flaws.
Absolutely nobody thinks their tendencies are always good.
The country formerly known as...
Its neither now
If that scrub Pelosi gets her bill it will be a democracy, no more checks and balances, no more law. It's almost like that already
Yes.
Why do you keep repeating the same things despite being refuted multiple times?
Your opinions do not refute the fact that government has no moral authority.
Subjective opinions about moral authority have nothing to do with the objective fact that nothing restrains anyone or anything's authority, be it an individual or a business or a government, besides force; a fact that's been explained to you more than once, yet you continue spamming quotes about the "failures to limit government" as if it's a valid argument for anarchism.
A mugger may be able to compel you to give up your wallet by threatening you with a level of violence you can't meet, but this is separate from the idea of authority.
Authority is the idea that such an action is morally acceptable, and so long as people believe the coercion of government to be morally acceptable they will be accomplices in the violence of the State.
Again, subjective moral opinions have nothing to do with force being the only thing that restrains all of those actions.
It's interesting how flexible your line between "people" and "the State" is. Why wouldn't the people be responsible for their own government? Ideally they'd be the active participants in the violence against their enemies, rather than shunting the entire affair to bureaucracies where it's easier to corrupt.
I like some of the quotes you toss about but damn, you're so-close/so-far on this. All authority derives from violence. There's literally no alternative. (In my case, username very much related). You can't hand-wave away the fact that the implementation of governmental authority requires, and indeed fully and completely depends upon, violence. By archaic law and careful script you might be the "rightful" ruler of a state, and thus hold full moral authority to rule relative to, say, some brigands that have taken over. But without the violence, you have precisely fuck-all.
Kavanaugh is cucked because he remembers how scary it was to hold the attention of the cancel culture marxists...
To be honest he was a bad pick, he was always a cuck, I was hoping that event turns him to a man but....
I agree. I found his past opinions on the Patriot Act to be concerning. I was hoping the hate he recieved would forge another Thomas. So far I would say I have been very, very wrong.
Looks like it had the opposite effect.
They broke him.
His participation in cleaning up the Bush / Gore mess was taken as a sign that "ZOMG -- HE'S OUR GUY!!!" The confirmation clown show Kavanaugh "endured" was the public humiliation required for lifetime employment.
I'll wait for someone else to do ACB.
Gorsuch was legit tho.
Gorsuch has been legit on most things except making trannies a protected class.
According to Robert Barnes, Kennedy made a demand to have Kavanaugh as his replacement as a condition to retiring at that time., and that Barrett is Mitch's choice.
So...we got screwed?
Always have been.
Yes
Well based on what we know now, that checks out.
When it was revealed during confirmation that he only has women law clerks as a rule - due to his belief that women don’t get equal access to careers in law - that was a flashing red siren that he is a soft leftist cuck. Even RBG praised him on that policy once he joined the SC. He cried and pleaded like a bitch in front of the Senate who repeatedly attacked and humiliated him, including Kamala Harris who straight out called him a serial rapist in front of his wife and two young girls. What kind of man sits there and silently takes that and then breaks down and cries? Clarence Thomas had none of that shit when Pedo Joe tried to take him down by insulting his character. The signs that Kavenaugh is weak and easily broken were all there.
Kek.
So it turns out Kavanaugh is a serial rapist after all. A rapist of America and the constitution.
Woooehhh haven't seen comments like this since Jan 6, probably will be a false flag tommorow lol
Joined 4 days ago, convenient timing
No wonder they're angry. They're too ugly to get laid.
that's why they like to identify with as many genders as they can make up. In their minds it improves their odds of having sex with something.
The entire weight of the western authoritarian oligarchy putting the screws to less than 9 people, two with young children and families. Is it really so hard to believe these people were heavily coerced? They were likely also told that whatever they did with the case it wouldn't matter in the end anyway, so just don't take it. Could also be that they are "traitors," but with how much was on the line, and how much had already been accomplished (dominion/the steal), blackmail/coercion was a cakewalk finale.
Schumer gave a speech giving (no so) veiled threats to them. "You won't know what hit you." What is that suppose to mean? How can he get away with that? This is the same Schumer that says things like [paraphrased] "The intelligence community with get back at you 9 ways if you cross them." When he threatens them they take it very seriously. It is a shame that Trump relied on people to have wisdom and courage. Because the most of the Justices are lacking.
Cowards or traitors, it makes no difference. They all deserve the same fate.
Exactly. Being a coward who accepts all that power is an evil act in and of itself.
You're throwing the country - and therefore freedom - under the bus so you can have a title.
Kavanaugh is cucked because he had no grain in his spine called for conservatism. I have become a hard core conservative since 2008.
so you support adultery laws?
This is the most based comment I’ve seen all day
Yes let's have the 1950s wholesomeness with 2020s morality. Let's move to Texas and vote for California too.
They've already shown they're willing to kill supreme court justices.
Scalia?
Just some wetworks at the vineyard, nothing to see here.
At some point the blame falls on all of us for not stopping this shit dead in its tracks.
It’s 100% our fault.
Conservatives are by nature, conservative, and like to keep to themselves.
The Left rallied together, burned down entire cities, and got everything they’ve ever wanted.
Needs more burning buildings
Or bombings from Obama's friends.
The title of that video is cringe worthy.
*they're
Exactly. I hate being a spelling Nazi but when you're trying to make a counterpoint to the libtards with grammatical errors it loses its impact.
My brutha.
What is this the G rated version? Where's the killings, arson, head kicks, piss bags, kidnap and torture we've all witnessed
Maybe Kavanaugh needs a black eye from Trump to remind him who to fear.
I'm legitimately curious on Kav's response to "If the right started the harass and threaten you and your family would you reconsider your position on voter fraud being legal?"
Send him a plastic skull and a quote: to be or not to be. Sincerely every Shakespeare fans and maybe everyone who knows the election was fucking rigged
You do it
Add those were some of the tamer mob clips
I've been trying to find the scary/creepy clip where there is one "Organizer" issuing orders to a mob and the mob is repeating everything the "organizer" is saying. One person in the mob questions the orders and the mob's energy just turns on her. It exposes the cult like mentality of the left so badly that I think it has been scrubbed clean.
Surely someone put it on Bitchute. Finding it on there would be difficult though. It might be in the middle of an amalgamation of clips someone has already compiled?
Man I'm trying. If you happen to see it please post it.
Man the left really does seem like it is possessed or mk ultra or something is controlling them.
It's called "the mega narrative" It is their god.
He looks like a cuck. I don't normally judge people on looks but unfortunately his actions match his looks.
Dumb jogger bitches get away with EVERYTHING. Literally they can't be held accountable or else it's racist. For fucks sake I'm sick of clown world.
A bunch of foul-mouth, libtard, fat, ugly hambeasts from Hell I says.
Or maybe Kavanaugh was in on it tge whole time. Nothing surprises me.
Should probably change the title to they're so they don't think we're dumbasses just sayin
Honestly. Go through all of that trouble editing a video just to fuck it up like that is embarrassing.
Not my video
Fuck it, lets buy Greenland. I want to leave this clown country.
I honestly thought that was one of Trump’s most underrated ideas. It’s a great idea.
I've heard that Kavanaugh was Justice Kennedy's choice.
What is there not mobs?
Came here to see how many corrected “There” to “They’re.”
Kavanaugh is a Bush man and DC fixture. He was already a traitor on that account. Trump had a very large country filled with conservative judges to pick from.
When did “I need to defer to the counsel of McConnell and other DC establishment for a list of my choices” become his strategy and override the old Trump that always did things HIS way?
We will never get an explanation for this.
Senate confirmation.
then our country is gone completely
The Conservative Treehouse writer has been covering Senate corruption for years. He has a catchphrase that sums it all up - "There are Trillions at Stake." And he's right.
The media really loved this narrative, opposite day, their job is to sew division, keep the focus on feelings so as to divert attention from the crazy changes Biden is now making in the Whitehouse, a few journos are leaving this rat race, hope they start their own news outlet.
The slow roll music in the background was a lovely touch.
"It's not a mob until YOU do it."
I know it's an unpopular opinion right now, but Kavanaugh isn't a "traitor" even though I disagree with some of his decisions. The left is the mob, though - they have their "foot soldiers" like in the video and their back room "dons" in DC. Unlike the mob, however, the left also has a massive propaganda machine working overtime to convince everyone they're legit.
He's a traitor, maybe not in what he believes but because he is a coward that does not want to fight against the mob when he already has what he wants, his nice job. He doesn't want his family harassed (or worse). He doesn't want whatever Schuemer meant by "You'll have called down the whirlwind... You won't know what hit you."
You don't have to be a traitor by openly betraying those who you vowed to serve (the American people) but simply refusing to act when you needed to.
I really don't wish ill on anyone, but I would certainly smirk if people like him and ACB, who are in a position of power, had some of their decisions or non decisions come back to affect them the way it's affected so many others.
He failed to uphold his sworn duty to the constitution by not protecting it from a criminal usurper.
He is a traitor and deserves to die a traitors death just like anyone else whose cowardice or corruption has led to betray the nation.
No, you’re right. He couldn’t betray us considering he never had any loyalty to begin with.
Yeah but why do you say he's not a traitor?
Because he didn't join Thomas or Alito in hearing voter fraud.
Not everyone I disagree with is a "traitor". I don't ask for (or expect) 100% agreement. I don't agree with 100% of Trump's positions, either, but I don't think he betrayed me or that he is a traitor.
ETA: For clarity's sake, I will say I believe the "secret cabal" of oligarchs are traitors.
When I see all these ‘protesters’ I can’t help but think we need more ‘drivers’.....
They should be put down like animals. Let God judge them and me. I am but a man. When another human is in inveterate liar, an open hypocrite using morality as a weapon of deception continually, what are we supposed to make of it? This isn't about the difference of ideologies. This is something else. I think we have to think outside of the box on this one. I really do.
I cant get past the "there not mobs" Bad grammer
"It's OK when we do it but you're a racist if you do the same thing." - Every Democrat
I don't care, you can never placate a mob, never.
They all just want to lock themselves in their cabins and enjoy the rest of their time alive in 1st class cabins while the ship sinks, failing to realize the hole in small and can be plugged, and the pumps can be turned on to pump out the water...they got wet and didn't like the cold water, so they gave up.
corrupt or cowards, they are traitors for allowing these embarrassing leftist mobs to rule
They're ****
It's not that fucking hard.
Damn kavanaugh
The plural of "Democrat" is "mob." Prove me wrong.
I think Kavanaugh only sees the absolute mess he got himself into and therefore does not speak out at the people who would have his family crucified. Weak? perhaps. But one does not sacrifice their own child. This is what our God commands us. Perhaps he is not willing to sacrifice his family directly to this current mob. But is he protecting them at the end of this process?
Then he should have never accepted his position.
It’s up to us to make those traitors’ lives absolute fucking hell. Drive them to insanity if need be. Never let them forget what they did.
The fact of the matter is, the right doesn't have enough political agents like the left does. I've been advocating adopting the Left's methods when dealing with these traitors. I wish we wouldn't have to, but cowards are controlled by fear, and the left has proven "Terrorism works." I hate that we will have to stoop to this level, but what we are doing now and relying on the courage of those in power to do what is right is not working.
That's such BS. If conservatives did any of that, we would be branded seditionists, facists, traitors and/or terrorists.
We already have/they've already did.
The Democrats actually are now the mob- the mafioso mob.
I hate sharing a country with these people. Ruining a perfectly good country with their insanity
Moral of the story: never wear black rimmed glasses
What was the video? It got removed
Follow the link, it's still on YouTube as of now (40 mins after your post).
Thanks 👍
I’ve tried googling it, but why did dems pound on scotus doors? They weren’t voting in there. Was it his swearing in?
They're* ;)
Well done.
Good video! Now upload it to odysee.com also so YouTube can't censor it.
English at its worst
Freedom seeds dispatch them quickly