1160
Comments (184)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
153
DaveMastor 153 points ago +160 / -7

Oh boy, a Lin Wood post. Now instead of people commenting on this issue and seriously debating it, we'll get a bunch of people not reading it at all and just complaining and reeeeeing about how much they hate Lin Wood.

We get it folks, you don't need to virtue signal to all the other patriots about how much you don't believe him. We already know, we're all already looking at this with healthy skepticism. Just move on. 🙂

61
Chairman_Jao_Bi_Den [S] 61 points ago +64 / -3

🎯

12
Error404 12 points ago +12 / -0

Nice bullseye... wait a second that term offends me!!! cancel the term "bullseye"!!!!

10
MySidesGoUp 10 points ago +10 / -0

Cuck’s eye- much better

3
FAQ-REDDIT 3 points ago +3 / -0

Buck eye -

27
61775 27 points ago +29 / -2

Bingo.

24
Joesf23 24 points ago +25 / -1

I dont get the insane hatred for lin wood. He is out there with some datefagging and predictions, but he is over the target when calling a spade a spade. People need to chill the F-out.

6
WU_HAN_FRU 6 points ago +6 / -0

It reminds me of the stupid hatred for Trump by the people who became #NeverTrump and eventually #LincolnProject. Exact same dynamics.

5
borscht-nazi 5 points ago +7 / -2

>I dont get the insane hatred
Read "The True Believer" by Eric Hoffer, you'll understand.

7
Joesf23 7 points ago +7 / -0

You got a cliff notes or a TL;DL summary on that book? Lol....seriously though, you really think Wood is off his rocker and doesnt know what he is doing? Or you think he is playing our side for fools? He has pretty much ruined his career and name if all his accusations are false due to libel laws. He is either insane and dumb as hell, or crazy like a fox

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
Joesf23 1 point ago +1 / -0

I sometimes wonder if Wood's heart is in the right place along with Sidney Powell, but someone or some people keep feeding them bad information on purpose to make them and us look like fools and kooks by chasing fake news and rumors that come from "reliable sources" when really those sources are plants from the other side. I see this a lot by the Q followers where 1 thing will come true out of 100, so it is juuuuust enough to keep people strung along and distracted. At this point I think if you have something, spill it and show it. Otherwise, STFU on the riddles, hints, clues, and blue balling all of us with "sooooon...." predictions that never happen.

2
bigbossman2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I personally find that he took advantage of a lot of people that were desperate for hope.

He was merely a self-promoting, grandstander who did nothing but make a lot of Patriots look bad.

5
President_Elect_Pepe 5 points ago +20 / -15

Respectfully as a reasonably intelligent human Lin Wood should understand that his brand is damaged.

If he truly wanted information to be seen as valuable he could have given to 1000 other more trustworthy people to disseminate it.

TLDR: It’s not our fault Lin Wood is seen as crazy. So maybe put the blame where it belongs instead of complaining about a completely natural reaction.

24
Porkbut 24 points ago +31 / -7

It is exactly the person who sees Lin as crazy and says so publicly who is responsible for public perception that Lin is crazy, by basic logic. Public perception is driven by public opinion, not pure and clear examination of facts. So you are almost 100% wrong other than Lin should be smarter than all of you and see how stupid and driven by peer pressure you are, and act accordingly

10
chahn1138 10 points ago +13 / -3

AGREED

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-7
President_Elect_Pepe -7 points ago +4 / -11

Where did I call this man crazy though.

You’re entirely missing the point.

I’m just being objective about the opinions of others.

And really why so knee jerk.

It’s clear your opinions here are just as destructive. You’re not pushing the message either, you’re just being reactive about his reputation.

Is it your goal to legitimize this info or just argue?/

10
Redpillgirlfrommars 10 points ago +11 / -1

You literally just called him brain damaged and said “it’s not our fault he is seen as crazy”. You don’t have to spell it out, it’s pretty clear that’s what you implied.

Also fuck you, Lin Wood hasn’t said anything crazier than the shit we have seen on here.

7
Porkbut 7 points ago +12 / -5

The irony of accusing me of missing the point is palpable

2
Porkbut 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because you didnt read my post accurately, ill repeat it in a more instructional format so you have a better understanding. My whole post other than the end was facts explaining to you how public opinion is constructed seeing as you were having trouble understanding its origins. It is nearly solely derived from people discussing it, its how many myths and legends were formed in antiquity. I never accused you directly of calling him crazy, just pointed out what the label stems from. i agreed with your first sentence that he needs to realize what public opinion is, assuming he doesnt already know, which i believe he does anyway. But only so he can curate it for the dumb dumbs who can only comprehend the world through the lens of popular opinion.

0
borscht-nazi 0 points ago +4 / -4

Fren, you are trying to reason with an overly emotional mob with low reading comprehension ability. Are you a masochist? 🤔

9
Redpillgirlfrommars 9 points ago +12 / -3

In a way, it is your fault. Maybe instead of defaulting to “lulz hes brain damaged”, read what he is posting, use critical thinking, and draw conclusions about the content given. By instead choosing to autistically screech that’s he’s crazy, no fucking shit people are going to say “omg I can’t read this! People said he’s crazy!”.

That’s a leftist tactic. Insult, dismiss, disregard. Stop acting like the left. It’s embarrassing.

4
MastaJoda 4 points ago +7 / -3

THIS!!! Bunch of lefty wannabe fucks around this B

1
President_Elect_Pepe 1 point ago +3 / -2

Honestly there are clearly people here who get what I am saying. I’m not going to relent for some sake of popularity.

I’m trying to create wins. You do that by releasing information in the most convincing manner.

The Lin Wood brand is damaged. He knows that and should do something about it himself.

Is he doing this for wins or for the sake of his ego? I’ll let others decide.

1
Porkbut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its just 3-5 of you jacking eachother off, not nearly as popular as you think. Also the ego comment is hilarious, is that not what you are doing right now? And what wins are you desperately creating? Pointless minor victories in the court of public opinion? Convincing everyone you think Lin is crazy wont draw them to your side, conviction in beliefs will though. Honestly, you kind of sound like Graham or Romney, just a rino who thinks they have control over things they dont, and considers themselves far smarter than most of humanity, and always knows what it takes for "victory" more than any other members of the nation. Its a stifling arrogance, that boxes you up in modes of stagnant uselessness, while playing pointless games for pointless "wins", and you draw resources from actual battles actually damaging the very public image you seek to preserve.

0
borscht-nazi 0 points ago +2 / -2

Bud, do you not see that whoever you are talking to can't differentiate brand from brain? It's just here to rage over anything.

-2
JackLemon -2 points ago +2 / -4

His brand is not only damaged, it's completely destroyed. No credible person wants anything to do with the unhinged QTard whose actions, like those of the QAnon psy-ops have and are damaging to Trump and the MAGA movement.

-1
borscht-nazi -1 points ago +1 / -2

>>Respectfully as a reasonably intelligent human Lin Wood should understand that his brand is damaged.
>>brand is damaged

>>brand

>“lulz hes brain damaged”

>brain

>REEEEE LEFTIST TACTIC

https://i.imgur.com/ESiYZCQ.gif

-2
JackLemon -2 points ago +2 / -4

No it isn't his fault. Lin Wood made an utter fool of himself by his own words and actions. He is a known QTard. That fact alone justifies disregarding everything he says. The only people that support him seemed to be QTards.

4
2016TrumpMAGA 4 points ago +17 / -13

Two pages into the actual transcript and it's clear it's 100% bullshit ramblings of a schizophrenic pathological liar.

9
ninja009 9 points ago +11 / -2

I thought you were talking about Obama or Pedo Joe or your gal Killary.

4
borscht-nazi 4 points ago +4 / -0

How so?

(I'm just getting to it.)

3
2016TrumpMAGA 3 points ago +7 / -4

When you've experienced a certain number of them, you see the pattern.

The three themes that come up like clockwork are:

  • Lots of advanced degrees (like a ridiculous number) that cannot be verified.
  • High ranking officials/intelligence agency officials picking on them personally (eg: This is why the degrees cannot be verified - Rod Rosenstein/Pence/whoever personally, themselves, with their own hands, erased them).
  • Homosexuality, often homosexual rape of the story teller.

I conducted thousands of job interviews back in the 90s, and every so often you run into one of these guys. "So, Mr. Jones, why is someone with three PhDs applying for a job in a call center?" And then out comes the lunacy. The most fucked up part is that probably 10% of them will then call the cops on you, claiming you - you guessed it - buttfucked them during the job interview. Even though the cops KNOW it's bullshit, they have to come out and interview you every single time. My assistant: "u/2016TrumpMAGA, the cops are out here to see you. What's up?" Me: "I probably buttfucked another job applicant."

1
Chairman_Jao_Bi_Den [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

You are drawing false equivalence, and sound like a narcissistic asshole who thinks he knows better than everyone else.

If it's all bullshit, then what are YOU doing to make a positive change in the world? Shitting on people fighting for justice is NOT what we need right now. We NEED the ruling class to be CRUCIFIED for centuries of crimes against humanity.

1
Porkbut 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why dont you use the specifics in this article to make your claims, instead of drawing some ridiculous side story about in the 90's while you were managing a call center, you know, a beacon for the sane, you dealt with depositions affidavits and can therefore spot this mans lies from orbit with how blatant they are. You dont call out any real specific inconsistencies in this at all, just say effectively that because youve seen thousands of crazies give you job apps while working at a call center, this man definitely is lying because he claims a work/education history youre having trouble verifying. Apples and oranges is even a bad description for your analysis, more like apples and airplanes. So not only have you not successfully attacked this mans credibility, people should be questioning yours.