🚨🚨BREAKING🚨🚨: Lin Wood Drops a Bombshell 191-Page Whistleblower transcript about the Deep State: Rosenstein, VP Mike Pence, Roberts and Children, Judge Assassination Plots, Murder of Scalia with DMSO, the Robbery and Murder of Seth Rich, the "Dirty Trick Squad", Pedo Judge Sullivan, Pedo Joe Bi
(populist.press)
⚠️ HIGH ENERGY⚠️
Comments (184)
sorted by:
This is a transcribed interview with "Ryan Dark White," who is a convicted felon. The interviews are titled "confidential interview" but there's nothing "confidential" about an interview that's published online. What a joke.
From Yahoo! Money syndication of Daily Beast article (yes, I know -- BS source but it's based on court cases that are Google-able and public and which are written in a dry manner and don't have succinct summaries):
Source: https://money.yahoo.com/lin-wood-fave-qanon-oracle-094608473.html
If you don't believe the article, here are links to some of the filings from his court cases:
So color me skeptical when I see a transcribed interview (not under oath or otherwise under penalty of perjury) with a convicted felon and opioid dealer who spins wild conspiracy tales.
There are so many laughable claims in this interview:
Pence didn't even run for President in 2016. Why would he think the presidency was "his slot"? Absurd.
Rod Rosenstein wanted the VP position? What? Rosenstein hasn't shown any interest in elected office, ever.
No, this is a lie. Shaun Bridges is in jail because he stole bitcoin during the investigation of Silk Road. Read the book American Kingpin if you want details on the Silk Road investigation.
Pence did not run for president. This is false.
Starting on p.99, "Ryan Dark White" starts to mix in doubt about the reasons for his criminal prosecution, which IMO is his true motive. He wants to overturn his conviction and he is using the Q believers as a platform to broadcast his claims.
Where's the evidence? Great claims require great evidence. Otherwise, this is just libel.
White obviously has an axe to grind against Rosenstein: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.348460/gov.uscourts.mdd.348460.1.0.pdf
Consider the motives. Consider the source. The whole thing is outlandish. It's hard for me to fathom that someone would lend credibility to this interview.
These are the fevered dreams of someone with an overactive imagination. He mixes in little-known facts (Rosenstein was the only AG retained by Obama) to provide his made-up tales with a veneer of credibility (people think, "wow, I didn't know that and it's true so other things he's saying must be true"). Please use your critical thinking when evaluating stuff like this. It's bunk.
Great post, thanks!