Why dont you use the specifics in this article to make your claims, instead of drawing some ridiculous side story about in the 90's while you were managing a call center, you know, a beacon for the sane, you dealt with depositions affidavits and can therefore spot this mans lies from orbit with how blatant they are. You dont call out any real specific inconsistencies in this at all, just say effectively that because youve seen thousands of crazies give you job apps while working at a call center, this man definitely is lying because he claims a work/education history youre having trouble verifying. Apples and oranges is even a bad description for your analysis, more like apples and airplanes. So not only have you not successfully attacked this mans credibility, people should be questioning yours.