They are but, the conservative judges, with the arguable exceptions of Clarence and Alito, usually go along with precedent that they don't necessarily agree with quite heavily. ACB would be a toss up, because there currently isn't a reliance on transgendering children. But I could really see it going either way BECAUSE of how Row v Wade was written.
They are but, the conservative judges, with the arguable exceptions of Clarence and Alito, usually go along with precedent that they don't necessarily agree with quite heavily. ACB would be a toss up, because there currently isn't a reliance on transgendering children. But I could really see it going either way BECAUSE of how Row v Wade was written.