304
My professor played herself. Thought Id share (media.patriots.win) 😷 LOCKDOWN BS 😷
posted ago by AzazelAku ago by AzazelAku +304 / -0
Comments (52)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-2
deleted -2 points ago +9 / -11
15
Animator 15 points ago +15 / -0

It doesn't exactly take a tinfoil hat to be distrustful of an experimental mRNA "vaccine" that was rushed to market with no long term safety data that doesn't even provide immunity from the largely harmless virus it was meant to prevent. Knowing someone who collapsed dead a week after getting the shot doesn't help matters, either. Seems like an idiotic and reckless risk to me, but I'm not standing in anyone's way.

1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could you describe the context of the person who died? Were they already ill? Co-morbidities? Manner of death?

3
Animator 3 points ago +3 / -0

He was a 37 year old cop with no pre-existing conditions. He felt sick initially after the second dose but felt better 2 days later and went back to work. 2 days after that he got short of breath on a call and collapsed. He died in the ambulance on the way to the hospital. At his age he was at absolutely no risk from covid. He had two young kids and a wife and they're absolutely devastated.

2
Nellie_the_Beaut 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is tragic and horrifying. Literally taken in the prime of his life, for no reason at all. I’m so sorry for your loss and for his poor family. 🙏🏼

1
TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know someone who nearly died, had to get a tube and placed on a ventilator because they had a bad reaction to it

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
7
Animator 7 points ago +7 / -0

How long the vaccine takes to physically manufacture has nothing to do with the length of time it spends in the development and approval process.

So, like I said originally, because these vaccines were rushed to market bypassing many of the regulatory and safety trial steps thanks to Operation Warpspeed, we have no long term safety data on human trial subjects. mRNA vaccines are still considered experimental and have never been widely used in humans before.

Also, maybe we should wait a little bit before declaring a CEO's prediction correct. There's no way we can possibly determine that without some actual real world data to support it.

11
ObamakilledJoan 11 points ago +11 / -0

I’m guessing we “tinfoil hat wearers” downvote this because we think it’s rational to question the need for a vaccine to fight an illness with a 99.7% survival rate 🤷🏼‍♀️

6
ObamasLooseButthole 6 points ago +6 / -0
  1. Completely agree it's ridiculous to even get a vaccine for something that will not kill you unless you were going to die soon anyway.

  2. Love your username and yes he did.

4
Barbs 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think a lot of people are worried that this is gonna be like thalidomide, especially since this is a new style vaccine that was rushed to market. I kinda see it as a flu shot, and I’m not very concerned about the flu, so likely won’t seek out the vaccine for a while, if ever.

That’s even if you can really call it a vaccine, since you’re still infected but don’t show symptoms (allegedly). At least I think that’s how they say it’s supposed to work.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0