1338
Comments (25)
sorted by:
18
Anaconda 18 points ago +23 / -5

Yawn...get back to us when it gets 60 senate votes. DOA in the Senate

32
Moebius [S] 32 points ago +32 / -0

Yawn...Trump won in a LANDSLIDE...yet here we are...listening to the howls for the 'replacement' of the Senate Parliamentarian.

11
Warcraft1966 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yawn wake me up when the Paris Climate Accord bankrupts the country in under a year.

6
MasterOfIllusions 6 points ago +6 / -0

That kind of complacency, assuming that someone else would solve it for us, is why the election fraud stands.

1
OXIE 1 point ago +1 / -0

They only need 50 votes in the Senate plus a Vice President to cast the Tie breaker which they already have.

They only need 60 votes to close down a filibuster. That is if somebody summons the energy to start a filibuster to stop it from being voted on.

They already have it split up into smaller pieces in their own Senate Bills

SB301

A bill to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to provide Federal standards for mail-in ballots and reporting of election results with respect to elections for Federal office.

A bill to amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to allow all eligible voters to vote by mail in Federal elections, to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to provide for automatic voter registration.

Status: Introduced on January 28 2021 - 25% progression Action: 2021-01-28 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

Tracking Information

https://legiscan.com/US/bill/SB301/2021

SB459

A bill to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to promote integrity in voter registration, the casting of ballots, and the tabulation of ballots in elections for Federal office, and for other purpose...

Status: Introduced on February 25 2021 - 25% progression Action: 2021-02-25 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration. Pending: Senate Rules And Administration Committee

https://legiscan.com/US/bill/SB459/2021

SB416

A bill to restore integrity to America's Elections.

Status: Introduced on February 24 2021 - 25% progression Action: 2021-02-24 - Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration. Pending: Senate Rules And Administration Committee

https://legiscan.com/US/bill/SB416/2021

https://legiscan.com/US/pending/senate-rules-administration-committee/id/2331

12
Starxteel 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's irrelevant what laws they pass. At the next election there will be conservatives, military and police all of them armed to the teeth in 3 shifts to watch all the garbage BLM counting by hand everything single paper ballot with signature and ID number and if anyone dares to interfere or cause a scene, they will be warned twice, once verbally once with a warning shot and if they still insist they can get the bullet too. I'm fucking done.

11
MasterOfIllusions 11 points ago +11 / -0

Military and police will do what their COs tell them to do. As we've seen from the DC circus, that means they'll just keep enforcing the steal.

6
kt524 6 points ago +6 / -0

They are more conditioned for unquestioningly following orders than to obey the constitution.

3
doug2 3 points ago +3 / -0

No there will not. Was GA runoff like that?

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
Geeee 4 points ago +4 / -0

And who's going to tell them that? They'll just say no standing or call it moot.

8
_-Th0r-_ 8 points ago +8 / -0

She misses the bigger point.

All you need to prove to a non-deranged person that Dems pulled out every fraudulent trick in their playbook in 2020 is that HR #1 ... not 46, not 87, not 121... the FIRST order of business is making their entire fraud playbook illegal.

Every not-too-far-gone Dem I’ve said this to has no counter.

Then I just remind them 1 in 4 Dems believe it was stolen.

2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya. That argument is changing zero minds lol. It is definitely not all we need to say.

5
MasterOfIllusions 5 points ago +5 / -0

If the Constitution says that states decide how their own elections are run, shouldn't states tell the federal government to fuck off?

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

It isn't that simple bro. Why? Because they ignore the clear and explicit instructions of the constitution

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
kt524 4 points ago +4 / -0

It passes, shooting starts. Plain and simple.

Not so plain and simple if the normies still keep watching msm and gulp down the fake news of being branded as terrorists.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
geewhiz 1 point ago +1 / -0

How many votes are needed for Senate passage? 50% plus one, or more?

1
Moebius [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

60 under Filibuster Rule...if it's Enforced by the Parliamentarian...

1
Trooph-Hurts 1 point ago +1 / -0

It should still be investigated at all cost

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Already moot niggga

1
Trooph-Hurts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fraud can be prosecuted

1
Moebius [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

By whom...the Cucked DOJ? Soros funded AGs?

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2