1186
Comments (37)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
KeeptheChief 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why would it be so important to give Harris two and a half terms? Couldn't they just run someone else? It's just hard to believe that if Biden is such a liability to them that they would keep him on that long just to benefit her.

18
marishiten 18 points ago +19 / -1

It's not. His usefulness has ended. It was his job to be the face so America wouldn't just flat reject Harris wholesale (because they would have) and it was his job to push through all the bullshit EO's as quick as he can because they don't know how long he has and it's better for him to look like the piece of shit and not Kuntmala since she has to worry about re election. Biden doesn't.

They always wanted Kuntmala in there, but they knew she wouldn't have stood a chance. So they used Biden to get in, sign the garbage EO's that would cause the most anger and backlash, and he'll step down, she'll step into the role.

The issue they don't realize is that no matter how long they give her to 'prove herself' she won't be accepted and the Democrats would be RETARDED if they didn't primary her in 2024.

Because she's not going to win. There's no amount of election fraud that would enable her to win in 2024. None.

8
befehlistbefehl 8 points ago +8 / -0

There's no amount of election fraud that would enable her to win in 2024.

That's where you're wrong. It's very possible she'll win 2024 with a record 150 million votes.

4
LessAndLessIronic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Add a zero to that.